All Activity

Have for decades. No change here. Why do you think I want limited government? Every time I hear someone say they want the government to do something, I cringe. Remember Reagan’s Nine Scariest Words.

Are you just now disgusted with our government?

We aren't voting our way out of this, y'all. Plan accordingly.

7:00 pm

Well said. The Epstein files have become the biggest black eye for this administration. There are very few issues that unite Americans across politics, religion, and income levels. Protecting kids is one of them. The last three administrations failed to address it. This was an opportunity to finally confront it head on. The “attack, deny, never apologize” playbook doesn’t work when children are involved. Yes, there’s a lot to celebrate: • Murder down 20% • Border more secure • America projecting strength • Markets performing well But none of that matters to parents if kids aren’t protected. It’s also true many on the left are more focused on taking down Trump than protecting children, otherwise this would’ve been a priority years ago. Still, this has been badly mishandled. When it comes to kids, transparency and accountability aren’t optional. Major fumble. No other way to say it. Patrick Bet-David

Was it clearly self defense? I thought from the outset that it would be an almost impossible case to prove but if it was so clear, why was he even charged? The law was certainly on the side of the guy charged.

Gary Johnson got 4.5 million votes (3.3%) in 2016, even though he wasn't given security information or even a chance to debate. He wasn't perfect by any means, and I didn't agree with some of the Libertarian Party platform at the time. I still don't. But, I voted for him because I felt he was a better fit for my personal priorities than Clinton (I was an ABC--Anyone But Clinton--voter because of the Benghazi similarity) or Trump. Of course, I also supported Ron Paul and Ross Perot. I had high hopes for Mitt Romney. He was caught on a hot mike telling the truth, and got burned. He still--IMHO--would have been an excellent POTUS. The current primary system is giving us horrible candidates.

Yep, I have a Truth Social account and Trump is getting hammered on the way the Epstein situation was handled by Pam Bondi. His base is not happy and I am afraid he just made himself a lame duck after the midterms. But like I said before he brought all this on himself. It looks like I may just join you on not voting myself. Like I said I think our government is broken beyond repair.

I can't say I blame you. I spent many years doing many things for this government of ours. It left me hanging out on my own on more than one occasion. I chose not to vote. You bringing up Benghazi hit close to home for me for a somewhat similar situation in the 80's. There was plenty of denial then as well. Now, I champion personal liberty and fiscal sanity. I'm not receiving either, and neither is anyone else. Regardless of Party. But, I can still hope. Maybe, there's still a chance we can get our government back to what was intended.

It’s obvious the DOJ is suppressing truthful information and not investigating powerful elites from what I’ve seen over the years. Our government is broken. I’ll just leave it at that. Pretty disgusted at this point. The judiciary hearing the other day was a dumpster fire with Pam Bondi. What a embarrassment.

I'm comparing campaign promises. Can the redaction be proven to be a willful crime? I'm not disagreeing with your anger, nor am I condoning the behavior.

More than three million pages from the Epstein files are now public. Cannibalism. Rape. Murder. Pedophilia. They investigated and raided a literal squirrel before a single person on the Epstein client list.

Offense was taken, they literally redacted a co conspirator to Epstein which is against the law that Trump signed into law. Thats just what he found in the little research of a hour or two looking at the millions of unredacted files. You’re comparing exposing UFO information to information on powerful people Child Sex Trafficking kids? Pretty disappointed in your verbiage Dawg. Have you even looked at any of the documents? My vote was predicated on ACCOUNTABILITY! Russia Hoax , J6 , Covid BS, Epstein Perpetrators, DOGE FINDINGS, 2020 ELECTION FRAUD, etc. At this point ZERO ARREST OF ANYONE INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE AND MORE! Pretty Sad.

This video speaks volumes.

It’s a shame you have to explain that, but no surprise.

Sorry. I don’t see any EVIDENCE OF PEDOPHILIA in Massie’s questioning here… Ineptness. Sure. Cover-up? Not proven yet. Pretty high bar to convict someone for this crime, and most of what I’ve seen and read involves some doubt. This isn’t a civil case. There can be NO REASONABLE DOUBT. Seems to me this is more of a shaming to hope people are ostracized by their peers and the public type situation until/unless I see a lot more. By the time this is all said and done, any criminal case that could have been prosecuted will be corrupted by the coverage. I’m a little surprised someone as intelligent as you appear would partially condition your vote on the campaign promise of the release of information that’s almost two decades old when so much else was at stake. It’s almost like voting for Trump because he promised to release info on UFO’s. No offense meant.

Let’s see…. Pam Bondi February 2025: "The files are on my desk" July 2025: "There are no files, everything's already been released" October 2025: "Oops we just found 5 million files" Watch this little video clip. Here’s one of a few names he found in just 2 hours of looking at the unredacted files.

This info was reported by David Khait not Lara Logan.

You’ve pretty well demonstrated that you don’t know much about election laws. Georgia law may allow homeless people to use shelter addresses for the purpose of registering to vote. My point is, no one knows except people familiar with Georgia laws. Why do you give this kind of tripe air?

The same Lara Logan who got fired from CBS for using an inaccurate source? Now her main platform is X? Real reliable.

Illegally registered? An empty lot by itself means nothing.

I can understand someone saying the Feds shouldn't be requiring anything to be able to vote. I can understand them saying it should be left up to each State. That--to me--is a valid argument. The argument of requiring an ID to vote is a hardship has been disproven over and over through the years via voter turnout. The Parties have modified their voter turnout operations to compensate. They educate their voters and make sure they have what they need to vote.

@UT alum

It’s absolutely ridiculous, anyone with any sense knows exactly why democrats push back on ID.

WOW! Real difficult.! LOL! Are the Democrats, and some here, racist for saying that blacks do not have the intestinal fortitude and intelligence to know what to do if an ID is required to vote? BTW, 71% of blacks favor voter ID.