Jump to content

Dallas ISD considering filing a grievance over PNG win


bullets13

Recommended Posts

PNG won every statistical category in the game. They held a great team and 2 time defending State Champs to 167 yards. Thats why they won the game. 

Rushing 126 to 106  PNG

Passing 162 to 64 PNG

Total yards 288 to 167 PNG

Turnovers 0 to 1 PNG

Time of possession  29:02 to 18:58 PNG

First Downs 18 to 11 PNG

Sacks 4-2 PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, png409ndns said:

BS. Fort Worth is closer to SOC than Houston is to Port Neches. All the same difference. 

If you were familiar with up there you would know it's a little bit different between Fort Worth and the D and that's putting it mildly.  Should I say mildly @Matthew328 ?? 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, pine curtain said:

well now we know why he was calling at state.

I guess he must have just had a bad game........

You might want to ask Mike Fitch who the head honcho of TASO is.........

I've never met Mr Fitch, I know Bill was at state football this year organizing and managing the officials and is usually the point person for TASO at coaching school...I guess Bill is technically #2

I want to say Bill's crew has been picked to do 5 state title games now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/25/2023 at 8:34 AM, TradenupBH said:

Maybe since all state games are played in Dallas that in return, all officials should be from Houston area. Evens the playing field. Lol

Maybe the crews should be from the San Antonio area. They would be neutral since they very rarely have any teams play for a state title anymore. LOL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Matthew328 said:

Houston officials worked DeSoto-Summer Creek, PNG-SOC and Aledo-Smithson Valley...San Antonio did Duncanville-North Shore

Gunter - Tidehaven and Bellville - Gilmer should have had Houston refs.  It should be across the board for all classifications, as long as the games remain in Dallas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I had my druthers, the UIL would reserve AT&T, NRG and the Alamodome, assign out stadium venues based on which of the three stadiums is closest to equidistant from the two high schools playing the game, and assign ref crews from chapters nowhere near either school.

This would fix a lot of problems. It would take away the built-in homefield advantage for the Metroplex schools. Houston-, Golden Triangle- and Dallas-area schools would play each other in San Antonio. West and East Texas schools would still play each other in Dallas. Some of those small school games would probably be played in Houston.

It would ensure no appearance of bias on the part of the refs. It would likely allow for better scheduling because games could be played simultaneously. (It’s unfair to the smaller schools that they have to play games on Tuesdays and Wednesday nights, in my opinion.)

The problem would be the cost, which I doubt the UIL could afford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pine curtain said:

And POLiTICS were involved in those coaches selections

What politics would make Coach Joseph and Coach Todd to both agree to a Fort Worth crew led by Bill Theodore for their 2022 game? I know Coach Todd pretty well and he doesnt strike me as the kind of guy who plays politics in the least..and I would think the same applies to Coach Joseph if he's like his Dad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Matthew328 said:

What politics would make Coach Joseph and Coach Todd to both agree to a Fort Worth crew led by Bill Theodore for their 2022 game? I know Coach Todd pretty well and he doesnt strike me as the kind of guy who plays politics in the least..and I would think the same applies to Coach Joseph if he's like his Dad

Like you said Bill Theodore is "the head honcho of TASO."

You really do not think that was not a factor? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    hinab
    Newest Member
    hinab
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
    • *** Moved to High School Baseball Forum***
    • You just analogized to a tee the situation going on with the Trump New York trial. And I bet you can't even see the hypocrisy elicited out of your hatred. You once again outed yourself...without any realization of your actions. I'm not sure if Reagan actually set you up to expose your blatant hypocrisy, or if it was just a happy coincidence. You seem to thrive on humiliating yourself. Now get to work on providing that evidence of your emphatic declarations that Trump's economy was horrible. You failed miserably before, I bet you will again.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...