Jump to content

Vidor vs Silsbee


Stangfan#1

Who wins?  

30 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 08/26/2022 at 11:00 PM

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Unwoke said:

Sounds like it’s going to be over 1:30 into the game, I wouldn’t worry about watching it.

I suppose Coach Matthews is probably breaking the bad news to the Pirates.  Sorry fellows but most of the Silsbee fans are saying you don’t have a chance.  Can’t hang with the Tigers.  Tigers going to donkey stomp the Pirates.  Yep, can see those heads hanging in the Pirates dressing room now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of them are not Tiger fans. Thing is you got teams that run the slot-T then you got the master at running the spot-T in Matthews. Vidor boys have been dreaming of running it since flag football and have been running it since JR. High. So unless there’s been move-ins playing in the backfield Vidor going to be ready. This has always been a good physical game and should be again. I won’t predict a score but as long as we win by one, we won. TigerNation!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game will be decided late in the 4th qtr , thanks to that darn slot T. When Vidor HC retires ( I hear probably year or two) an they go forth into the world of spread, then this will be an easy game for Tigers.

But dont be surprised if the weather don't win this one. That time of year for SETX.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Reagan said:

Something tells me this isn't going to be as close as some might think.  This will be Silsbee's night.  Now, if it rains, then all bets are off!

If Vidor has a night of no turnovers then they have a chance to keep this competitive an get a win but if they start having turnovers as in plural then it could get away from them. Just hoping to stay healthy with no injuries. That goes for both teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tigers need to put indoor practice facility on their xmas list for next project, cause I heard they have practiced more in the gym, than on the field. this week practice field is under water I'm told. During Two a days lightning was the problem almost every day. The high octane passing game might be a little out of sync early in the season , due to this I'd imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, JaspD55 said:

Tigers need to put indoor practice facility on their xmas list for next project, cause I heard they have practiced more in the gym, than on the field. this week practice field is under water I'm told. During Two a days lightning was the problem almost every day. The high octane passing game might be a little out of sync early in the season , due to this I'd imagine.

Let's go practice in Evadale

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...