Jump to content

#5 Wimberley vs #6 Bellville


BBfan061

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

Bellville 48 Gilmer 28$

according to CAL Preps

we laugh at computer projections alot and wonder just what algorithm they for projections

This year if I remember correctly it said Bellville v Gilmer for the title.

.

It may have changed… but it was saying Bellville vs PG halfway through district 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, BBfan061 said:

It may have changed… but it was saying Bellville vs PG halfway through district 

My suspicion is that if it were to be BV and Gilmer that Gilmer would have a tough time matching up with BV. I think Wimberly has the most favorable matchup with BV of the remaining teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 89Falcon said:

Duly noted. Come to think of it, you saying my posts are sensationalized is “getting kind of old”.
 

Glad we are free to post as we see fit and ignore if we choose, if not both of us would be in trouble. 

Question, and this is only because I like to help people or even just individuals sort things out... Do you think if you didn't sensationalize or even just generalize things so much then @AggiesAreWe wouldn't post that your "posts are sensationalized" as often?

Now, @AggiesAreWe, do you think if Mr. @89Falcon had commented with "sensationalized" posts about a team that you weren't so close to instead of say Silsbee for instance, that you wouldn't think they were getting old?

I hope we've all learned something today. If we just stop and ask questions, sometimes a clearer truth and resolution can be reached. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Question, and this is only because I like to help people or even just individuals sort things out... Do you think if you didn't sensationalize or even just generalize things so much then @AggiesAreWe wouldn't post that your "posts are sensationalized" as often?

Now, @AggiesAreWe, do you think if Mr. @89Falcon had commented with "sensationalized" posts about a team that you weren't so close to instead of say Silsbee for instance, that you wouldn't think they were getting old?

I hope we've all learned something today. If we just stop and ask questions, sometimes a clearer truth and resolution can be reached. 

 

I have made comments about other posts he has made regarding different teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

Question, and this is only because I like to help people or even just individuals sort things out... Do you think if you didn't sensationalize or even just generalize things so much then @AggiesAreWe wouldn't post that your "posts are sensationalized" as often?

Now, @AggiesAreWe, do you think if Mr. @89Falcon had commented with "sensationalized" posts about a team that you weren't so close to instead of say Silsbee for instance, that you wouldn't think they were getting old?

I hope we've all learned something today. If we just stop and ask questions, sometimes a clearer truth and resolution can be reached. 

 

I'm so glad I read the 2nd page before I got in on the sensationalist comment about WOS. Thanks for the passive therapy session. Hope everyone feels resolved. 

 

Let's go Bellville!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, BB2023 said:

Purely hypothetical question: what are y’all’s thoughts regarding a teams strength of schedule? 

I think in a state this big, it makes it pretty hard to judge how good a team is until you see them in person.  Bellville is a perfect example, obviously.  They started 10-0 last year playing a weak schedule, people were talking about state runs, then they squeaked by WOS and laid an egg against Madisonville in the second round. This year they go 10-0 against an even weaker schedule, then win their first four playoff games by about 800 points against some really good teams.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bullets13 said:

I think in a state this big, it makes it pretty hard to judge how good a team is until you see them in person.  Bellville is a perfect example, obviously.  They started 10-0 last year playing a weak schedule, people were talking about state runs, then they squeaked by WOS and laid an egg against Madisonville in the second round. This year they go 10-0 against an even weaker schedule, then win their first four playoff games by about 800 points against some really good teams.  

Yep, their first four playoff games were about the same caliber as the rest of their schedule. Wimberly may be the first real test. Hopefully they hang on and get it done. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NEWton86
    Newest Member
    NEWton86
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Not yet, anyway. If you can't see that there has been a strong effort to create gender dysphoria amongst young folks AND try to keep it from parents in many instances, you're not paying attention. You may not care about this, but it's ridiculous to ridicule those that do. There is an agenda behind this, no doubt about it, like bullets pointed out earlier, it's just a name change...for now. And it was only very recently that girls were allowed to join the "boy scouts", they have been allowed to join certain other groups that weren't available to girls at the time. It's the frog in the slow boil.
    • Bullard 10  LCM - 4  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...