Jump to content

Beaumont ISD Football


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

No Beaumont school makes the football playoffs this season. That has not happened since the 1993 season when Central and West Brook missed the playoffs.

What is the issue? Players? Coaching? School support? Lack of interest? What is it?

There is too much talent in Beaumont Texas to not have at least one of their teams make the playoffs. Particularly when 4 teams go.

I know having both teams in 6A did not help, but the fact remains that the football in Beaumont looks to be on the decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

No Beaumont school makes the football playoffs this season. That has not happened since the 1993 season when Central and West Brook missed the playoffs.

What is the issue? Players? Coaching? School support? Lack of interest? What is it?

There is too much talent in Beaumont Texas to not have at least one of their teams make the playoffs. Particularly when 4 teams go.

I know having both teams in 6A did not help, but the fact remains that the football in Beaumont looks to be on the decline.

One school WB has good players but horrible coaching.  That was apparent when Coach Peevey left then the following year, they miss the playoffs for the first time in like 25 years.  Then you see what happened this year.

Accross town, you have the previous coach who was content with making the playoffs in the weakest district in Texas only to lose in the first round by the score of 500-ZERO.  Losing rubbed off on our kids and we bring in a new coach who had to inherit the holdover coaches from the previous regime plus moving up to the toughest district in the state and you see how this goes.  

There are quick solutions to these problems but I think West Brook will work toward the solution the quickest.  BU will come around but I expect a better season next year, nothing spectacular though…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have to pay good money for great coaching in some instances there are good young coaches out there but I guess In today world most of the time school’s want coaches who know the kids or have been around the program and also save money in the process please just pay the money and bring in a coaching staff that will bring in quality results with him .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add one what @BMTSoulja1 said, I think it goes much deeper.  BISD needs to nail down dedicated feeders, especially to United.  Also, I guess band in the middle schools is down because both bands are down in numbers.  Plus, it doesn't help playing Humble, Sheldon, and North Shore.  It would've been nice to play Pasadena's and Channelviews.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not a Beaumont guy, I know I been told over 1k times that it won’t ever happen. But still I will say it again. Beaumont needs to be 1 High School city. Build a brand new state of the art High School give the athletic department all the resources it needs, pay those coaches a great salary to come coach in Beaumont and keep them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

I’m not a Beaumont guy, I know I been told over 1k times that it won’t ever happen. But still I will say it again. Beaumont needs to be 1 High School city. Build a brand new state of the art High School give the athletic department all the resources it needs, pay those coaches a great salary to come coach in Beaumont and keep them. 

 

Tell the folks in the Pear Orchard that. They're the ones with the inferiority complex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

I’m not a Beaumont guy, I know I been told over 1k times that it won’t ever happen. But still I will say it again. Beaumont needs to be 1 High School city. Build a brand new state of the art High School give the athletic department all the resources it needs, pay those coaches a great salary to come coach in Beaumont and keep them. 

The towns too big for 1 school.  Longevity in the HC's, dedicated feeders to United, and the UIL putting them with Pasadena or both dropping to 5A-D1 (which could happen) and BISD football will be better 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, navydawg31 said:

Time to set the aside the bs it’s 2022. Merge the High Schools. It’s worked out pretty well for PA. 

Again, PA's numbers were shrinking.  2800 is more manageable than 4500 and PA had problems with Lincoln and TJ kids.  All the whites that were going to TJ and Austin left.  It wasn't all Peaches and cream when PA merged

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Galena park North Shore and Galena park isd is an example North Shore is a Power of course and Galena park is just there at this point now United is being labeled as a Basketball power not focusing on Football it seems so maybe West Brook needs to get something fixed they aren’t too far removed  from being in the state championship game that they barely lost to Longview I’m not sure what happened to West Brook but I’m really not used to them being this bad Beaumont has tons of talent and parents could also be there influencing their kids right now United is Basketball and hopefully West Brook can get back to Competing for state titles in football and basketball, Football for United might take a While.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Austin1985 said:

The towns too big for 1 school.  Longevity in the HC's, dedicated feeders to United, and the UIL putting them with Pasadena or both dropping to 5A-D1 (which could happen) and BISD football will be better 

What does putting them with Pasadena have to do with anything ?  Are you saying just stick them with inferior schools so they can get some wins ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lack of discipline.
 Discipline in the sense you execute the fundamentals.  There have been many schools succeed not based on just talent but by eliminating mistakes.  That starts at the top.

Self discipline to want to work hard and better yourself to achieve your goals.  A lot of kids nowadays (not just Beaumont) don’t want to work for it.  Practice is boring they’d rather play video games.  Can’t take tough coaching.  Not knowing what’s in the hallways but I’d wager you have lots of talent that is just lethargic and not participating in any extra curricular.

Discipline to fight through adversity.  Apathy, it’s hard to get up and want to participate in what some perceive is a loser.  Rather than striving to be the difference maker they just won’t participate.   Once again not unique to Beaumont, but I’d bet this is common amongst many struggling teams.  It is hard to get rid of a losing mindset.
 

Bottom line is it falls on the coaches and community.  You have to make the kids believe in program, believe in the goal, and believe in themselves.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CCRed said:

What does putting them with Pasadena have to do with anything ?  Are you saying just stick them with inferior schools so they can get some wins ?

Yep.  They are not going to beat the big 4 in their current district anytime soon.  Where there's growth, there's success.  When Kenny Ray first went to SC, he was with the Pasadena schools etc and went 9-4.  As soon as the UIL put them with NS and King, things got real rather quickly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Austin1985 said:

Again, PA's numbers were shrinking.  2800 is more manageable than 4500 and PA had problems with Lincoln and TJ kids.  All the whites that were going to TJ and Austin left.  It wasn't all Peaches and cream when PA merged

Beaumont’s numbers are shrinking every year? 4500 that is comparable to woodlands, North shore, Deer Park is at what 4K kids.. that’s just close by and a district mate/ old district mates for them. Definitely very easy and do able. , I know it wasn’t all peaches and cream when they merged it never will be, but it’s been great after a few years to iron everything out. That’s a given every where you do that at. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Austin1985 said:

Yep.  They are not going to beat the big 4 in their current district anytime soon.  Where there's growth, there's success.  When Kenny Ray first went to SC, he was with the Pasadena schools etc and went 9-4.  As soon as the UIL put them with NS and King, things got real rather quickly 

That’s not logical. Then every school that has a losing record should just be stuck with other schools with losing records ???  
That won’t make them any better or get better coaches. Look at the HISD programs. Yea, one of them might go undefeated in district, then get donkey-stomped in bi-district by a 4th place competitor. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CCRed said:

That’s not logical. Then every school that has a losing record should just be stuck with other schools with losing records ???  
That won’t make them any better or get better coaches. Look at the HISD programs. Yea, one of them might go undefeated in district, then get donkey-stomped in bi-district by a 4th place competitor. 

Just need an easier path for 2 years.  And HISD is just like every other urban ISD:  lack or resources.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mega big presents mega challenges and not just in sports.

Haven't check in a while but the head coach salaries have been low compared to even smaller district in the area. BISD also comes with a stigma that is not attractive to some, especially for the money. If you get one that may start some success, they wont be around long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • The problem as well as that all of the social justice warriors, influencers, and instigators repeat these lies in the immediate days after the event, garnering outrage.  But when they're proven false they never go back and rescind their outrage-causing posts, they just move on to the next one.
    • I just find it really hard to believe that Trump will select a VP based on the votes they bring him.  He's going to want a Trumper that will affirm his every move and stoke his ego.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I doubt it.  And as you said, in these battle ground states a few tenths of a % point may be enough to swing the whole election.  Trump can't afford a VP who will cost him votes (Noem would cost him full points, not just tenths), but also needs a candidate that will bring in as many votes as possible.  So hopefully whichever Trump disciple he chooses has some political appeal to swing voters.
    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...