Jump to content

High School Baseball

Some of the best baseball in Texas is played here in SETX-Discuss Here!


Subforums

  1. SETX Baseball History and Factoids

    History of Area Races as well as Local Players Done Good!

    870
    posts

4,346 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 221 views
    • 0 replies
    • 144 views
    • 2 replies
    • 577 views
    • 0 replies
    • 207 views
    • 0 replies
    • 219 views
    • 0 replies
    • 304 views
    • 0 replies
    • 360 views
    • 0 replies
    • 177 views
    • 0 replies
    • 272 views
    • 0 replies
    • 203 views
    • 4 replies
    • 622 views
    • 1 reply
    • 326 views
    • 1 reply
    • 245 views
    • 1 reply
    • 190 views
    • 4 replies
    • 473 views
    • 0 replies
    • 232 views
    • 0 replies
    • 167 views
    • 0 replies
    • 389 views
    • 0 replies
    • 148 views
    • 0 replies
    • 165 views
    • 0 replies
    • 259 views
    • 0 replies
    • 180 views
    • 0 replies
    • 164 views
    • 0 replies
    • 267 views
    • 3 replies
    • 962 views
    • 0 replies
    • 340 views
    • 0 replies
    • 263 views
    • 0 replies
    • 174 views
  1. Standings

    • 1 reply
    • 911 views
    • 1 reply
    • 690 views
  2. State Tournament

    • 6 replies
    • 294 views
    • 9 replies
    • 1.3k views
    • 1 reply
    • 575 views
  3. Stats

    • 1 reply
    • 262 views
    • 0 replies
    • 261 views
    • 0 replies
    • 951 views
    • 0 replies
    • 187 views
    • 0 replies
    • 533 views
    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
    • 23 replies
    • 1.9k views
    • 24 replies
    • 1.7k views
    • 5 replies
    • 2.2k views
    • 0 replies
    • 231 views
    • 0 replies
    • 252 views
    • 6 replies
    • 1.2k views
    • 1 reply
    • 487 views
    • 1 reply
    • 261 views
    • 1 reply
    • 476 views
    • 1 reply
    • 382 views
    • 5 replies
    • 908 views
    • 1 reply
    • 522 views
    • 2 replies
    • 519 views
    • 1 reply
    • 501 views
    • 4 replies
    • 923 views
    • 1 reply
    • 383 views
    • 1 reply
    • 355 views
    • 1 reply
    • 347 views
    • 0 replies
    • 320 views
    • 0 replies
    • 155 views
  4. Tarkington at Hardin

    • 0 replies
    • 518 views


  • Live & Upcoming Broadcasts

  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
×
×
  • Create New...