Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/12/2025 in all areas
-
So the Bill of Rights isn’t important, and can change anytime because the Founders are dead? Pretty lame argument. The Constitution doesn’t change, and has never changed. Only the interpretations & additions. But, since you say it changes with the times, then you’d have no objections to changing back to original intent of the Amendment authors.4 points
-
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
bullets13 and 3 others reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
Do you think Congress, in 1866 when they created the 14th amendment, planned on the President of the United States opening the border and letting almost 7 million illegals come in? Also, with 3-7 year waits for a hearing, think of all the babies that could be born. This needs to be addressed.4 points -
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
5GallonBucket and 2 others reacted to bullets13 for a topic
what if the law allowed for a situation where a criminal could break into your house and have a baby, and then not only would the baby be allowed to stay and live there in your house, but the mother would be allowed to as well so she could take care of the baby? As the owner of the house you'd even have to allot some of your monthly budget to help provide basic services and food for them. Sound absurd? It does to me as well. @UT alum, same question.3 points -
Oh yeah, my great grandparents on my mother’s side and great great great grandparents on my father’s were legal immigrants to this country and granted citizenship through naturalization. So I was born in the United States to American citizens, therefore under the jurisdiction of the country.3 points
-
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
thetragichippy and one other reacted to bullets13 for a topic
nah, he doesn't like that part. he supports the constitution when it suits him.2 points -
Barbers Hill vs Pflugerville Hendrickson Game 1: 6pm Thursday May 8, Bridgeland HS Game 2: 1pm Saturday May 10, Caldwell Game 3: 30 minutes after Game 2 (if needed)2 points
-
How do you know now? Profile much? You must live in a very small world. My daughter-in-law is a naturalized citizen from Costa Rica. She’s as much a citizen as you or me. She even served in the U.S. Navy. Probably has given more of herself to this country than you. She happens to be very proud to be an American. If you read any of the articles I linked to, you’d have a lot better idea of what’s going on. But hey…carry on…2 points
-
Cardinal Backer
bullets13 reacted to CardinalBacker for a topic
Thanks for asking. I’m opposed to doing away with property taxes for a few reasons- primarily, in regards to “how will we replace this tax revenue?” If you normally pay $3k per year in property taxes, you’d just expect to pick it up elsewhere, through sales tax or an excise (vat) tax. The only problem is that the redistribution of that burden won’t be passed down evenly. Parkdale Mall Will no longer pay property taxes, but WILL pay a higher sales tax on the lightbulbs and toilet paper that they buy. They’re going to pay way less. A guy that owns a dozen rent houses will see his property tax bill shrink dramatically. Will he pass the savings on to his tenants? Of course not. The people renting won’t see any change at all in their cost of living. But the average Joe Homeowner who’s already having trouble making ends meet will surely see an increase in the cost of everything he buys to survive. It’s been proven that increases in sales taxes hurt lower income people worse than wealthy people. A larger percentage of their income will be spent on taxes, while people with multiple properties see their tax liability decrease. Another HUGE problem is that money won’t be collected locally. Your sales tax dollars will be collected by an agency of the state that will then redistribute the funds as they see fit. Good luck getting those hairy-legged women in the Peoples’ Republic of Austin to send anything back our way. How well can rural counties lobby against the Harris, Bexar, Dallas, and Tarrant counties? We’ll all be sucking hind teat, if you know what I mean. The cost of education is high. Right now the average annual spending per student in Texas is almost $10k/year. Assuming you had three kids at home, could you afford to educate them at a cost of $30k per year? I sure couldn’t. Most people who have kids in school simply can’t afford to shoulder the cost of educating them by themselves. That’s how we ended up spreading the cost of their education among all property owners. I’m not saying that property taxes are fair, but it’s the most fair system that we’ve got. And to be frank, the voting public will vote against their own interests when instructed to. I’d be amazed if you didn’t just vote for politicians here in Texas that were in favor of giving tax dollars to rich parents to offset the cost of private education for their spoiled brats. Not necessarily you personally, but Texans as a group just sent their legislators to Austin with a mandate to make vouchers for private school for rich kids a public responsibility, while simultaneously arguing that “taxation is theft.” It’s bananas.1 point -
2025 Astros
baddog reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
It will be very difficult for Houston to trade him due to his contract and being damaged goods. Astros would basically expect nothing in return for him. That's not good business.1 point -
Silsbee Notches First Playoff Series Win Since 2012
AggiesAreWe reacted to noah98 for a topic
Great season, girls and coaches. The future looks bright with 8 starters returning. All 3 pitchers will be back and 3 coming up from Junior High that could contribute.1 point -
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
bullets13 reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
That is one of the best analogies I have read😎1 point -
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
thetragichippy reacted to OlDawg for a topic
Only partially true. You conveniently left out the key part like many. He is a citizen because HE was born here, and his PARENTS were legally subject here, resided permanently here, and were presumed loyal to the U.S. HE was underage. So, his status was carried from his parent/parents.1 point -
I like the way our starting pitching lines up for the next two series. colorado series Monday (5/12) Mahle Tuesday (5/13) Leiter Wednesday (5/14) Corbin houston series Thursday (5/15) deGrom Friday (5/16) Eovaldi Saturday (5/17) Mahle Sunday (5/18) Leiter1 point
-
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
thetragichippy reacted to bullets13 for a topic
So you also support "an AR-15 on every corner", right?1 point -
Silsbee's Joe Sigler to retire...../ Cornelius Brown is new HC
BADSANTA reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
I simply can't see Silsbee promoting Jacob over Ira at this point unless that's Ira wish. Both have interviewed. I can see them promoting Ira to head coach for the next 3-4 years then handing the reigns over to Jacob.1 point -
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
5GallonBucket reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
The constitution gives Congress the power to make laws concerning immigration.....currently, it is illegal to cross the border unless grated that right. So, if you support the constitution, they should not be allowed to cross in the first place.1 point -
2025 Texas Rangers
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to bullets13 for a topic
great chance to win another. the rockies are 7-33 this year. Hopefully build some momentum before hosting Houston for 4 games.1 point -
Barbers Hill vs Angleton Game 1: 6:30pm Thursday May 15 Game 2: 6:30pm Friday May 16 Game 3: noon Saturday May 17 (if needed) All games at Deer Park1 point
-
**Area Round Info**
lionpride08 reacted to Gocats90 for a topic
Yes sir good job lions. Hope to see yall next round.1 point -
Because of the Constitution. The term birthright citizenship is not in the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment says born in the United States AND subject to its jurisdiction. In the Supreme Court case of Elk v. Wilkins they ruled that even though Elk was born in US territory, the fact that he was born on a reservation, he was under the jurisdiction of his tribe. He was therefore not a US citizen just because he was born here. The subject to the jurisdiction is the problem. In US v. Wong Kim Ark the Supreme Court ruled on a person here lawfully. Wong was born on US soil to parents who were Chinese however they had been granted permanent citizenship. Since the US had granted his parents permanent status in this country, they were now under the jurisdiction of the US. As the Fourteenth Amendment states, a person is a citizen at birth if born in the US AND subject to its jurisdiction. As ruled in Elk, being born here did not even make a Native American a US citizen. It was settled enough that the US Congress under their authority in Article I of the Constitution, passed a law giving all Native Americans born in the US citizenship. So it literally took an act of Congress for them to be citizens. Why? Because the Supreme Court had already ruled that they were not citizens merely by being born on US soil. In my first post I said there was about a 98% of birthright citizenship being confirmed by the Supreme Court but more out of tradition. They are going to throw their collective hands up and say, “oh well, regardless of the intent of the Fourteenth Amendment, we don’t want to change tradition”.1 point
-
Stock Market Losses Under Trump
LumRaiderFan reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
Today should be a good day with the China tariffs paused..... Trump said to buy - those who listened is going to make some money today1 point -
The 14th Amendment & Birthright Citizenship
5GallonBucket reacted to baddog for a topic
Your boy Obama deported 3 million, so are we even? You keep trying to nail republicans on an issue while totally overlooking history and democratic policies. Where were the protestors when Obama deported 3 million? Did they receive due process? Of course not. You have no answer for this so I will do it for you……”Yeah right” “Whatever”1 point -
2025 Texas Rangers
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to Ty Cobb for a topic
The RANGERS finally win a series as they take 2 out of 3 from the tigers. Heading home to host the rockies.1 point -
I was attempting to show the lady that you said she was naturalized. I thought it comical that she agreed that she was a citizen. If she is naturalized, then she definitely is a citizen. Thank her for her service. I’ll go back to my stance that our forefathers couldn’t foresee a traitor like Biden opening up our borders to an illegal invasion of this magnitude, and I’ll never sway from that opinion.1 point
-
2025 Astros
AggiesAreWe reacted to baddog for a topic
McCullers received death threats for himself and his family. I don’t care how bad someone plays, they should never get death threats. Lots of sick people in this world.1 point -
Tariffs DO Work - But Liberals Have To Stop CRYING (Proof inside)
Reagan reacted to LumRaiderFan for a topic
[Hidden Content]1 point -
Nederland vs Georgetown Thursday May 15th 5pm Friday May 16th 7pm Saturday May 17th 2pm (If needed) All games at Waller High School1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Silsbee's Joe Sigler to retire...../ Cornelius Brown is new HC
STiger85 reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
They are waiting on Coach Mike Krzyzewski and Coach Roy Williams to fly down for interviews. Then they will be finished.1 point -
Woodville is open
LOUD and Proud reacted to 89Falcon for a topic
Yes, too much activity in the forum. It is much better when no one comments1 point -
My Thoughts on the Decline of Attendance at UIL State Football
Tyler Dixson reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity for a topic
Facts!!!1 point -
My Thoughts on the Decline of Attendance at UIL State Football
WOS95 reacted to gary-us-bonds for a topic
People from Houston will travel and people from Dallas won't. That's why Houston had low attendance numbers.1 point