Jump to content

Hamshire Fannett at Lumberton


Recommended Posts

Good 1st game matchup for both teams. Zeno for HF is a legit play maker, can score any time he touches it whatever position he plays. Young QB for HF Bryson? looked good in Nederland scrimmage. Strong arm, accurate & made all the throws. L-Towns offense is a problem for any defense once they get rolling, their size & depth might be too much for HF to deal with for 4 quarters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, KF89 said:

Good 1st game matchup for both teams. Zeno for HF is a legit play maker, can score any time he touches it whatever position he plays. Young QB for HF Bryson? looked good in Nederland scrimmage. Strong arm, accurate & made all the throws. L-Towns offense is a problem for any defense once they get rolling, their size & depth might be too much for HF to deal with for 4 quarters. 

Problem for anyone besides buna. Sorry I had to lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll definitely be another good Week 1 match up. Was watching HF scrimmage at Dayton last week. Zeno looked good as always, Bryson dropped a gorgeous pass over the top of two defenders, right into a WR's arms 30-40 yards down the field. The D-Line could cause some issues for Lumberton, they looked like they had some decent size and were pretty disruptive.

We'll have a live audio stream for the game.

If you can't make the game, tune in over in our Broadcast tab at 7:15 Friday night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2023 at 10:47 AM, Gameday2 said:

Both Lum &HF are big enough schools that they should be able to absorb a couple of different starters being unable to play; Some will have more impact than others; How about HF, haven’t heard much about player status for them. 

HF is not that big we are a small 4a.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/23/2023 at 10:47 AM, Gameday2 said:

Both Lum &HF are big enough schools that they should be able to absorb a couple of different starters being unable to play

Can’t agree with that statement. If you’re missing even 1 of your studs, far less 2, it can be very impactful. I give you Friday night as evidence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ward was missed for sure but blocks have got to still happen. Kersh has been Powell’s go to connection ever since jr high, so that was missed. The receivers Reyes, Breeden,Bourque, and Rhodes are proving that they will haul in a pass in traffic so that is looking good. I think our defense will get stronger. Had some good hits and big plays. As play recognition gets better, will cut down on big plays happening. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • So you are saying a star baseball SHOULD be doing full contact football drills during the baseball season as his Baseball team prepares for the playoffs?
    • Roger.  I misread your comment. Perhaps the other sports will turn the corner sometime soon.
    • I'm going to agree with this. Individual drills would be fine, but a varsity baseball player should not be involved in full pad practices during the baseball season. Especially, if he is a contributing player on a playoff bound baseball team. This is irresponsible and selfish of the AD/HFC.
    • If there's a specific situation that started this thread, I don't know the details.  Nor do I care.  But I do have an opinion about what I'm gathering from some of the comments. My opinion: I do believe that an AD should leave the players of a particular sport to their respective head coach during that season.  The varsity players of that sport anyway.  I believe it's a little different concerning the sub varsity players of that sport.  If an AD/HFC decides to grab some JV baseball players for some offseason football stuff during the athletics period, I don't have AS MUCH of a problem with it.  I would still consider it a common courtesy to discuss with the head coach of that particular sport to consider their thoughts on it. I also believe that ALL athletes should be lifting and running all year.  When in a particular season, I believe that the head coach of that sport should control the reigns on that topic to implement some sport specific lifting/running during their season.  But all athletes should be in the weight room year round. As far as playing multiple sports?  I'm an advocate.  I know that the popular idea is for potentially good/great players in a specific sport to "focus" on that sport.  And I agree.. but focusing on one sport doesn't mean stopping the others.  It just means prioritizing time in a way that extra work is put into that specific sport.  After hours, weekends, holidays/summer, etc..  Just because you plan on making a push into college baseball (for example) doesn't mean you can't work on baseball during other sports seasons.  That's exactly what I did.. and countless others.  Plus, it's important to maybe learn how to be a role player in a sport that you're not the best at.  Because that's coming. That's my opinion.  And I come from an era where kids played multiple sports if they knew it would be helping.  Helping their classmates.. or just contributing to school pride.  I hate knowing that there are schools that could be much more competitive if their kids would just come out.  It's hard for me to understand if I'm being honest. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...