Jump to content

Nederland 2023


lcm93

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, BigEnosBurdette said:

Gotta love a bunch of has beens, never was, and people who are breathing heavy from just sitting up out of bed downgrading a bunch of teenage boys. 

 

5 minutes ago, Razor said:

Some people just enjoy being miserable...I say, just let them be miserable by themselves

 

 

There's one in every fanbase unfortunately. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn’t say sorry receivers, I had misspelled receivers. I said they were one of the weak areas on offense and I am not downgrading teenagers, simply being realistic The Bulldogs just don’t have much talent this year

I would love for Nederland to win this year, however the scrimmage vs HF showed that they are not close to winning this year and I unlike some of the posters must be realistic 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, spidersal said:

Didn’t say sorry receivers, I had misspelled receivers. I said they were one of the weak areas on offense and I am not downgrading teenagers, simply being realistic The Bulldogs just don’t have much talent this year

I would love for Nederland to win this year, however the scrimmage vs HF showed that they are not close to winning this year and I unlike some of the posters must be realistic 

Since this is specifically targeted to the comments about what the scrimmage showed, can you point to a single post by “some posters” that have said Nederland was close to winning or have predicted unrealistic outcomes? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was simply my observation of the scrimmage.  A few posters indicated that they had a good scrimmage and I agree that they have improved a little from last year, but IMO they have a long way to go in order to win this season.

The realistic comment was for the posters that think I am putting players down. I have mentioned where their main weaknesses are, but have said nothing about any players. I am stating that they don’t have much talent this year.  I know that Nederland supporters don’t like this, but IMO this is a fact

I applaud the Bulldog supporters wanting the team to do well. I want them to do well also, however I am going to be realistic in my observation of the season outcome for the Dogs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, spidersal said:

This was simply my observation of the scrimmage.  A few posters indicated that they had a good scrimmage and I agree that they have improved a little from last year, but IMO they have a long way to go in order to win this season.

The realistic comment was for the posters that think I am putting players down. I have mentioned where their main weaknesses are, but have said nothing about any players. I am stating that they don’t have much talent this year.  I know that Nederland supporters don’t like this, but IMO this is a fact

I applaud the Bulldog supporters wanting the team to do well. I want them to do well also, however I am going to be realistic in my observation of the season outcome for the Dogs

You are basing the bulldogs season on 1 scrimmage. The very first one at that. You can’t win a scrimmage. Most head coaches go into a scrimmage with what targeted work they wanna work on. Let the Dogs play! 
 

One thing that you keep saying every few post is if they can’t beat WOS it’s going to be a long season. 2-8 or 3-7… Last Year PNG got man handled at home against PA then made a run to State… I am not saying the Dogs are going to make a run to state but I am saying it’s a long season, you can’t give up on them after 1 scrimmage, 1 non district game… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

You are basing the bulldogs season on 1 scrimmage. The very first one at that. You can’t win a scrimmage. Most head coaches go into a scrimmage with what targeted work they wanna work on. Let the Dogs play! 
 

One thing that you keep saying every few post is if they can’t beat WOS it’s going to be a long season. 2-8 or 3-7… Last Year PNG got man handled at home against PA then made a run to State… I am not saying the Dogs are going to make a run to state but I am saying it’s a long season, you can’t give up on them after 1 scrimmage, 1 non district game… 

Back in 2001 we "lost" a scrimmage to Hardin-Jefferson...ended up in the semi-finals that year a scrimmage is no way to judge how a season will end up that's why you have to play the games still

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, spidersal said:

This was simply my observation of the scrimmage.  A few posters indicated that they had a good scrimmage and I agree that they have improved a little from last year, but IMO they have a long way to go in order to win this season.

The realistic comment was for the posters that think I am putting players down. I have mentioned where their main weaknesses are, but have said nothing about any players. I am stating that they don’t have much talent this year.  I know that Nederland supporters don’t like this, but IMO this is a fact

I applaud the Bulldog supporters wanting the team to do well. I want them to do well also, however I am going to be realistic in my observation of the season outcome for the Dogs

Where did you get your coaching degree at ? You did not misspell the word receiver.  Hate will destroy you young man. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, spidersal said:

This was simply my observation of the scrimmage.  A few posters indicated that they had a good scrimmage and I agree that they have improved a little from last year, but IMO they have a long way to go in order to win this season.

The realistic comment was for the posters that think I am putting players down. I have mentioned where their main weaknesses are, but have said nothing about any players. I am stating that they don’t have much talent this year.  I know that Nederland supporters don’t like this, but IMO this is a fact

I applaud the Bulldog supporters wanting the team to do well. I want them to do well also, however I am going to be realistic in my observation of the season outcome for the Dogs

Receivers are sorry, weak but not putting any player/s down... hmmm?!?!  Realistic after one scrimmage... hmmm?!?! How about letting the dawgs get a couple, few REAL games under their belt before looking forward to next season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously many of you posters did not read that post correctly It came out relievers instead of receivers, I said sorry receivers in the following post because it had been misspelled 

Even though at this early stage of the season the receivers are struggling, I did not say they were sorry 

I have said many times 3-7 or 2-8 this season.  If the season turns out better, I will be the 1st to say I was wrong and I hope I get to say that

The reason I say 3-7 or 2-8 is because I do not see them beating these teams this year - PAM, FBM, Dayton, PNG, TC, Silsbee

The 2 questionable games are WOS and SF

They should beat GP and Willowridge 

IMO they do not have the talent to win these games based on what each team has coming back and last years miserable performance I believe they will be better than last year, however the wins won’t improve, but they won’t get blown out like last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, spidersal said:

Obviously many of you posters did not read that post correctly It came out relievers instead of receivers, I said sorry receivers in the following post because it had been misspelled 

Even though at this early stage of the season the receivers are struggling, I did not say they were sorry 

I have said many times 3-7 or 2-8 this season.  If the season turns out better, I will be the 1st to say I was wrong and I hope I get to say that

The reason I say 3-7 or 2-8 is because I do not see them beating these teams this year - PAM, FBM, Dayton, PNG, TC, Silsbee

The 2 questionable games are WOS and SF

They should beat GP and Willowridge 

IMO they do not have the talent to win these games based on what each team has coming back and last years miserable performance I believe they will be better than last year, however the wins won’t improve, but they won’t get blown out like last year

Fair analysis & valid points. IMO these pre season practices & scrimmages should be used to find out who can best get the job done at each position. West Brook will be an even better test to find out if the new O.C. has brought any explosiveness to the offense, if the returning starters improved from last year & what new players have what it takes to step up to make the team better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    hinab
    Newest Member
    hinab
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
    • *** Moved to High School Baseball Forum***
    • You just analogized to a tee the situation going on with the Trump New York trial. And I bet you can't even see the hypocrisy elicited out of your hatred. You once again outed yourself...without any realization of your actions. I'm not sure if Reagan actually set you up to expose your blatant hypocrisy, or if it was just a happy coincidence. You seem to thrive on humiliating yourself. Now get to work on providing that evidence of your emphatic declarations that Trump's economy was horrible. You failed miserably before, I bet you will again.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...