Jump to content

Lumberton (23) vs Tyler Chapel Hill (35) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, 2wedge said:

LCM is a cautionary tale for Lumberton to work not to emulate. When LCM lost last year, all of SETX assumed they were back and the train would keep on rolling. Unfortunately, they fell off a cliff this year. Lumberton would be served not to get too high on themselves and enter the offseason with the same hunger they had this offseason when expectations for their success were 0. 

I don’t think lack of hunger or off-season expectations were the issue with LCM. Sometimes, you either have the tools or you don’t. Same goes for Lumberton moving forward. Although, I hope they can keep it up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/26/2022 at 6:18 PM, setxathlete14 said:

Not sure how CH sizes up but lumberton is the only school in the district that didn't have to have any 2 way starters. They're really a 5A team playing down right now.

I keep reading where some of you are predicting Lumberton will move back up to 5A next realignment.  That seems silly to me considering that Lumberton's snapshot # decreased over the last 4 years (1222 down to 1215) while the UIL cutoff to move up to 5A consistently goes up each time.  Maybe you guys know something that I don't but it seems pretty clear that Lumberton will still be 4AD1 at the next realignment.  To have an intelligent discussion about this, someone could pull up the last 5 UIL cutoff #s and compare that trend to the less than 2% average annual growth in enrollment at LHS over that same time period.  Maybe you guys are teaching that new Common Core curriculum math in your district but UIL #s and LHS #s seem pretty basic,  You only have to know how to add, subtract and occasionally divide to figure this stuff out.  Use Excel if it gets too difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AthleticSupporter - Jock said:

I keep reading where some of you are predicting Lumberton will move back up to 5A next realignment.  That seems silly to me considering that Lumberton's snapshot # decreased over the last 4 years (1222 down to 1215) while the UIL cutoff to move up to 5A consistently goes up each time.  Maybe you guys know something that I don't but it seems pretty clear that Lumberton will still be 4AD1 at the next realignment.  To have an intelligent discussion about this, someone could pull up the last 5 UIL cutoff #s and compare that trend to the less than 2% average annual growth in enrollment at LHS over that same time period.  Maybe you guys are teaching that new Common Core curriculum math in your district but UIL #s and LHS #s seem pretty basic,  You only have to know how to add, subtract and occasionally divide to figure this stuff out.  Use Excel if it gets too difficult.

Not really sure where you're getting your numbers from because the last two enrollments have went up. I account for some of the new folks that have moved to Southern Hardin County and I can guarantee you people are moving into the area escaping BISD. Eighth grade enrollment is through the roof. Barring a larger than nominal increase in the bottom 5A number or some chicanery by the Lumberton School District, they'll move up in '24.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

I don’t think lack of hunger or off-season expectations were the issue with LCM. Sometimes, you either have the tools or you don’t. Same goes for Lumberton moving forward. Although, I hope they can keep it up. 

Someone else on the team taking snaps and play calls that actually made sense at the time instead of Morris left, Morris right, and Morris up the middle and you'd be correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Dat Brook said:

Not really sure where you're getting your numbers from because the last two enrollments have went up. I account for some of the new folks that have moved to Southern Hardin County and I can guarantee you people are moving into the area escaping BISD. Eighth grade enrollment is through the roof. Barring a larger than nominal increase in the bottom 5A number or some chicanery by the Lumberton School District, they'll move up in '24.

He's right. 2020 they turned in 1222, 2022 was 1215. It's not a significant drop, I call it being stagnant. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

He's right. 2020 they turned in 1222, 2022 was 1215. It's not a significant drop, I call it being stagnant. 

The 8th grade class will be the largest in Lumberton history that is coming through. So the question is do they count the 8th grade class coming in?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

The 8th grade class will be the largest in Lumberton history that is coming through. So the question is do they count the 8th grade class coming in?  

That 8th grade class will be on campus as Freshmen next snapshot day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

If you type into google 'Lumberton UIL enrollment number 2020' a pdf file pops up from the UIL website. It lists every ISD. Scroll thru and you'll see Lumberton at 1222 for 2020. 

Publicschoolreview.com

The only reason why I used them as a source is who would randomly pull out a number like that? There has to be some data backing it.

Anyways I would be shocked if they were in 4A come 2024.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, BEARCPA said:

I didn't know that was a rule, unless he waved for a fair catch of course.

I spoke to my brother about this call, as he just retired as a high school football official. I described how the ball was well past 10 yards and how the opposing player seemed like he was frozen when our guys jumped on the ball. Ther actually is an interference call for kick offs BUT the ball must still be in the air and in this case the ball was clearly on the ground. Theymade a huge mistake on that call and very possibly turned the game around for CH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, setxathlete14 said:

Am I wrong about lumberton growing fast? Its a great area with alot of developing real-estate thats where i get my prediction from.

You are not wrong about Lumberton growth, great area to live and lots of developing real estate.  I just focus on the #s.  Lumberton's rate of growth has not changed.  Here are the last 4 UIL snapshot #s: 1158 (5A), 1125 (4A), 1222 (4A), 1215 (4A).  UIL cutoff #s to move up to 5A for the same years: 1100, 1160, 1230, 1300.  So, historically, UIL has raised that cutoff # by about 60-70 students every 2 years.  Another way to say it would be that the growth rate of the UIL cutoff # is more than 3 times that of the LHS enrollment growth rate.  But occasionally there are anomalies.  An unusually small senior class exiting while an unusually large 8th grade class entering HS can cause a change in classification.  If the UIL cutoff # only increases by half of what they have done historically, that is still a cutoff of 1330.  Just how big is this 8th grade class?  Do they have 115 more kids than the current senior class?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, AthleticSupporter - Jock said:

You are not wrong about Lumberton growth, great area to live and lots of developing real estate.  I just focus on the #s.  Lumberton's rate of growth has not changed.  Here are the last 4 UIL snapshot #s: 1158 (5A), 1125 (4A), 1222 (4A), 1215 (4A).  UIL cutoff #s to move up to 5A for the same years: 1100, 1160, 1230, 1300.  So, historically, UIL has raised that cutoff # by about 60-70 students every 2 years.  Another way to say it would be that the growth rate of the UIL cutoff # is more than 3 times that of the LHS enrollment growth rate.  But occasionally there are anomalies.  An unusually small senior class exiting while an unusually large 8th grade class entering HS can cause a change in classification.  If the UIL cutoff # only increases by half of what they have done historically, that is still a cutoff of 1330.  Just how big is this 8th grade class?  Do they have 115 more kids than the current senior class?

Also. High flying success leads to transfers from other schools on top of the normal growth. And being from the area lumbertons growth "seems" much higher than most other places around in my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/29/2022 at 8:36 AM, AthleticSupporter - Jock said:

You are not wrong about Lumberton growth, great area to live and lots of developing real estate.  I just focus on the #s.  Lumberton's rate of growth has not changed.  Here are the last 4 UIL snapshot #s: 1158 (5A), 1125 (4A), 1222 (4A), 1215 (4A).  UIL cutoff #s to move up to 5A for the same years: 1100, 1160, 1230, 1300.  So, historically, UIL has raised that cutoff # by about 60-70 students every 2 years.  Another way to say it would be that the growth rate of the UIL cutoff # is more than 3 times that of the LHS enrollment growth rate.  But occasionally there are anomalies.  An unusually small senior class exiting while an unusually large 8th grade class entering HS can cause a change in classification.  If the UIL cutoff # only increases by half of what they have done historically, that is still a cutoff of 1330.  Just how big is this 8th grade class?  Do they have 115 more kids than the current senior class?

This is the hidden content, please

 

Where's my numbers guy here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,951
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Or a less lethal option would be to have law enforcement yell improper pronouns at them...they'd scatter like sheep. I still prefer your way, lol.
    • I ve seen this done in several other countries.  And in those countries it happens very lil because of the severity of the consequences.   I saw a video of other world leaders ask “why does America allow such destructiveness” when all the civil unrest was happening because a criminal/criminals were killed  by not following commands.     we have a great system in place but it’s been compromised and we could still learn from other countries.
    • I am out of VOTES, but I will give a BIG AMEN!!!!
    • You start opening fire and drop about 10 or 12 of these protesting morons it will break up pretty quick.    This ties in with killing the chicken killing dog.
    • This is an easy one. We have let grifter unqualified coaches infiltrate our children and convince them that they will be D1 athletes if they only focus on a single sport. We've got kids, with single digit ages, playing their sport year-round to "maximize exposure" despite the fact that most college coaches on the recruiting trail will value a multisport athlete. This translates to the school year and ends up with kids being football, basketball, baseball only kids. Track is pretty much the only one left that keeps kids playing other sports and that's primarily because football coaches demand their football kids be track athletes. I literally talked to a man last night, who just moved to Texas from Oklahoma who was telling me his kid played on two different football teams during the season last year. One for his school, one for his select league. During the week the kid was a RB for his school, and on the weekends, he was a QB for his select team. This would equal 7 days a week of full contact football for a 6th grader......6th grader. Once that ends, rolls straight into 7 on 7 for the spring and back to football in the summer. All this for a kid, who seems to be a good athlete, but probably has a ceiling of D2 at best, if he doesn't burn out before that. Parents are silly and think they can develop their kids into being the next Quinn Ewers, but they completely miss the biggest factor in creating that type of athlete.....genetics. Genetics are undefeated. Always have been, always will be. Play sports because you love to compete then compete in everything you do. Quit giving bullsheet rings to "state champions" every single weekend all over the US and get back to valuing team championships won at the community level to build the continuity when they are young. This is the only way to reestablish the pride once felt by every kid in every town across Texas when they got to put on a uniform with their school colors. Otherwise, we can kiss the magic of high school sports goodbye. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...