Leaderboard

Sadly, a lot of school districts choose to let the pervert resign so they don't have to report it and take the time to go to court. If you remember several years ago a Memorial coach was jailed for this and when it came out that there were allegations at other schools, the girl sued those schools. I don't remember the outcome of the lawsuits. My favorite professor at Lamar, Coach John Payton, always told us to never be alone with any of your students. I have lived by his advice now for 33 years.

I'm sorry sir, you are incorrect on this one. I do this for a living. I'll keep the explanation as short as possible, but as long as your replies as the former employer are fact-based and not purposefully inflammatory, you can relay certain info about a previous employee to a prospective employer. Especially if the prospect in question has signed a release. Chapter 103 of the Texas Labor Code protects from defamation liability an employer who releases information about a current or former employee to a prospective new employer, unless "the information disclosed was known by that employer to be false at the time the disclosure was made or that the disclosure was made with malice or in reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the information disclosed." Follow my guidelines, and it will serve you well: Release only factual information Supply Only What Is Requested Tell the Truth Avoid Inflammatory Terms Use a Written Release Form

10-4A DII has 4 top 25 teams. #2 WO-S #14 Silsbee #19 Hamshire-Fannett #25 Shepherd Hardin-Jefferson and Jasper. This will be a very tough district.

For clarification: schools run a background check from the DPS database. If that comes back "clear", the school check references. Former employers are only technically allowed to provide 1. dates of employment 2. eligible for rehire yes/no 3. they may also provide safety info for DOT sensitive positions. Anything beyond the above listed information can expose the former employer to legal trouble. If they reveal unsubstantiated or unverified rumor type information that prevents a former employee from being hired, they can be subject to lawsuits.

That should be the take away. Our intelligence knows more than they are telling us. Which other administration eliminated their Navy and Air Force? I think if Obama or Biden had done this, the media would be reporting we are in much better shape then they are now.

Right. Didn't have any other choice but to let him go. That would be the case any where.

9 more weeks from today it begins 🙌🏾

Except, that's a lie beyond belief. The entire Iran military is gone, with the exception of a few random drones they still have hidden and even those have all but disappeared. The entire Iran leadership is gone, except for one or two that has to stay in hiding and cant travel freely or even use a cell phone. The entire Iran nuke stockpile is essentially gone, reduced to dust by the bunker busters. The entire Iran nuke enrichment labs are gone, reduced to rubble. Iran's ability to control the straight is gone. Iran's ability to rebuild is gone. The potential for Iran to become a nuke power is completely gone. The world is in awe of the US military, and the world now knows the former US Muslim president and the US dementia president is gone.

There's really no point engaging with that poster. He's a troll, he has a stage 5 case of TDS, he's been banned multiple times and keeps coming back creating new user accounts/names, thumbs his nose at forum rules and the moderators, and the best he has to offer is some drive-by post to try and stir things up. Meh.

Real Video of Reagan being baptized by Trump.

This is basic HR protocol and is correct. In that position, you absolutely cannot expose the entity you work for.

I understand the district‑talent argument, but let’s be real — lack of talent isn’t the other team’s fault. Every coach has to build around what they’ve got. Some schools have hoopers, some don’t. That’s the nature of high school sports. But that’s exactly why a shot clock doesn’t hurt the game. It doesn’t force anyone to play fast. It just forces everyone to play basketball. You can still run deliberate offense. You can still control tempo. You can still grind out possessions. A 35–40 second clock gives you more than enough time to run multiple actions. What it removes is the ability to stall for two minutes without any intent to score. That’s not “strategy.” That’s hiding behind the clock because you don’t have the talent to compete straight up. And diversity doesn’t disappear. College has a shot clock and you still see: • Princeton offenses • Ball‑screen heavy systems • Motion teams • Post‑dominant teams • Pack‑line defenses All completely different identities. The clock doesn’t erase style — it erases stalling. Most teams who want a shot clock already shoot within 45 seconds anyway. They’re not asking for help on offense. They’re asking for a rule that keeps the game competitive and keeps kids developing real basketball skills. High school players deserve: • More possessions • Real end‑of‑game situations • Preparation for the next level A shot clock doesn’t make everyone play the same. It just prevents one team from turning the game into a freeze‑tag contest because they don’t have the talent to compete possession‑to‑possession.

The writing was on the wall when the LLCA group in Woodville ran off the coach who took them to the state title game because he 'didn't use his athletes" like they wanted.

Astros win 7-5 in 10. Houston has now won 9 of their last 12 and have reached 2 games under .500 (42-44) for the first time since April 10 when they were 6-8.

Picture of Reagan and Baddog having their daily worship gathering of Trump.

On Thursday the Supreme Court handed down a big decision in the case of Mullin v. Al Otro Lado. It deals with the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 (INA) that allows people to seek asylum in the US. More specifically it deals with the definition of the word “in”. This kind of flashes back to the Bill Clinton deposition about Monica Lewinsky when he famously said when asked about sex with her, it depends on what the meaning of the word is, is. That’s right folks. We had a multi page Supreme Court decision on the definition of the word “IN”. Jumping ahead to give y’all time to think about it, it was a 6 to 3 vote on the definition of the word “in”. Guess which three did not agree with the definition? On with the show….. The INA said that a person may seek asylum when he “arrives in the United States”. That’s basically the case. Of course it goes on for pages to give other cases to explain the intent of the law, etc., however, the question is, can you apply for a political asylum in the United States when you were not the”in” United States? The answer was no, but here is the funny part. Justice Alito in authoring the decision to explain what being “in” the US actually means, wrote this: “The running back does not arrive in the end zone (and six points do not go up on the scoreboard) when he is tackled at the 1-yard line by the defense. The guest does not arrive in the house when the homeowner locks the door right before the guest tries to open it. The army does not arrive in the city when the city’s defenders repel the attack outside city limits. And the letter does not arrive in the mailbox when a dog assaults the carrier a step away from the mailbox. A person arrives in a destination only when he enters it, and that conclusion does not change because someone or something blocks entry. A person arrives in the United States, then, only when he enters it.” That’s about as simple and in plain English as you can get. Therr was no need for legalese to explain the situation. The dissent said that being outside of the US is the same as being in the US. 🤣🤣🤣 🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁 After the drum roll, the question that everyone has been wondering about…… which three justices did not agree that being in the United States meant being in the United States? Clue: One doesn’t know what a woman is.

Trump doesn't play. He's pretty well decimated very thing called Iran. He's sympathetic to the people. He knows what's he's doing. You honestly don't think he understands the situation?! BTW, I see you got another "laugh" response from the long-time tenant of the TDS cult. Again, tells me a lot!

Here are results for our coverage area teams participating this weekend: (some teams still have games to play today) Humble (1-2) vs. Lake Travis 68-56 W vs. Plano Prestonwood 57-66 L vs. South Oak Cliff 45-54 L CE King (2-1) vs. El Paso Andress 71-51 W vs. San Antonio Brennan 66-43 W vs. Dallas Episcopal 52-55 L Atascocita (2-1) vs. San Antonio Harlan 79-57 W vs. Cibolo Steele 56-43 W vs. Dallas Carter 49-63 L Beaumont West Brook (2-1) vs. Amarillo 54-59 L vs. Round Rock Westwood 48-30 W vs. Plano 56-38 W North Shore (3-0) vs. Prosper Walnut Grove 74-69 W vs. Plano West 73-65 W vs. Lancaster 58-56 W Barbers Hill (0-3) vs. Wichita Falls Memorial 36-54 L vs. Austin Bowie 41-58 L vs. Frisco Liberty 47-71 L Summer Creek (1-2) vs. Rowlett 54-60 L vs. Frisco Heritage 61-31 W vs. Tyler Legacy 45-67 L Beaumont United (2-1) vs. Leander Glenn 57-41 W vs. Georgetown East View 61-58 W vs. Boerne 59-61 L Baytown Sterling (2-1) vs. Frisco Reedy 55-44 W vs. DeSoto Kingdom Collegiate 67-57 W vs. Plano East 47-54 L Crosby (2-1) vs. Midlothian 54-57 L vs. Fort Worth Wyatt 57-43 W vs. San Angelo Central 54-53 W West Fork (2-1) vs. San Antonio Lanier 62-46 W vs. San Angelo Central 58-64 L vs. Midlothian 86-80 W Baytown Lee (1-2) vs. El Paso Hanks 49-68 L vs. San Antonio Burbank 69-57 W vs. Arlington Bowie 35-47 L Goose Creek Memorial (3-0) vs. Round Rock Cedar Ridge 61-27 W vs. Pflugerville 49-46 W vs. Euless Trinity 63-55 W Port Neches-Groves (3-0) vs. Austin Akins 51-50 W vs. Laredo Nixon 53-47 W vs. Celina 63-60 W Kingwood Park (3-0) vs. Tyler 48-41 W vs. Leander 33-18 W vs. Argyle 51-33 W Port Arthur Memorial (2-1) vs. New Braunfels 49-33 W vs. College Station 33-38 L vs. Dallas Hillcrest 62-47 W Kingwood (2-1) vs. Flower Mound Marcus 61-48 W vs. Coppell 66-71 L vs. Round Rock Stoney Point 52-39 W New Caney (2-1) vs. San Antonio Clark 62-43 W vs. A&M Consolidated 59-33 W vs. Prosper 47-58 L Splendora (0-3) vs. San Antonio Marshall 62-72 L vs. Sherman 50-53 L vs. Mesquite 63-71 L Onalaska (1-2) vs. Bridgeport 72-52 W vs. Tyler Chapel Hill 72-74 L vs. Paradise 46-65 L Pineywoods CA (2-1) vs. Blue Ridge 44-33 W vs. Dallas Wilmer Huchins 47-62 L vs. Atlanta 33-32 W Hardin-Jefferson (2-1) vs. Kerrville Tivy 54-50 W vs. DCA Prep 57-65 L vs. Hidalgo 62-25 W Tarkington (2-1) vs. Devine 73-66 W vs. Christian Home School 19-55 L vs. Florence 58-55 W Huntington (2-1) vs. Florence 33-44 L vs. Devine 56-43 W vs. ILTexas AGP 53-45 W Central Heights (0-3) vs. Leonard 53-75 L vs. Jim Ned 37-45 L vs. Cypress Christian 28-39 L Vidor (1-2) vs. Mabank 54-33 W vs. Lake Country Christian 45-55 L vs. Sanger 37-49 L Beaumont Kelly (0-3) vs. Argyle Liberty Christian 25-37 L vs. Comal Canyon Lake 48-55 L vs. Liberty Eylau 31-77 Bridge City (1-2) vs. Longview Pine Tree 39-56 L vs. Dallas Christian 45-55 L vs. Dallas Conrad 40-27 W Huffman (2-1) vs. Decatur 57-42 W vs. Dallas Bishop Dunne 55-43 W vs. Fort Worth Dunbar 44-46 L Evadale (1-2) vs. Forsan 36-51 L vs. Olton 44-43 W vs. Chilton 35-64 L Pollok Central (2-1) vs. Winona 66-44 W vs. Trinity Leadership Cedar Hill 49-44 W vs. Wichita Falls City View 37-57 L Buna (1-2) vs. Wichita Falls City View 30-48 L vs. Boyd 45-42 W vs. Trinity Leadership Cedar Hill 47-55 L Diboll (2-1) vs. Palmer 48-17 W vs. Arlington Sam Houston 44-33 W vs. Waco Robinson 64-72 L Shepherd (0-3) vs. Aubrey 15-81 L vs. Palmer 19-35 L vs. Arlington Sam Houston 7-34 L Orangefield (1-2) vs. Ponder 36-56 L vs. Lake Dallas 38-68 L vs. Geronimo Navarro 57-37 W Trinity (3-0) vs. Caddo Mills 51-30 W vs. Springtown 59-26 W vs. Ferris 71-51 W Silsbee (0-3) vs. Waxahachie Life 25-52 L vs. Frenship Memorial 48-58 L vs. El Campo 40-43 L West Orange-Stark (1-2) vs. El Campo 38-44 L vs. Waxahachie Life 40-62 L vs. Sulpher Springs 39-34 W Hamshire-Fannett (0-3) vs. Alvarado 47-57 L vs. Lindale 23-36 L vs. Somerset 39-46 L East Chambers (1-2) vs. Manor New Tech 59-71 L vs. Somerset 42-51 L vs. Alvarado 62-60 W Anderson-Shiro (2-1) vs. Poolville 52-43 W vs. Collinsville 63-39 W vs. Canadian 36-59 L Woden (2-1) vs. Prairiland 47-51 L vs. Poolville 44-40 W vs. Collinsville 55-35 W

No more delusional than you believing this would only take 2 weeks. Just sayin'.

Here's a pretty reliable think-tank assessment. It helps explain some of the confusion surrounding Iran's remaining capabilities. As I stated--regardless of propaganda--there's still a lot of unknowns. It doesn't discuss the nuclear issue in this piece. But, there's no verified intelligence assessment on the exact damage to Iran's nuclear program. There are summations. Those summations are based on incomplete intel. The only way to get a true accounting is to topple the regime by whatever means is required where direct intelligence can be gathered. That's part of the danger of any 'deal.' There's no true baseline without the regime's full cooperation--which won't be coming. I know "regime change" is a dirty phrase to many--if not most. But--in this case--it will probably be the only way. The Administration needs to make the case for it. Right now, the IRGC is helping make the case to other world leaders themselves. But, there are a lot of everyday people in America who believe something different. They need to be convinced. Educate them on how the current Iranian regime remaining in place will affect their gas prices, and every other good they purchase. Make it more than just about the nuclear program. Make it about day-to-day life and expenses. Tell them how Iran regulating oil through the Strait will affect their pocketbook. They should have plenty of recent evidence now. I'll agree it doesn't appear Iran can launch a nuclear warhead at this time. That's as far as I'll go as it relates to their nuke program status. I can guarantee that's as far as any internal intelligence assessment provided to POTUS will go. It won't provide definitive details. That's not how our assessments work unless the info is verified by multiple sources. What he does with the assessments he does receive from there is more of a political statement on his part for his own reasons. [Hidden Content]

I doubt the HC was even consulted about "cutting him". He wasn't going to have any say in this one.

Scores can be found at the link below; updates and highlights on the Dave Campbell's social media platforms [Hidden Content]

I think it’s safe to say he won’t ever step foot on a campus again…

Spin meaning that it’s a good deal. It’s not. Yeah Trump got it alright. Still waiting on the America First agenda to kick in! Sounds like you were right behind Reagan to get Baptized by Trump in the reflecting pool by Trump.

Houston has now won 7 of their last 9 and are 3 games under .500 (40-43) for the first time since April 15. Currently just 2 games back of division lead.

Did you mean coming back for the team or members on this website for our entertainment?

Houston wins 3-1. Astros have won 6 of their last 8. This is as close to .500 (39-43) as the Astros have been since April 16 when they were 8-12.

I agree. They both should be questioned about their actions. Where is Jasper school board now? They ran Crumedy off for less........

One has to question ol’ Foreman for not doing his due diligence! That’s raises a flag!

Perhaps an issue for another thread or even a different forum. This is happening too much. Celina was a big name that made all the headlines. How are the "coaches talking" and nothing has been done about it?

He would be in the same boat as Foreman if both knew. I am being told by many that Peveto had baggage from other stops and any one doing their due diligence would have to question his work ethics. Coaches talk.

Houston is halfway thru the season. (81 games). They are 38-43 (.469), 5 games under .500. Astros were season high of 11 games under .500 on May 20 (20-31). Since then Houston has gone 18-12 (.600) Astros are currently 3.5 back of division leader Seattle and 2 games back of final wildcard spot. In the 81 games played, Houston has used 79 different lineups due to injuries. They have played an MLB high of 49 players. Offensively: Astros are currently 16th (7th in AL) in hitting with a team batting average of .244. OBA of .318, SLG at .414 and OPS of .732. All those rank in top 10 of MLB. After the first 40 games of season, Astros were hitting around .265 and were top 3 in every offensive category. Last 40 games the offense has dropped to middle of the pack. Pitching: Houston is 27th in MLB (13th in AL) in team ERA at 4.81. OBA is .243 and WHIP is 1.41. In the first 50 games of season Houston's team ERA was around 6.4. Over the last 30 they have cut over 1.5 runs off the ERA. Houston pitching is definitely getting better and that is a very good sign for the rest of the season. Astros have 17 more games till All-Star break. If they can manage to get to .500 or better by that time, I really think Houston will have a great shot at making playoffs considering how the rest of the division is playing and how most of the AL is playing. The trend is a positive one.

Oh no. An 80 year old with jet lag dozing off. What’s the world coming to?

Interesting analysis in the studio show after the game. Described as not a huge win, but after giving up the lead the Stros avoided a big loss. Nice to see Pena's "cramp" yesterday was likely really a cramp. Never trust a MLB team discussing player Health.

Had a 10 speed automatic in my last truck. lol

Bellville 4A D2 #10 Robinson 4A D1 #17 Sealy 4A D1 Stafford 3A D1 #1 Columbus 4A D2 #8 Wimberley

Overdrive transmissions have also extended engine life...

PN-G's non-district schedule is pretty salty Port Arthur Memorial West Brook FB Crawford Brenham

Looks like they need a new defensive coordinator now

I did and should of kept it, but traded it in for a 2012 Ford F150 Ecoboost - biggest piece of junk I have ever purchased new. I had to replace timing chain at 94K. The 2011 I’m referring to I bought my son in high school. I paid 15,500 drive out and it had 100k miles on it. When he went to college, I took his truck and traded in my 2012 piece of crap and got him a new car because he was going to Texas State. I wanted to make sure he had something dependable since I would be about five hours away.

.

Astros take the 4 game series from the Tigers. What a game.

Trump could EASILY have sent the troops in and forcibly eliminated every last shred of the IRGC. We could have bombed the whole country to oblivion, destroyed their entire infrastructure, and turned Iran into a desert oil slick. He chose not to do that. Trump does not want to hurt the Iran people, nor do I want him to. So what would have happened if he had done this? The media and the left would have exploded with rage. 100%. They would scream about "American boots on the ground" and "innocent deaths" and called Trump a million (more) bad names. So he didn't. He brought an incredibly humane, surgical military operation to bear, and all but eliminated the head of the snake. He destroyed the Iran military and left their nuke program in rubble. He showed great restraint while accomplishing so much. So what happens now? People just want to complain, discredit, and nit pick everything he did do. The TDS consumed eternal critics will never be satisfied either way. If Trump does A, they scream he should have done B. If Trump does B, they scream he should have done A. If Trump claimed "water is wet", they would argue its not. TDS at its finest.

No it did need to be replayed. As much as the left has tried to destroy Trump since his first election which I totally disagree with it and can’t understand why no one has been held accountable, this 2nd term and his stupid decisions and narcissistic rambling of his mouth is ALL ON HIM. Keep making excuses for him. Lol Here let me post it again so you can watch it.

Trump has stated 38 times that a deal or breakthrough with Iran was imminent.

RR?

I can see you got a like from girlz for the personal attack. When you try to show Trump as the bad guy without explaining why Obama smuggled $400 million CASH to the Iranians, and his policies had no effect on their nuclear program shutdown, well then its’ simply lying by misinforming. Changing the subject and attacking instead of discussing your mistake is perfectly understandable. I also see you edited your post after mine. Good job.

Sadly im familiar this situation because I worked with his father at the plant for years and he was a good man god rest his soul. As far as the coach goes it was Facebook that did him in he had allegations of various kinds at LC-M Nederland Orangefield and Memorial. The young lady then sued Orangefield and Memorial but it was dismissed

5 straight series 4 game under 500 Hader 7 games with 6 saves with very few pitches .9 ERA

I saw an interview with a couple of Epstein's associates that said he would target fatherless girls. Not all daughters are as fortunate as yours or mine.