Jump to content

Bridge City vs WOS


adminbaberuth

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, gronkykong17 said:

I have been to a lot of WO-S football games in my life, and there is one thing you that WO-S is great at... STOPPING THE RUN. You don't run the ball on WO-S. You cannot run the ball up the middle because you run into Mr. King (4yr. Starter). and you cant run the ball outside because then you go right into WO-S bread and Butter and thats there speed. There is not a team in the Area that can hang with WO-S.  So saying that, I'll take WO-S getting the 3rd straight shutout in blowout form.

WO-S- 48
BC- 0 

you are mostly right, but don't say "don't and cannot" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

 

There's eight pages of people saying that we don't belong on the field with the mighty mustangs.  I hope you guys realize that we haven't played our starters in the second half this year, either.  Hell, we didn't even have our leading rusher in the game last Friday.  

It doesn't matter.... the game still has to be played.  

Good for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rake1 said:

BC fans remember a "very fast" Morris from WOS getting caught from behind in the 2011 game so it's possible. As a fan I'd like to see Denton and Morris in a foot race or chasing one another on the field! They can both fly!! Great athletes!!

 

Rake1  

You're right about that.  BOTH of those kids can fly 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, The Icon said:

The Flying WOS aka Chain Gang ROLLS BC

WOS 40+

BC may score if Thompson feels like giving up his first shutout of the season

If or when BC scores, make no mistake about it, they will have earned it. We (WOS) will not give away a score especially not the first score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

 

There's eight pages of people saying that we don't belong on the field with the mighty mustangs.  I hope you guys realize that we haven't played our starters in the second half this year, either.  Hell, we didn't even have our leading rusher in the game last Friday.  

It doesn't matter.... the game still has to be played.  

For the record, I have been on the BC bandwagon since they hired Dubois (before last season started).  There weren't many of us that predicted a winning record for the Cards last season.  So I'm not slamming them.  This is just a different animal.  

I am HOPING for a good, competitive game.  I'm just not necessarily expecting one...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like bridge city will score Friday night no big deal good for them . ok  now we get scored on don't leave the stands you and I know  it was going to happen down the line don't you think. coach dubois has a lot to work  with there at bridge city this year and it has shown in there last two games dubois likes the ball control game STOP ME IF YOU CAN that's the  type of football he likes good for him. coach thmpson and the coaching staff have seen this type of offensive before from better teams than  bridge city sorry coach dubois  jmo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, td said:

I'm not sure who you're talking about but it's a message board and it's meant for people to talk ish. Wait until it's your son that they're talking about. Lol. You have to learn not to take it too serious. It's all in fun. 

I might have used the wrong words. I just think bc deserves more respect than we are getting on here lol. IMO this will be one of Wos and Bridge city's toughest games of the year and people are on here acting like bc is Sabine pass or something lol . No offense shark fans ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, BC Cardinal97 said:

I might have used the wrong words. I just think bc deserves more respect than we are getting on here lol. IMO this will be one of Wos and Bridge city's toughest games of the year and people are on here acting like bc is Sabine pass or something lol . No offense shark fans ;)

These are fans talking. Doesn't mean a thing. They are entitled to their opinion just as you are. Neither opinion puts points on the board. The game will b decided by the players Friday night. If the fans are wrong, just think how much ish you get to talk Saturday morning!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TxHoops said:

For the record, I have been on the BC bandwagon since they hired Dubois (before last season started).  There weren't many of us that predicted a winning record for the Cards last season.  So I'm not slamming them.  This is just a different animal.  

I am HOPING for a good, competitive game.  I'm just not necessarily expecting one...

I want a competitive game too. I just don't know if BC has enough to keep them under 40pts. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We fans talk trash on this site but WO-S football players do not. I personally, do not care if BC scores or not. WO wins this game by how ever many points are on the board at the last tick on the clock.  Since I live in Houston I can speak on the team BC played last Friday night, they are not a good football team, nor do they care about football as much as they do about basketball,  so I would not be bragging about that win last week too much if I were BC. My prediction is that there will be a lot of hard hitting from the # 1 defense in 4A division2  in the sate of Texas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

BC is over hyped and it will show these next few weeks. They will lose by 30+ to WOS and by 20+ to Newton. BC doesn't have enough speed on defense and that offense can be figured out by a good DC.

Classic response right here. "Over hyped" would be Tim Tebow in baseball, Johnny Manziel in anything, and the last 2 George Clooney movies. Having 2 very proud Cardinal fans engaging in some banter on a message board would hardly qualify as being overhyped. Nobody, and I mean nobody, outside of BC even remotely gives the Cards a chance in this game and we have 9 pages on this thread to prove it. WOS is the heaviest of favorites and with good reason. Let those "underdog" fans take up for their team, it's what makes sports great.

 

Rake1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ladybug33 said:

We fans talk trash on this site but WO-S football players do not. I personally, do not care if BC scores or not. WO wins this game by how ever many points are on the board at the last tick on the clock.  Since I live in Houston I can speak on the team BC played last Friday night, they are not a good football team, nor do they care about football as much as they do about basketball,  so I would not be bragging about that win last week too much if I were BC. My prediction is that there will be a lot of hard hitting from the # 1 defense in 4A division2  in the sate of Texas.

Last I checked no bc fans talked about last weeks win. Wos fans have been talking about history more than anyone. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Rake1 said:

Classic response right here. "Over hyped" would be Tim Tebow in baseball, Johnny Manziel in anything, and the last 2 George Clooney movies. Having 2 very proud Cardinal fans engaging in some banter on a message board would hardly qualify as being overhyped. Nobody, and I mean nobody, outside of BC even remotely gives the Cards a chance in this game and we have 9 pages on this thread to prove it. WOS is the heaviest of favorites and with good reason. Let those "underdog" fans take up for their team, it's what makes sports great.

 

Rake1

Name those 2 George Clooney movies! Don't be hate'n lmao!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • The problem as well as that all of the social justice warriors, influencers, and instigators repeat these lies in the immediate days after the event, garnering outrage.  But when they're proven false they never go back and rescind their outrage-causing posts, they just move on to the next one.
    • I just find it really hard to believe that Trump will select a VP based on the votes they bring him.  He's going to want a Trumper that will affirm his every move and stoke his ego.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I doubt it.  And as you said, in these battle ground states a few tenths of a % point may be enough to swing the whole election.  Trump can't afford a VP who will cost him votes (Noem would cost him full points, not just tenths), but also needs a candidate that will bring in as many votes as possible.  So hopefully whichever Trump disciple he chooses has some political appeal to swing voters.
    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...