Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation since 06/09/2026 in all areas
-
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
bobbymcgee and 5 others reacted to AHUDDLESTON for a topic
Sadly, a lot of school districts choose to let the pervert resign so they don't have to report it and take the time to go to court. If you remember several years ago a Memorial coach was jailed for this and when it came out that there were allegations at other schools, the girl sued those schools. I don't remember the outcome of the lawsuits. My favorite professor at Lamar, Coach John Payton, always told us to never be alone with any of your students. I have lived by his advice now for 33 years.6 points -
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
NHSBulldogFan and 4 others reacted to PhatMack19 for a topic
5 points -
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
navydawg31 and 4 others reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
5 points -
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
setxathlete14 and 3 others reacted to BEARCPA for a topic
When their castoffs start enrolling at LCM.4 points -
Local Murders
bullets13 and 3 others reacted to SmashMouth for a topic
My youngest grandson may change your mind. I mean he's 3, but he's a bad 3. Lmao.4 points -
The Art of the Squeal
Separation Scientist and 3 others reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
Not surprising..... There would of been absolutely nothing he could of done that you would approved of. That's OK though - no money from US is being given to them, and if they don't live up to agreement, we have option to go back to bombing......4 points -
I'd stick with predicting elections, or something different. You've been wrong on this one from the very beginning.3 points
-
Iran War Update
Porter and 2 others reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
I believe both Vance and Trump have mentioned there are different groups that do not agree with the deal Trump is making with the current leadership. They have also mentioned that communication can take days because the gay leader does not want to give away his position. Taking that in to consideration along with the fact that none of the leadership is willing to go in public, there may be a leadership/communication problem..... So, to me that makes Slim's statement believable.3 points -
I know you’re not that nieve. His face is on the coin and his sons manage the companies.3 points
-
10-4A DII...... Local version of District of Doom???
BBfan061 and 2 others reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
10-4A DII has 4 top 25 teams. #2 WO-S #14 Silsbee #19 Hamshire-Fannett #25 Shepherd Hardin-Jefferson and Jasper. This will be a very tough district.3 points -
Trump Effect
Reagan and 2 others reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
I guess my point is getting into politics should not make one rich. Trump was already wealthy. Vast majority of other politicians were not until they got into politics.3 points -
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
Bulldogs92 and 2 others reacted to ladybug33 for a topic
Congrats to Coach Foreman and Coach T. over in Jasper. For all you bandwagon folks when things are good y'all on. Make up y'all mind Silver and Blue 4 ever., or not. For the Players drown out the noise and the negativity, get ready to pick up where we left off and build on that.3 points -
State 7on7 Interview with Beaumont United HC Drenard Williams
OlDawg and 2 others reacted to Matthew328 for a topic
[Hidden Content]3 points -
Another Supreme Court decision
thetragichippy and 2 others reacted to 5GallonBucket for a topic
Pretty sad and pathetic and probably demonic that people actually think that a male can be a female and vice versa. this is what happens when people fall away from the Word of God…. It trickles into our leaders and governing officials.3 points -
Probably a slow year this year as stated several times already,I would imagine recruiting is in full swing though!3 points
-
This Supreme Court decision may be HUGE….
5GallonBucket and 2 others reacted to tvc184 for a topic
The Supreme Court just granted certiorari or review to two cases for the next term. These cases deal with the ban on AR-15 and other “assault” rifles. The Supreme Court has finally decided to step in and rule whether a government can prohibit semi automatic rifles under the Second Amendment. By the time they schedule oral arguments to hear the cases and then write an opinion, it will probably be near the end of the term at about this time next year. So the can is no longer going to be kicked down the road. We are about to soon find out if about half a dozen states are violating the Constitution by prohibiting the possession of certain semi automatic weapons. Did I mention that I think this is huge?3 points -
The law is the law, unintended consequences and all.3 points
-
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
TxHoops and 2 others reacted to Matthew328 for a topic
He'd be insane to comment publicly about that situation3 points -
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
Reagan and 2 others reacted to SmashMouth for a topic
I'm sorry sir, you are incorrect on this one. I do this for a living. I'll keep the explanation as short as possible, but as long as your replies as the former employer are fact-based and not purposefully inflammatory, you can relay certain info about a previous employee to a prospective employer. Especially if the prospect in question has signed a release. Chapter 103 of the Texas Labor Code protects from defamation liability an employer who releases information about a current or former employee to a prospective new employer, unless "the information disclosed was known by that employer to be false at the time the disclosure was made or that the disclosure was made with malice or in reckless disregard for the truth or falsity of the information disclosed." Follow my guidelines, and it will serve you well: Release only factual information Supply Only What Is Requested Tell the Truth Avoid Inflammatory Terms Use a Written Release Form3 points -
UIL on shot clock usage
PlayActionPass and 2 others reacted to Mamba for a topic
I understand the district‑talent argument, but let’s be real — lack of talent isn’t the other team’s fault. Every coach has to build around what they’ve got. Some schools have hoopers, some don’t. That’s the nature of high school sports. But that’s exactly why a shot clock doesn’t hurt the game. It doesn’t force anyone to play fast. It just forces everyone to play basketball. You can still run deliberate offense. You can still control tempo. You can still grind out possessions. A 35–40 second clock gives you more than enough time to run multiple actions. What it removes is the ability to stall for two minutes without any intent to score. That’s not “strategy.” That’s hiding behind the clock because you don’t have the talent to compete straight up. And diversity doesn’t disappear. College has a shot clock and you still see: • Princeton offenses • Ball‑screen heavy systems • Motion teams • Post‑dominant teams • Pack‑line defenses All completely different identities. The clock doesn’t erase style — it erases stalling. Most teams who want a shot clock already shoot within 45 seconds anyway. They’re not asking for help on offense. They’re asking for a rule that keeps the game competitive and keeps kids developing real basketball skills. High school players deserve: • More possessions • Real end‑of‑game situations • Preparation for the next level A shot clock doesn’t make everyone play the same. It just prevents one team from turning the game into a freeze‑tag contest because they don’t have the talent to compete possession‑to‑possession.3 points -
For clarification: schools run a background check from the DPS database. If that comes back "clear", the school check references. Former employers are only technically allowed to provide 1. dates of employment 2. eligible for rehire yes/no 3. they may also provide safety info for DOT sensitive positions. Anything beyond the above listed information can expose the former employer to legal trouble. If they reveal unsubstantiated or unverified rumor type information that prevents a former employee from being hired, they can be subject to lawsuits.3 points
-
Another Supreme Court case or maybe just comedy….
thetragichippy and 2 others reacted to tvc184 for a topic
On Thursday the Supreme Court handed down a big decision in the case of Mullin v. Al Otro Lado. It deals with the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 (INA) that allows people to seek asylum in the US. More specifically it deals with the definition of the word “in”. This kind of flashes back to the Bill Clinton deposition about Monica Lewinsky when he famously said when asked about sex with her, it depends on what the meaning of the word is, is. That’s right folks. We had a multi page Supreme Court decision on the definition of the word “IN”. Jumping ahead to give y’all time to think about it, it was a 6 to 3 vote on the definition of the word “in”. Guess which three did not agree with the definition? On with the show….. The INA said that a person may seek asylum when he “arrives in the United States”. That’s basically the case. Of course it goes on for pages to give other cases to explain the intent of the law, etc., however, the question is, can you apply for a political asylum in the United States when you were not the”in” United States? The answer was no, but here is the funny part. Justice Alito in authoring the decision to explain what being “in” the US actually means, wrote this: “The running back does not arrive in the end zone (and six points do not go up on the scoreboard) when he is tackled at the 1-yard line by the defense. The guest does not arrive in the house when the homeowner locks the door right before the guest tries to open it. The army does not arrive in the city when the city’s defenders repel the attack outside city limits. And the letter does not arrive in the mailbox when a dog assaults the carrier a step away from the mailbox. A person arrives in a destination only when he enters it, and that conclusion does not change because someone or something blocks entry. A person arrives in the United States, then, only when he enters it.” That’s about as simple and in plain English as you can get. Therr was no need for legalese to explain the situation. The dissent said that being outside of the US is the same as being in the US. 🤣🤣🤣 🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁 After the drum roll, the question that everyone has been wondering about…… which three justices did not agree that being in the United States meant being in the United States? Clue: One doesn’t know what a woman is.3 points -
The Art of the Squeal
OlDawg and 2 others reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
That should be the take away. Our intelligence knows more than they are telling us. Which other administration eliminated their Navy and Air Force? I think if Obama or Biden had done this, the media would be reporting we are in much better shape then they are now.3 points -
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
navydawg31 and 2 others reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
Right. Didn't have any other choice but to let him go. That would be the case any where.3 points -
2026 Toughest Non District Slate
navydawg31 and 2 others reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity for a topic
9 more weeks from today it begins 🙌🏾3 points -
The Art of the Squeal
Boyz N Da Hood and 2 others reacted to Separation Scientist for a topic
Except, that's a lie beyond belief. The entire Iran military is gone, with the exception of a few random drones they still have hidden and even those have all but disappeared. The entire Iran leadership is gone, except for one or two that has to stay in hiding and cant travel freely or even use a cell phone. The entire Iran nuke stockpile is essentially gone, reduced to dust by the bunker busters. The entire Iran nuke enrichment labs are gone, reduced to rubble. Iran's ability to control the straight is gone. Iran's ability to rebuild is gone. The potential for Iran to become a nuke power is completely gone. The world is in awe of the US military, and the world now knows the former US Muslim president and the US dementia president is gone.3 points -
The Art of the Squeal
baddog and 2 others reacted to Slim Charles for a topic
There's really no point engaging with that poster. He's a troll, he has a stage 5 case of TDS, he's been banned multiple times and keeps coming back creating new user accounts/names, thumbs his nose at forum rules and the moderators, and the best he has to offer is some drive-by post to try and stir things up. Meh.3 points -
Real Video of Reagan being baptized by Trump.3 points
-
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
OleCoog and 2 others reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
He would be in the same boat as Foreman if both knew. I am being told by many that Peveto had baggage from other stops and any one doing their due diligence would have to question his work ethics. Coaches talk.3 points -
100% Better Times
tvc184 and 2 others reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
That is easy to say, but I'm not sure more perception than reality. Trust me, my Dad built me a 65 Mustang from the ground up and gave to me for my 16th birthday in 1982, custom paint job and all.....so I know where you're going, but.... My work Truck is a 2011 Ford F150 Lariat 5.0 Coyote engine......When I parked her at work today, her milage was 309800. She has original engine and transmission. I don't recall 1960's or 1970's vehicles getting that kind of milage out of original engine. The only things that don't work are key fob....cause my ex-wife washed it...SMH - and the rearview camera (cause I don't wanna fix it) I don't drive her any further than I want to toe her home......but she makes he drive from Port Arthur to Vidor 5 days a week, plus around town on the weekends.3 points -
2026 Astros
rupert3 and 2 others reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
One game ain't going to kill us. Now, if you ever become a season ticket holder, then we have a problem. Might have to give them to me.3 points -
March 8,2026 — WTI Crude Hits $110. THANKS TRUMP
OlDawg and 2 others reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
I paid I $3.19 today. In a couple weeks it should be well under $3.003 points -
March 8,2026 — WTI Crude Hits $110. THANKS TRUMP
OlDawg and 2 others reacted to Separation Scientist for a topic
Update: gas is now $2.99 in west Chambers Co.3 points -
Austin Metcalf Case
thetragichippy and 2 others reacted to baddog for a topic
The 17 year old who filmed himself urinating on Austin Metcalf’s grave and posting it on the internet, has been arrested.3 points -
UIL on shot clock usage
rupert3 and 2 others reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
I hope Texas high school basketball never gets a shot clock in my lifetime.3 points -
District 9-5A D1 Thread 2026/2027
Mr. Buddy Garrity and one other reacted to Austin1985 for a topic
If so, I called it in real life, offline lol2 points -
2026 Astros
rupert3 and one other reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
I just want .500 by All Star break. Current record is 43-46. Nine games remaining before break. Last 3 are against division leader Arlington. 6-3 will put us at .500. It's doable.2 points -
Also, on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Slaughter. Articles I, II and III in the Constitution list the separation of powers. Article II gives the president complete control over the Executive Branch of government. The FTC is under the authority of the Executive Branch. It is therefore controlled by one person, the president. Trump came into office and fired two members of the FTC because they were appointed by Democrats and they did not agree with Trump‘s position. For that reason, Trump said, you’re fired! One of them, Rebecca Slaughter did not like that. He filed a lawsuit saying that you can’t fire me. A 1935 lawsuit ruled on by the Supreme Court said that Congress funds and created the FTC so the president cannot fire anyone on a commission that he and only he is ahead of. So basically, he cannot fire his own employee even though the his employee said, I don’t agree with your agenda, Mr. President. So Trump took to court and the circuit court said, yes, Mr. President, you were prohibited from finding members of a commission that you and only you are ahead of. You are forced to work with people that do not want to work for you or for your agenda Trump has been appealed to the Supreme Court. On Monday, the Supreme Court in a 6 to 3 decision said, what kind of nonsense is this. Sure, a president can fire a member of an executive commission that he alone controls. Who wants to work with a subordinate who can basically tell you to get screwed? So just because Congress does not like it, under the separation of powers, they do not control executive committees and commissions. Congress can create committees but once created, they are under the authority of the president and can be terminated. Again, the vote was 6 to 3 that the president alone in Article II, controls the Executive Branch. Any guesses on which 3 justices said to heck with Article II, the president should not be able to control all aspects of his administration?2 points
-
Birthright Citizenship
DCT and one other reacted to SmashMouth for a topic
It was 6/3, I'm pretty sure. While I don't really like the outcome, I believe it was the correct ruling based on Constitutional law.2 points -
Jasper is Open... Crumedy leaving for FB Travis/Toby Foreman hired
SmashMouth and one other reacted to mat for a topic
Falcon needs to jump on over to the political forum. They'd fit right in.2 points -
I never seen a country so determined to destroy itself. Smh2 points
-
2026 Astros
baddog and one other reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
Astros win 7-5 in 10. Houston has now won 9 of their last 12 and have reached 2 games under .500 (42-44) for the first time since April 10 when they were 6-8.2 points -
Trump doesn't play. He's pretty well decimated very thing called Iran. He's sympathetic to the people. He knows what's he's doing. You honestly don't think he understands the situation?! BTW, I see you got another "laugh" response from the long-time tenant of the TDS cult. Again, tells me a lot!2 points
-
Here's a pretty reliable think-tank assessment. It helps explain some of the confusion surrounding Iran's remaining capabilities. As I stated--regardless of propaganda--there's still a lot of unknowns. It doesn't discuss the nuclear issue in this piece. But, there's no verified intelligence assessment on the exact damage to Iran's nuclear program. There are summations. Those summations are based on incomplete intel. The only way to get a true accounting is to topple the regime by whatever means is required where direct intelligence can be gathered. That's part of the danger of any 'deal.' There's no true baseline without the regime's full cooperation--which won't be coming. I know "regime change" is a dirty phrase to many--if not most. But--in this case--it will probably be the only way. The Administration needs to make the case for it. Right now, the IRGC is helping make the case to other world leaders themselves. But, there are a lot of everyday people in America who believe something different. They need to be convinced. Educate them on how the current Iranian regime remaining in place will affect their gas prices, and every other good they purchase. Make it more than just about the nuclear program. Make it about day-to-day life and expenses. Tell them how Iran regulating oil through the Strait will affect their pocketbook. They should have plenty of recent evidence now. I'll agree it doesn't appear Iran can launch a nuclear warhead at this time. That's as far as I'll go as it relates to their nuke program status. I can guarantee that's as far as any internal intelligence assessment provided to POTUS will go. It won't provide definitive details. That's not how our assessments work unless the info is verified by multiple sources. What he does with the assessments he does receive from there is more of a political statement on his part for his own reasons. [Hidden Content]2 points
-
Oh no. An 80 year old with jet lag dozing off. What’s the world coming to?2 points
-
2026 Toughest Non District Slate
Darth Texas and one other reacted to BBfan061 for a topic
Bellville 4A D2 #10 Robinson 4A D1 #17 Sealy 4A D1 Stafford 3A D1 #1 Columbus 4A D2 #8 Wimberley2 points -
District 9-5A D1 Thread 2026/2027
WOSdrummer99 and one other reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity for a topic
For folks (subscribers) waiting on the DCTF mag it should be coming in starting next week. 🙌🏾 Mine comes in between Wednesday and Friday.2 points -
Covid 19 Vaccine Study
Reagan and one other reacted to 5GallonBucket for a topic
Never took the shot and never was a thought common sense to me2 points -
2 points
-
Incoming freshman class looked pretty good at the Kountze Summer League. There's of course still plenty of rough edges, but they handled business. Good news is the one kid I was worried about leaving to play elsewhere appears to be staying put.2 points