Jump to content

Impeachment

BS Wildcats

By BS Wildcats
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Chester86
Chester86

To tell you the truth, I don’t really care what they say.  Having all the answers and all the moral high-ground must be exhausting.  Me personally, I struggle to be a good husband, dad, employee and j

SmashMouth
SmashMouth

Look. I’m not a Trump sheep. You’re dead wrong on my assessment. You can’t tell me what he said to incite the violence that came about. I don’t agree because I’m a realist. I don’t have a stick up my

Hagar
Hagar

While the Dems hatred of Trump, his supporters, and America, was spouted continuously for 4 years, many including violence against the above, at the Capital and in the MSM, only silence.   Even the Sa

LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

Literally... an election is like a beauty contest.  And you guys are upset that the contestant who gained 40 pounds, shaved her head, refused to wear makeup and whose talent was playing a song by armpit-farting somehow didn't win. 

She must have been cheated.

Nope, I can't speak for others but I'm upset because I have paid attention to the other contestant for decades and I see what's coming...he's even showed it to me once before.

Trump isn't the problem, our flakey low information voters are that choose smooth over policy.

You voted for Trump twice AFTER you have watched him for years going after folks like O'Donnell and now you can't stomach his personality...lol.

He hasn't changed, you must have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Nope, I can't speak for others but I'm upset because I have paid attention to the other contestant for decades and I see what's coming...he's even showed it to me once before.

Trump isn't the problem, our flakey low information voters are that choose smooth over policy.

You voted for Trump twice AFTER you have watched him for years going after folks like O'Donnell and now you can't stomach his personality...lol.

He hasn't changed, you must have.

Exactly

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Nope, I can't speak for others but I'm upset because I have paid attention to the other contestant for decades and I see what's coming...he's even showed it to me once before.

Trump isn't the problem, our flakey low information voters are that choose smooth over policy.

You voted for Trump twice AFTER you have watched him for years going after folks like O'Donnell and now you can't stomach his personality...lol.

He hasn't changed, you must have.

No, he was bad candidate from the start.  The very first time we saw him on the debate stage he went after Rosie O'Donnell and Megyn Kelly in what was just a small glimpse into how he treated everybody... up to and including Mike Pence last Wednesday.  Trump is a rotten person.  And maybe that's the kind of person you look up to and aspire to be... who knows?

I think "flakey" would better describe people who claim to Christian yet vote for someone who exhibits none of Christ's attributes, even going as far as claiming that he's God's chosen one to lead us.  THAT is ironic.   I didn't like him before, I didn't like him as president, and I don't like him today.  I voted against him in the 2016 primary and would have voted against him if anybody was willing to break tradition and run against him in this cycle.  

I think that YOU are the one with flexible morals.  "I would never behave like that myself, but I'm not going to hold Trump accountable because he's so great on the economy."  Well, guess what? Now we're all screwed because most people weren't so willing to entertain his childishness. 

If Republicans don't recognize that repugnant behavior leads directly to lost elections, they'll just find some other jerk who has no business in politics to be our next candidate. And we'll get smoked down again.  I don't have a problem with people voting for Trump. I did twice.  My problem is with people who refuse to accept that the behavior that YOU overlook is what led to his eventual defeat, and his behavior since the election is just proof positive that the man lacks character and is a bigger threat to our democracy than anyone else in history because he can't recognize the fact that he was beaten.  Probably because he, like you, believe that his fecal matter has no odor. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, baddog said:

Totally disagree. Rude and crude is what people liked about Trump. The election was rigged and even the one’s who say it wasn’t, know better. They simply like to argue and are happy that their guy will be in charge. Stilll haven’t found a lefty who can tell me what it is about Biden’s policies that attract them.

He’s not trump. It’s that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, baddog said:

My brain is bigger than a pea, but if it makes you stand a little taller in the saddle to say things like that, have at it. 
So now you are a lefty?

Name calling is a favorite of the Left.  Now that CB has joined with them, at least in Trump hating, it’s his new, go to response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

No, he was bad candidate from the start.  The very first time we saw him on the debate stage he went after Rosie O'Donnell and Megyn Kelly in what was just a small glimpse into how he treated everybody... up to and including Mike Pence last Wednesday.  Trump is a rotten person.  And maybe that's the kind of person you look up to and aspire to be... who knows?

I think "flakey" would better describe people who claim to Christian yet vote for someone who exhibits none of Christ's attributes, even going as far as claiming that he's God's chosen one to lead us.  THAT is ironic.   I didn't like him before, I didn't like him as president, and I don't like him today.  I voted against him in the 2016 primary and would have voted against him if anybody was willing to break tradition and run against him in this cycle.  

I think that YOU are the one with flexible morals.  "I would never behave like that myself, but I'm not going to hold Trump accountable because he's so great on the economy."  Well, guess what? Now we're all screwed because most people weren't so willing to entertain his childishness. 

If Republicans don't recognize that repugnant behavior leads directly to lost elections, they'll just find some other jerk who has no business in politics to be our next candidate. And we'll get smoked down again.  I don't have a problem with people voting for Trump. I did twice.  My problem is with people who refuse to accept that the behavior that YOU overlook is what led to his eventual defeat, and his behavior since the election is just proof positive that the man lacks character and is a bigger threat to our democracy than anyone else in history because he can't recognize the fact that he was beaten.  Probably because he, like you, believe that his fecal matter has no odor. 

 

So I guess it would be more moral to vote for the head of the party that approves of late term abortion?

I would say that is repugnant behavior and is not going to get my vote, EVER.

Add to that the same party sucks on the economy and the military, like I said, no brainer.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Are you serious? Name calling is definitely not a "left" thing. Both sides are pretty good at it.

 

 

 

Guess it depends where you post.  I have a Liberal friend on FB who has a big following.  Many times I’ve been called names that would get them banned on this Forum.   

But I expect that from Left Wing Loons 😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
Just now, Hagar said:

Guess it depends where you post.  I have a Liberal friend on FB who has a big following.  Many times I’ve been called names that would get them banned on this Forum.   

But I expect that from Left Wing Loons 😂😂😂

I don't have a problem with calling each other names.  But we should direct our insults at one another.  It's just not right to call out an entire group of people Dims, Libtards, Trumpkins, or whatever, just because they vote or believe differently isn't right.  But by all means... fire away.   I've got thick skin. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 89Falcon
      QB Controversy Brewing in Crosby

      By 89Falcon · Posted

      "Baytown Lee for a qb"? What does "for a qb" mean?
    • tvc184
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      I can fire 5-6 rounds with a semi auto AR per second. That would empty a 30 round magazine in about 6 seconds. With an approximately (slow) 3 seconds to reload, that is about 180 rounds per minute…. with an over the counter semiautomatic rifle. According to Wikipedia the shooting last for 10 minutes. That is time to fire almost 2,000 in semiautomatic.  Would a true bump stock ban have prevented Vegas?  Would a lawful suppressor (with a $200 tax stamp) have done more selective damage before people started knowing what was happening? Remember that is a legal item.  With a semiautomatic rifle the Miami nightclub shooter killed 49 victims as opposed to 60 in Vegas. I guess 49 is  more acceptable than 60…..
    • navydawg31
      QB Controversy Brewing in Crosby

      By navydawg31 · Posted

      Baytown Lee for a qb I heard… 
    • tvc184
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Shall not be infringed was not even an issue in this case.  The Supreme Court allowed and in fact didn’t even debate the ban on machine guns as being lawful.   The Supreme Court only looked at the law passed by Congress, accepted it as law and looked to see if bump stocks fit the legal definition as passed by Congress and signed by the president.  The easy answer was no, it did not and the ATF was making up their own definition which is unconstitutional.  In another comment you stated that bump stocks serve “no valuable purpose”. I agree but do we throw out the Constitution? We don’t need neo nazis  or klan members rhetoric either but are willing to pick and choose who gets free speech? I support the Supreme Court decision on an item that I don’t want even if you gave me one. I support it because it follows statutory law and the Constitution.  Do you suggest that the Supreme Court ignore the Constitution for political or dislike purposes? 
    • CardinalBacker
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      How would cracking down on crime prevented have what happened in Vegas?   The law of the land is no automatic weapons. If you get caught with a switch on your Glock, it’s a problem.  But you can legally modify your AR to get the same results? It’s a loophole that shouldn’t be there legally, and gun owners should boycott.    I love my AR. I believe everybody should get one. But there’s a big difference between a 30 round mag that’s fired semi-automatically, with at least the possibility of aiming at particular targets…. And a bump stop equipped AR that quite simply can’t be aimed. When the left argues that an AR serves no purpose, I disagree. But when some 2A nut is arguing that their fully automatic AR (by why of a bumpstock which renders the weapon useless in regards to accurate fire) is legal, I have to disagree, too.   

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...