Well, the ones who are upset by this are the same ones who canât define a woman. There was another woman who everybody came down on for hunting. We are a nation of the offended. Â
For what itâs worth, polling after this came out show her with an 81% disapproval rating. Â Only 21% of republicans said sheâd be a good choice for veep, and only 28% of self-identified âvery conservativeâ voters said sheâs a good option. Â Bragging about killing a dog apparently resonates poorly across political affiliations. Â
They donât, and they wonât. Â May not be an issue in South Dakota, but certainly is on the national stage. Â Even my mother in law, who strictly watches OAN and thinks Trump is a great guy whoâs never committed a crime in his life is completely disgusted by this. Â I know about bad dogs, and donât have an issue with what she did, Â and Iâm sure most of us on here agree. Â But as is often this case, itâs not going to be our opinions that decide this election. Â I thought she might be a valuable running mate that could bring in the female vote, but Iâm hoping Trump has the sense to stay away from her now. Â
I like the approach, here it is, if you donât like it donât vote for me, itâs refreshing to see the Ronald Reagan approach.
Not every statement needs to be based on a perceived reaction from folks.
Donât think for a minute democrats didnât have this knowledge, just not the right time to use it, remember Romney and the dog carrier, they knew.
Â
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.