Jump to content

I'M IN DISBELIEF


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
On 12/5/2022 at 8:48 AM, Raider24 said:

And Lumberton just surpassed Vidor this year. (Lol)

Vidor increased from a .3517 to a .3543

Lumberton increased from a .3488 to a .3601

Baby steps!!

 

 

The fact that Lumberton hired a good coach proves they want to win as a community. Vidors community is  complacent and content with losing. Both are trending in opposite directions

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Thornton Melon said:

 

The fact that Lumberton hired a good coach proves they want to win as a community. Vidors community is  complacent and content with losing. Both are trending in opposite directions

 

 

 

 

So, Do Vidor folks seek "bad coaches"? Do they screen the good ones out during the interview? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Mr. Thornton Melon said:

 

The fact that Lumberton hired a good coach proves they want to win as a community. Vidors community is  complacent and content with losing. Both are trending in opposite directions

 

 

 

 

To be honest, Lumberton hired a new head football coach because the old one left. I don’t think they were trying to make improvements. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Mr. Thornton Melon said:

No , they are just content with sub .500 coaching. its a culture

Understood. Do the coaches in Vidor just not know as much as the fans? or do they intentionally lose? I have seen scenarios where the fans are the true experts of the community while the coaches who see the players in practice everyday and during workouts for the entire year generally do not know much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/17/2022 at 7:57 PM, 89Falcon said:

Understood. Do the coaches in Vidor just not know as much as the fans? or do they intentionally lose? I have seen scenarios where the fans are the true experts of the community while the coaches who see the players in practice everyday and during workouts for the entire year generally do not know much. 

They know who needs to see playing time to keep their job for 23 years of losing. They know all they need to know imho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/19/2022 at 12:33 PM, Mr. Thornton Melon said:

They know who needs to see playing time to keep their job for 23 years of losing. They know all they need to know imho

Please. Like any coach would choose job security at a place that continually loses (according to you), rather than win. Your clown nose is showing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, purpleeagle said:

Winning coaches are coaches who follow the instructions given here by the setx sports experts.     
expert= a person who can put his mouth to a mule’s mouth and can blow the bits out his....you know what. 

And don't forget: they have 7 years to win a state championship. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...