Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/05/2023 in all areas
-
Trump charged.
Separation Scientist and 2 others reacted to LumRaiderFan for a topic
Your party embraces the killing of the unborn, up to delivery, they want men to be allowed in girl’s bathrooms, they want elementary school kids to be exposed to graphic sex education topics, I could go on and on. Don’t act surprised when your party get labeled based on their actions.3 points -
Trump charged.
Reagan and one other reacted to WOSdrummer99 for a topic
I'm glad you take offense. You should be ashamed of your affiliation. But don't pretend not to be apart of the whole Democratic mess. Then turn around and refer to the MAGA wing of the Republican Party as authoritarianism. Btw... Try to keep it clean. No one wants to see your marry-go-round.2 points -
Trump charged.
Unwoke and one other reacted to Separation Scientist for a topic
I never wear a hat, much less a red one. I never fly a flag. I have never lived in a trailer. I won't vote "because Trump got screwed". I will vote against the left, because the left is an immoral, perverted, hate filled, lying, Godless, violent political group controlled by enemies like Communist China, Russia, and George Soros, that want to seize complete control and destroy whatever remains of America. Clear enough for you, CB?2 points -
1 point
-
Trump charged.
LumRaiderFan reacted to 5GallonBucket for a topic
I’m not a red hatter and I didn’t vote for trump in primaries. Don’t own a red hat, flag or bumper sticker. he doesn’t consume my mind like he does yours1 point -
Idk if that would even matter… they have had baseball coaches before.. just not really any talent there… especially for a 6A1 point
-
Trump charged.
DonTheCon2024 reacted to CardinalBacker for a topic
Right.... so with the country on the line, the republicans are going to nominate a guy that can't win the election. The Dems are to blame for destroying the country, but the Republicans are even more to blame for not putting forth a candidate who could win the election in 2020 and it looks like 2024, either.1 point -
1 point
-
These 💩 charges are so serious they want have a hearing till December which means it will spill into the primaries and up coming election. Nothing but the weaponization of our Justice system to go after a political opponent which has been going on since he came down the escalator to announce his presidency in 2016. Total BS.1 point
-
Elon Musk has never been never known as a conservative. This is what he thinks about the NY Times. Lol1 point
-
If Donald Trump broke the law, why didn't they mention what law he broke in the indictment?1 point
-
Law Trivia and Discussions
thetragichippy reacted to tvc184 for a topic
In a timely fashion, the Beaumont Enterprise in my email headlines to says: Teens arrested for breaking and entering Hotel Beaumont Ooookay…. Arrested for Breaking and Entering. Well, they do say that in the movies. I guess reporters aren’t actually supposed to report. Then you go on to read the article, and it does not even mention burglary (B&E). The police, according to the article, said that going inside the old Hotel Beaumont is Trespassing. Not a question but a legal point, entering a location unlawfully can Trespassing or Burglary. It comes down to intent. For example: A burglary is entering a location not open to the public with intent to: 1. Commit a theft 2. Commit a felony or; 3. Commit an assault. Burglary is an “intent” (my description) crime. If you enter a location, it does not matter if you actually completed the theft or committed a felony or assault. If you intended to do it, the crime has been completed. Trespass has no required intent except to enter. Let’s say a homeless guy entered the old Hotel Beaumont in order to find a place to sleep to get out of the weather. He might’ve actually broken in by smashing a door. It is still not Burglary because there was no intent to do anything other than sleep. In another scenario, a guy goes to see his ex-girlfriend. He is arguing with her through an open front door of the house with her inside and him outside. She finally tells him to leave and start to shut the door. The guy puts his hand up to stop the door and reaches through with the other hand and slap her in the face and then leaves. In the two scenarios, the guy that caused damage to the hotel by smashing open door, then going completely inside to sleep, is guilty of class B misdemeanor Trespassing and has a maximum sentence of six months in jail. The guy that only stuck his arm through an open door and caused no damage to the home, is guilty of Burglary of a Habitation and has a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. That is because he “entered” with intent to commit an assault. Entry does not require a person to be completely inside but any part of the body or something attached to the body. To go a step further and play “what if”…. In the exact same scenario between the boyfriend and girlfriend, as she is closing the door, he reaches his hand through but this time has a knife in his hand and says “I’ll kill you”. He then leaves without injuring her. In that case, the guy entered with an intent to commit a felony, Aggravated Assault (displays a deadly weapon). So the guy caused no damage (the girlfriend opened the door), entered only with his hand and did not actually injure her. Oops, he could be looking at 99 years in prison. Here is the article from the Beaumont Enterprise but it might require a subscription to read. [Hidden Content]1 point -
Trump charged.
LumRaiderFan reacted to CardinalBacker for a topic
You’re not wrong… but they get mad when they are all lumped in as “deplorables.” Those on the far right (like the one who just labeled you) don’t realize that they are no different than the vagina hat wearing liberals screaming in conservative faces. They’re exactly the same.1 point -
Trump charged.
LumRaiderFan reacted to 5GallonBucket for a topic
I know we have Extremists on both sides but one side wants to allowing everything under the sun and the other side has to be a parent and say “no”1 point -
Trump charged.
Separation Scientist reacted to Unwoke for a topic
Your generalization of the left was accurate. The fact some on the left can’t see that makes liberalism a disease. Everything the woke left touches turns to 💩! Just look what’s been done to this country the last 2 1/2 years. It just seems to be overlooked which is scary in it self. They are miserable people who will never be happy till they destroy America then they’ll be bitching that they have nothing left to destroy.1 point -
Law Trivia and Discussions
LumRaiderFan reacted to tvc184 for a topic
Sometimes there is a lack of knowledge between the way people use words or phrases and the legal definitions of the words or phrases. It is like someone saying, my house got robbed. Legally that is impossible. In fact rob is used often by people to describe any theft or burglary, which it isn’t. I see on social media forums all the time people say something like, I was robbed. They then go on to say that when they woke up to go to work the next morning, somebody had taken their child’s bicycle. I understand the vernacular but it is Theft, not Robbery Here are the crimes listed. Burglary is a felony. It is what many (most?) states call Breaking and Entering (or the movie cops, B&E). Entering a closed business or a residence, usually by force (not against a person but prying open doors, shattering windows, etc.) is a serious and dangerous crime. Robbery is a criminal of violence. It is a theft with an assault. Think of a person pointing a gun and demanding money. Theft is just stealing. It is often called things like shoplifting. Like slide something into your pocket at a store and walk out. Legally there is a huge difference in what constitutes those crimes. So if people are escaping with property from a burglary or robbery (serious felonies) AND you have the “reasonable belief” that the force used was “immediately necessary” to recover your property, deadly force may be lawful. Theft does not include unlawful entry such as breaking into a closed business and it does not cover the use of force as in a robbery. In fact, there is no such crime as theft in the nighttime. There is just Theft. Obviously there is no justification for shooting a shoplifter from a store (Theft). Like, a guy stole a bag of Fritos so I shot him. Uhhhh, no. The law views stealing at nighttime differently. Basically Texas law allows the use of deadly force to protect property if you are stopping someone from getting away with your property if there’s a reasonable believe that you can’t recover the property later OR if trying to recover it would reasonably expose the victim to a substantial risk of serious injury. I can only speculate on the force for Theft but only committed at night. I believe that it probably has something to do with it being the nighttime/dark. A person is probably less likely to be able to identify the person/suspect at night and to run into the dark to chase someone might expose them to additional risks. The Texas legislature many decades ago decided that they Theft does not authorize deadly force but theft at nighttime and a person escaping with the property, may. Like the law… Hate the law… Agree or disagree… For now, I posted the current law.1 point -
Week 8 scores
Gametime5 reacted to WOSdrummer99 for a topic
Warren 26 Hardin 15 Chireno 0 Colmesneil 4 Hemphill 5 Woodville 6 Liberty 4 Hamshire-Fannett 2 Bridge City 2 LC-M 1 East Chambers 3 Anahuac 14 GC Memorial 12 PA Memorial 0 Huffman-Hargrave 10 Splendora 0 Bmt United 0 Kingwood 19 Dayton 0 Kingwood Park 7 Nederland 0 PN-G 11 Crosby 6 Baytown Sterling 11 point -
As fun as the tournament was with all of the upsets, I can't think of a final 4 that i've been less interested in.1 point
-
5AD1 Redemption
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to Cougtalk for a topic
I think all four will rebound but I think DR has the talent to be unstoppable most years.1 point -
There is no place on this board for your facts and logic.1 point
-
Law Trivia and Discussions
thetragichippy reacted to tvc184 for a topic
The point of hating the gun free zone is that it benefits no one but a criminal. Anyone that feels safe because a sign says it is safe, hasn’t been paying much attention. All the gun free zones do is to keep honest people from being there with a firearm for fear of being a felon. A criminal bent on mayhem has no such fear because he wants the outcome that he is likely to happen. Laws have two main purposes. One is a deterrent and the other is punishment if the deterrent didn’t work. Most people have a fear of being caught in a criminal act whether it’s a serious crime or a speeding ticket. They don’t want to do time in prison but they also don’t want to pay that $250 speeding ticket. Laws and logic simply don’t apply to a person who has decided to commit a mass murder.1 point -
3 paragraph post for a 5-2 loss, and only 2 sentences for a 4-2 win the day before. Nobody hates like you.1 point
-
Triplets
Silsbee92 reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
Silsbee had a pretty potent threesome this past season QB Mason Brisbane (3000 yards, 41 TD's) RB Kevin Martin (1200 yards, 15 TD's) WR Dre'lon Miller (1400 yards, 21 TD's)1 point -
Triplets
setxathlete14 reacted to navydawg31 for a topic
Nederland 2006 bunch was pretty lethal. 2 of them still hold records at NHS. Alex Moshier (QB) Micah Mosley (RB) Phillip Biehle (TE)1 point