Jump to content

West Orange Stark vs Hamshire-Fannett


monknuk68

Recommended Posts

On 10/3/2023 at 9:32 AM, YodaQuaterback said:

In light of H-F's recent substantial victory, there exists the plausible scenario wherein they may commence the upcoming contest with an initial period of sluggishness. Under such circumstances, it stands to reason WOS could exploit this potential vulnerability by securing an early advantage, thereby positioning themselves favorably to claim victory in this impending encounter. In my prognostication, I anticipate a closely contested affair, with the margin of victory limited to a solitary score. Specifically, I posit a scenario in which WOS wins 40 to 35, thus affirming the potential for an exhilarating and closely-fought match.

Another “scenario” is “WOS beats the brakes off of HF”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Mr. Thornton Melon said:

I remember Vidor beating French the year they won state. 

I believe Mike Pierce former long time WOS asst. football coach was QB on that '84 Vidor team, before moving on to become an All American defensive back at McNeese.  That '84 Bmt. French team had some solid players & coaches on that state title run where they were double digit underdogs in every playoff game. Steve Shaver-HC, Mark Gilbeaux at QB, Paul Jones at RB, Melvin Turner at TE\DE, Jeff Turner at FB\LB, Willie Williams, Cedric Jones & Keith Wycoff were a tough 3 man WR group to cover. Those were some good times for Bmt. high school Football.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I love my Longhorns after a hard fought Jasper victory, combined with kids being out all week for Rice Festival I think WOS takes this one by 14. Now if HF gets up early different story.. that’s the key… HF has alot more speed then Jasper. Big too just depends on if they are focused 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    hinab
    Newest Member
    hinab
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
    • *** Moved to High School Baseball Forum***
    • You just analogized to a tee the situation going on with the Trump New York trial. And I bet you can't even see the hypocrisy elicited out of your hatred. You once again outed yourself...without any realization of your actions. I'm not sure if Reagan actually set you up to expose your blatant hypocrisy, or if it was just a happy coincidence. You seem to thrive on humiliating yourself. Now get to work on providing that evidence of your emphatic declarations that Trump's economy was horrible. You failed miserably before, I bet you will again.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...