Jump to content

Vidor is open !!


lcm93

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

ALVIN CREDEUR
7 years 34-39-0
2006    Lumberton       4-6-0
2007    Lumberton    11-2-0 C
2008    Lumberton      8-2-0 C
2009    Lumberton      5-5-0
2010    Lumberton      5-5-0
2011    Lumberton      1-9-0
2012    Lumberton     0-10-0

I was pretty familiar with the record. Lol. I was just wondering what Mr. Melon's comment would be. This will be an introduction to a broader and already beaten to death topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

ALVIN CREDEUR
7 years 34-39-0
2006    Lumberton       4-6-0
2007    Lumberton    11-2-0 C
2008    Lumberton      8-2-0 C
2009    Lumberton      5-5-0
2010    Lumberton      5-5-0
2011    Lumberton      1-9-0
2012    Lumberton     0-10-0

He's another  member of the SUB CLUB

He had some excellent players for 2 years in Lumberton. His play calling was horrendous in Vidor and he dismantled the offense .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, DP#1FAN said:

Go get the coach from Anahuac!

"Go get the coach from...."

As stated countless times:  Most "not so great schools" don't pay enough money to attract a quality, well known, big name coach.  And if you want a coach that's NOT ON THE APPLICANT LIST, you need even more money than that.  The amount you didn't have to start with I mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, oldschool2 said:

"Go get the coach from...."

As stated countless times:  Most "not so great schools" don't pay enough money to attract a quality, well known, big name coach.  And if you want a coach that's NOT ON THE APPLICANT LIST, you need even more money than that.  The amount you didn't have to start with I mean.

Vidor  paid Mathews pretty well if I remember correctly. I could be wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Separation Scientist said:

I doubt the Anahuac coach would leave to go to Vidor. Anahuac has some good years soon ahead of it.   

Neece use to live in Vidor and I would love to have him as a coach but.................Greg would clean house and bring his own coaches with him and they wont  have that in Vidor.  Vidors already got their guy though, he's been promised the job for a few years now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2023 at 4:57 AM, Mr. Thornton Melon said:

He's another  member of the SUB CLUB

He had some excellent players for 2 years in Lumberton. His play calling was horrendous in Vidor and he dismantled the offense .

Are you saying that if Vidor had excellent players, then the coaching wouldn't matter? If so, that would mean that the success of Vidor (or lack thereof) has little or nothing to do with Jeff or Alvin, rather than the lower level of athletes in Vidor...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

Are you saying that if Vidor had excellent players, then the coaching wouldn't matter? If so, that would mean that the success of Vidor (or lack thereof) has little or nothing to do with Jeff or Alvin, rather than the lower level of athletes in Vidor...

I can agree to an extent. Some groups of kids are better than others upcoming. Lumberton is said to be in that window now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bigdog said:

whoever Vidor hires, they better do it pretty quick.   They are running out of offseason.  If it is someone who is going to run the same system then its not that big of a problem.  But if its someone changing it up then that's more of an issue.

I didn't realize it til you posted this, only around 5 months and change til 2-a-days start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, setxathlete14 said:

I can agree to an extent. Some groups of kids are better than others upcoming. Lumberton is said to be in that window now.

He continually complains about Matthews and Credeur, etc. but tries to explain Credeur's success with "some excellent players". I was just pointing out Mr. Melon's poor reasoning skills...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

I didn't realize it til you posted this, only around 5 months and change til 2-a-days start. 

Yep.  Not much time for a new coach to get assistants hired if needed, get up to speed on the players and possibly install a new system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, purpleeagle said:

Vidor does not pay enough money. Anahuac has the money, that’s how they got him from newton. However if Vidor did hire him, he would build a team better than anything Vidor has ever had. 

He can take average and make really good! I agree with you Purpleeagle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I have been told, there is a reason a hire has not been made. It was stated that Mathews would officially leave June 1st. Well, that will make 1 year from when a certain coach had retired. In Texas, you have to sit out one year after retirement to go back to work for a Texas ISD. That's the law.

Now, that doesn't mean that this coach can't come in now and start working with the team but he cannot be officially on the payroll.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

From what I have been told, there is a reason a hire has not been made. It was stated that Mathews would officially leave June 1st. Well, that will make 1 year from when a certain coach had retired. In Texas, you have to sit out one year after retirement to go back to work for a Texas ISD. That's the law.

Now, that doesn't mean that this coach can't come in now and start working with the team but he cannot be officially on the payroll.

I can believe that. I would think some of the coaches that went to Louisiana would be starting to come back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Has any team won a State Title running an offense "exactly" like Vidor does?  I know Liberty Hill runs the same offense.  Liberty Hill won 2 State Titles in 06-07.  But, at LH, Did Jerry Vance run this same type offense during this time?  

Back in the day, a lot teams ran this offense or something very similar. So the answer to your question would be yes.

Now if you need to narrow your question to more recent years, then so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Has any team won a State Title running an offense "exactly" like Vidor does?  I know Liberty Hill runs the same offense.  Liberty Hill won 2 State Titles in 06-07.  But, at LH, Did Jerry Vance run this same type offense during this time?  

Teams not running out of the spread can still win state championships in the modern era just ask West Orange-Stark fans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Back in the day, a lot teams ran this offense or something very similar. So the answer to your question would be yes.

Now if you need to narrow your question to more recent years, then so be it.

I see your point.  But I underlined "exactly" for a reason.  Sure, there has been teams in the past that has ran the Slot-T and Slot-I and has won State Titles.  But what Vidor and Liberty hill does is a might different.  They have a tight slot and tight splits.  They run to the line and run the play that's called as quick as possible hoping to confuse the defense with misdirection.  But, this really does not leave room for anything else to happen.  You can't really have some sort-of passing game.  About all you can do is play-action passes.  I guess you could run to the line, then drop straight back and let routes develop.  Of course you won't do any coverage reading running to the line and taking the quick snap.  Plus, I doubt there can be any audibles taking place.  So, again, has any team, let's start from 1970, running Vidor's type offense, won any State Titles?  

PS -- Ethridge ran the Slot-T and Slot-I.  But he also incorporated a flanker set.  He had a pretty good passing system that augmented his running attack.  But, his QB's didn't run to the line and quickly take the snap.  Point is, I'm thinking, is you have to have some sort of a passing game.  This is why I asked the main question.  Maybe you don't don't need a passing game.  Well, other than play-action passes.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Reagan said:

I see your point.  But I underlined "exactly" for a reason.  Sure, there has been teams in the past that has ran the Slot-T and Slot-I and has won State Titles.  But what Vidor and Liberty hill does is a might different.  They have a tight slot and tight splits.  They run to the line and run the play that's called as quick as possible hoping to confuse the defense with misdirection.  But, this really does not leave room for anything else to happen.  You can't really have some sort-of passing game.  About all you can do is play-action passes.  I guess you could run to the line, then drop straight back and let routes develop.  Of course you won't do any coverage reading running to the line and taking the quick snap.  Plus, I doubt there can be any audibles taking place.  So, again, has any team, let's start from 1970, running Vidor's type offense, won any State Titles?  

PS -- Ethridge ran the Slot-T and Slot-I.  But he also incorporated a flanker set.  He had a pretty good passing system that augmented his running attack.  But, his QB's didn't run to the line and quickly take the snap.  Point is, I'm thinking, is you have to have some sort of a passing game.  This is why I asked the main question.  Maybe you don't don't need a passing game.  Well, other than play-action passes.  

The biggest differences between Vidor and Liberty Hill have nothing to do with small discrepancies in how they run the same offense.  `

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,895
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    ronanhugo529
    Newest Member
    ronanhugo529
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yeah I remember the pictures of the water piled up on the north side of the highway, it was bad.
    • That’s a president? How embarrassing. 
    • Really good hire! As I stated previously on this thread, Mike T has been an essential part of WB’s success the last few years & is a student of the game & I have a ton of respect for how he goes about things as a coach. Big on teaching kids how to do things the right way to prepare them for not only basketball but the game of life. He’ll be fine there, my only question is what kind of talent does WB have returning?  Best thing about this situation for Mike T is WB will be 5A for at least the next 2 years, so he should win a lot of games & have some deep playoff runs.
    • So which coaches kid gets the QB job? Trotter or Barrier
    • A Winnie land owner (and others) sued the State of Texas after they built IH-10 a few feet higher in order to help contain storm flooding. Sure enough a hurricane hit and flooded the land. The storm improvements worked!! Unfortunately the state sacrificed several people’s properties in using the interstate highway as a dam.  Richard DeVillier tried to sue Texas under our laws and Constitution and the US Constitution under the Fifth Amendment “taking clause” (eminent domain). After a favorable ruling in the federal district court on the right to sue Texas directly, the Fifth Circuit Court in New Orleans overturned that ruling and said that the DeVlier had no authority to sue Texas directly.  On Tuesday a unanimous US Supreme Court ruled that DeVillier and others had the right to sue Texas directly under Texas law and under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. The case is now sent back down to the lower court. DeVillier and others have not won their lawsuits as the case has not been decided on its merits at a trial. He still has to go to prove his case. What they did win was a unanimous Supreme Court agreeing that he has the right to bring Texas to trial for taking his property with just compensation.   
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...