Jump to content

West Orange-Stark (20) @ Port Neches-Groves (26) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

On 9/10/2023 at 12:10 PM, dj said:

No!! He offered to help!! But, this new regime wants no part of the old way.trying to prove a point that another way can make us better.

 

8 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Which part do u disagree with?

I guess I should get clarification before I respond. Which “regime” is being referred to? The school board? The coaches? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's the new coaches that don't want to have anything to do with the old coaches or tradition of WOS. In my opinion they have a huge chip on their shoulders and want everything their way in though they have a proven and championship level program on place. My question is how long do go down this rabbit hole before we say enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, monknuk68 said:

It's the new coaches that don't want to have anything to do with the old coaches or tradition of WOS. In my opinion they have a huge chip on their shoulders and want everything their way in though they have a proven and championship level program on place. My question is how long do go down this rabbit hole before we say enough?

What makes you think that? I have had direct conversations that say otherwise...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, 3rdone said:

Yes it is true. Our old books would go to LCM. WOS had money to burn due to the chemical plants in the area. We had experimental equipment, embroidered towels with a belt loop...none of that tear a towel and make your own crap. We wore black shoes and lost games and they shelved the shoes and never brought them back. Of course this was during WOS hay day of making money and a thriving economy for Orange. I recently visited Orange and almost didn't recognized the place...really sad.

Hey now we're about to build our 3rd Whataburger. If 3 Whataburgers don't showcase a thriving economy then I don't know what does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SmashMouth said:

What makes you think that? I have had direct conversations that say otherwise...

Many other people on this site have stated that some of the new coaches want no help or advice from the old established coaches. They have an goal to prove that their untested way of coaching is better or at least as good as a proven winning formula.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

What makes you think that? I have had direct conversations that say otherwise...

I've heard many conversations with admins, current coaches, and former coaches... that say he has refused the help that was offered to him. 

This movement will be/IS stronger than any petition, or outlandish demands of a particular race to be hired as the next coach. And I know you know this backlash has nothing to do with his race or his character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ladybug33 said:

Welp, maybe coach T. will put write a whole big ole chapter about him reaching out to current coaches and, if they refused his help. I can't wait until his book is out.

When I talked to him in the spring he said around football season he should be done with it and trying to get it published…hopefully it’s soon I can’t wait!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great game by WOS but you fans living in the past have gotten beyond delusional. How many coaches come in and have the old staff hanging around and telling them how to coach? Also schemes change with new coaches. Players adapt. All the, oh if we were running the 50 front and Coach was here to help we would have beat PN-G by 20+ is getting old. Y'all sound like Jimbo Fisher after the Miami loss. They were clapping, the field logo was slippery, the grass was new, wrong shoes. RC Slocum wasn't there with the old wrecking crew. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, aki1994 said:

Great game by WOS but you fans living in the past have gotten beyond delusional. How many coaches come in and have the old staff hanging around and telling them how to coach? Also schemes change with new coaches. Players adapt. All the, oh if we were running the 50 front and Coach was here to help we would have beat PN-G by 20+ is getting old. Y'all sound like Jimbo Fisher after the Miami loss. They were clapping, the field logo was slippery, the grass was new, wrong shoes. RC Slocum wasn't there with the old wrecking crew. 

What was his record before his in house hire?  Most dang sure know after the programs many years of consistent success would be considering it. 

The best move for the program was not what has been done and has been stated even BEFORE it happened. Everyone knew this was coming. 30+ years of excellence! Keep it going!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long are you guys gonna drag this stuff out? Geez...Coach T ain't there anymore and almost all the old staff is gone.  New head coach and assistant coaches.  They are going to do what they think is best for the program and THERE IS A CHANCE IS MAYBE DIFFERENT THEN WHAT THEY DID IN THE PAST.  Also, they ain't gonna run the 50 defense. BTW all the 50 defense is is a 3-4 that is already shaded to one side.  WOS gets into a 3-4 look sometimes and slat to the famous 50 DEFENSE.  Like I said, the whining is getting old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
    • 🤣🤣🤣  Right on schedule!!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...