Jump to content

100% of Democrats Vote Against Stopping Men From Infiltrating Women’s Sports!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted

McCarthy celebrates House passage of bill protecting women’s sports, says vote fulfills GOP promise!  The House passed the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act on a 219-203 vote without any Democrat support.  Folks, the devil's take over of the Democratic party is just about complete!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted

Yeah.... this is another area where I think the Dems just get it wrong.  You did all of that "good" work with Title IX and then destroy womens' sports by catering to the cross dressers.  

They claim to be the party of women, but obviously chose the "T's" when it came down to women vs the Alphabet Mafia.  Kinda like claiming to be party that supports minorities, but they really don't have an answer for the Latino population.  If you're black and broke, it's oppression, privilege, systemic racism, 400,000 years of slavery here in America, etc...  If you're brown and broke, they really don't have an answer for you.... other than "you need to support our black brethren."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

This issue is beyond stupid.  I can’t even believe it’s a thing. Change your sex or whatever all you want. But you don’t do it and expect to compete against our daughters.  That’s lunacy and a good way to push swing voters to the right. 

And, you have a Supreme Court Justice that doesn’t know the definition of a woman.  The whole Democrat party and their ideals are stupid.  It is beyond belief how anyone would cast a vote for a Democrat.  There really are a lot of stupid people out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

And, you have a Supreme Court Justice that doesn’t know the definition of a woman.  The whole Democrat party and their ideals are stupid.  It is beyond belief how anyone would cast a vote for a Democrat.  There really are a lot of stupid people out there.

It’s as dumb politically as it is in practicality.  It never ceases to amaze me how truly out of touch with reality these idiots are who govern us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted

I’m all for people doing what they want and being who they want to be, no matter how silly or crazy it seems to me.  But the second that those choices affect other people, whether it be in sports, or little girls having to use the restroom next to grown men, or any other related issue, my support for your “rights” drops to zero.  The idea that the feelings of .5% of the population are more important that the fairness and safety of all women is absolutely absurd.  I’m reminded of a little blurb from Family Guy I saw awhile back.  A bartender walks up to a lady sitting at the bar on her phone and says “excuse me ma’am, no porn at the bar.”  She replies “oh, it’s okay, I’m transgender.”  And the bartender says “oh, I had no idea. Do whatever you want, all the time.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
On 4/20/2023 at 2:47 PM, CardinalBacker said:

Yeah.... this is another area where I think the Dems just get it wrong.  You did all of that "good" work with Title IX and then destroy womens' sports by catering to the cross dressers.  

They claim to be the party of women, but obviously chose the "T's" when it came down to women vs the Alphabet Mafia.  Kinda like claiming to be party that supports minorities, but they really don't have an answer for the Latino population.  If you're black and broke, it's oppression, privilege, systemic racism, 400,000 years of slavery here in America, etc...  If you're brown and broke, they really don't have an answer for you.... other than "you need to support our black brethren."

Dems get it wrong across the board, not just this issue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Dems get it wrong across the board, not just this issue!

Wrong.... they're on the right side of the fact that the ultra rich aren't paying taxes like the rest of us.   If you have your own jet with gold faucets/fixtures, yet contribute NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.   If Jeff Bezos has enough dough to build the largest yacht on earth, yet pays NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.  You can't get republicans to admit this, though.

 

More importantly, Democrats can come together and get legislation passed and create fundamental change.  There's always a Rand Paul, John McCain, etc. waiting to stop any potential legislation that Republicans supposedly want.  Kinda like all we heard for years was "Repeal and Replace," but when the Rs held all of the cards they took a swing at it, failed, then said "well, we tried.... how about more tax breaks for the rich?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Wrong.... they're on the right side of the fact that the ultra rich aren't paying taxes like the rest of us.   If you have your own jet with gold faucets/fixtures, yet contribute NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.   If Jeff Bezos has enough dough to build the largest yacht on earth, yet pays NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.  You can't get republicans to admit this, though.

 

More importantly, Democrats can come together and get legislation passed and create fundamental change.  There's always a Rand Paul, John McCain, etc. waiting to stop any potential legislation that Republicans supposedly want.  Kinda like all we heard for years was "Repeal and Replace," but when the Rs held all of the cards they took a swing at it, failed, then said "well, we tried.... how about more tax breaks for the rich?"

If they’re playing by the legal rules, good for them.  The less money that goes to the government, the better.

By the way, if the big bad rich paid more taxes, it wouldn’t improve yours or anyone else's life one bit, it would simply allow for more government waste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5GallonBucket

5GallonBucket

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

If they’re playing by the legal rules, good for them.  The less money that goes to the government, the better.

By the way, if the big bad rich paid more taxes, it wouldn’t improve yours or anyone else's life one bit, it would simply allow for more government waste.

Cut govt positions.

I see it in all entities that govt touches both state and federal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Wrong.... they're on the right side of the fact that the ultra rich aren't paying taxes like the rest of us.   If you have your own jet with gold faucets/fixtures, yet contribute NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.   If Jeff Bezos has enough dough to build the largest yacht on earth, yet pays NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.  You can't get republicans to admit this, though.

 

More importantly, Democrats can come together and get legislation passed and create fundamental change.  There's always a Rand Paul, John McCain, etc. waiting to stop any potential legislation that Republicans supposedly want.  Kinda like all we heard for years was "Repeal and Replace," but when the Rs held all of the cards they took a swing at it, failed, then said "well, we tried.... how about more tax breaks for the rich?"

You sound like a good Democrat squawking about the tax issue.  Don’t you think the rich Dems take full advantage of the tax system, as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

You sound like a good Democrat squawking about the tax issue.  Don’t you think the rich Dems take full advantage of the tax system, as well.  

I didn't say anything about the political beliefs of the rich people who aren't paying ANY taxes like the rest of us do.

 

This is how you know that we're ALL stupid on both sides of the aisle.  You have poor people on one side voting D because they want more handouts, then you have poor people on the other side fighting so that a select few rich people don't have to pay taxes, in hopes that some of the crumbs might come their way.  

 

Your argument is that it's perfectly okay (not legal.... but okay) that we have a guy with multiple golf resorts, hotels, mansions, and a jet airliner of his very own that pays no personal income taxes?  But you'll turn around and argue about people on welfare getting EIC payments? It's baffling.   We have a progressive tax system where (in theory) people who earn more pay more taxes on the higher portion of their incomes... except the ultra rich pay nothing, and you're cool with that?  Because I'm not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

If they’re playing by the legal rules, good for them.  The less money that goes to the government, the better.

By the way, if the big bad rich paid more taxes, it wouldn’t improve yours or anyone else's life one bit, it would simply allow for more government waste.

The fact that you post this (and I assume believe it), then have a handful of like-minded people "like" your post indicates how badly brainwashed that you all are. 

Patriots back in the late 1700s started a revolution over taxation by the British.  In 2023 you have "Patriots" who are cool with the ultra rich not paying anything while the rest of us do.  That's when you know you're dealing with morons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,951
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • LumRaiderFan
      Columbia University Protest Response

      By LumRaiderFan · Posted

      Or a less lethal option would be to have law enforcement yell improper pronouns at them...they'd scatter like sheep. I still prefer your way, lol.
    • 5GallonBucket
      Columbia University Protest Response

      By 5GallonBucket · Posted

      I ve seen this done in several other countries.  And in those countries it happens very lil because of the severity of the consequences.   I saw a video of other world leaders ask “why does America allow such destructiveness” when all the civil unrest was happening because a criminal/criminals were killed  by not following commands.     we have a great system in place but it’s been compromised and we could still learn from other countries.
    • PlayActionPass
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By PlayActionPass · Posted

      I am out of VOTES, but I will give a BIG AMEN!!!!
    • Eagle11
      Columbia University Protest Response

      By Eagle11 · Posted

      You start opening fire and drop about 10 or 12 of these protesting morons it will break up pretty quick.    This ties in with killing the chicken killing dog.
    • 2wedge
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By 2wedge · Posted

      This is an easy one. We have let grifter unqualified coaches infiltrate our children and convince them that they will be D1 athletes if they only focus on a single sport. We've got kids, with single digit ages, playing their sport year-round to "maximize exposure" despite the fact that most college coaches on the recruiting trail will value a multisport athlete. This translates to the school year and ends up with kids being football, basketball, baseball only kids. Track is pretty much the only one left that keeps kids playing other sports and that's primarily because football coaches demand their football kids be track athletes. I literally talked to a man last night, who just moved to Texas from Oklahoma who was telling me his kid played on two different football teams during the season last year. One for his school, one for his select league. During the week the kid was a RB for his school, and on the weekends, he was a QB for his select team. This would equal 7 days a week of full contact football for a 6th grader......6th grader. Once that ends, rolls straight into 7 on 7 for the spring and back to football in the summer. All this for a kid, who seems to be a good athlete, but probably has a ceiling of D2 at best, if he doesn't burn out before that. Parents are silly and think they can develop their kids into being the next Quinn Ewers, but they completely miss the biggest factor in creating that type of athlete.....genetics. Genetics are undefeated. Always have been, always will be. Play sports because you love to compete then compete in everything you do. Quit giving bullsheet rings to "state champions" every single weekend all over the US and get back to valuing team championships won at the community level to build the continuity when they are young. This is the only way to reestablish the pride once felt by every kid in every town across Texas when they got to put on a uniform with their school colors. Otherwise, we can kiss the magic of high school sports goodbye. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...