Jump to content

Dumbest broadcaster comment ever!


Recommended Posts

You do know where the announcers are from don't you. And as a Buckeye supporter I admit they go WAY overboard ALL the time. But, they are former players, they do the job for free, and they love their home team as much as any of you love theirs. And when they play the games back, I know they do sometimes say "why did I say that". They will tell you themselves they are straight up homers and if you don't like it don't listen to them. 

And p.s..... I ain't one of them 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, lostaussie said:

You do know where the announcers are from don't you. And as a Buckeye supporter I admit they go WAY overboard ALL the time. But, they are former players, they do the job for free, and they love their home team as much as any of you love theirs. And when they play the games back, I know they do sometimes say "why did I say that". They will tell you themselves they are straight up homers and if you don't like it don't listen to them. 

And p.s..... I ain't one of them 🤣

oh it is obvious who they support and there is nothing wrong with being a homer at all.  doesn't change my opinion on the "masterful " statement though.  lol. they literally put those boys  chance to advance at that time in jeopardy. fortunately the young man made a helluva play to cause fumble.

Edited by Dirty_but_Dazzling
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

I just watched the end of Carthage vs Gilmer on you tube(Game 14 2023 Gilmer vs carthage)Carthage.

Just so you can get understanding of what is taking place start about at the 3 hour mark. Then at 3:37:33 you will hear what I am talking about.

WOW!

You must have never listened to Dana Melancon (ex Channel 6 weather guy) covering a football game on Southeast Texas Express. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

know what? I have to get my buddy @Reagan on this.

I have to agree with you.  I know it was home cooking as broadcasters.  So you have take that into consideration.  Gilmer was on the verge of losing when the fumble happens.  So masterful?  I think not.  The master(s) was on the other side of the field.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Reagan said:

I have to agree with you.  I know it was home cooking as broadcasters.  So you have take that into consideration.  Gilmer was on the verge of losing when the fumble happens.  So masterful?  I think not.  The master(s) was on the other side of the field.  

Sure was........and he lost

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Reagan said:

I have to agree with you.  I know it was home cooking as broadcasters.  So you have take that into consideration.  Gilmer was on the verge of losing when the fumble happens.  So masterful?  I think not.  The master(s) was on the other side of the field.  

The master lost though. At that moment, I'd rather be the guy on the winning side at that moment. And if Gilmer was that close that one fumble made a difference in the game plan by Surratt, I would have to give some credit to Gilmer's coach(es) too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Just a reminder... we don't allow bashing of any students here. And fwiw, many of us think they're doing a outstanding job for a first year program.

wasn't bashing the students. they do a great job on the live stream.  

was talking about the radio BROADCAST.

just a reminder YOU should NOT assume things.

Heck I would take the PN-g kids over our local TV sports people right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NEWton86
    Newest Member
    NEWton86
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This series will be streamed on Texanlive! Let’s go Eagles
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   I wish the Ohio AG much success...from the article: Ohio’s Republican Attorney General is pushing back against critics after warning that anti-Israel protesters wearing masks are facing potential prison time due to a little known state law. "The First Amendment protects you and saying whatever it is you have to say. Even hateful things are protected by the First Amendment," Ohio AG Dave Yost told Fox News Digital this week. "The First Amendment, though, was always designed to be a shield against the government. It's not a sword against your fellow students and they have rights too. Your First Amendment rights are limited by their right to be able to go to school, use the library, get the value of their education and the tuition that they paid for." In a letter sent on Monday, Yost warned university presidents of a historic state law that could mean masked anti-Israel demonstrators on college campuses could face felony charges.  "The law is an old law," Yost told Fox News Digital. "It goes back to the 20th century, and it was originally designed to make sure that people like Ku Klux Klan were held accountable, that, of course, the reason that the Ku Klux Klan wore hoods and masks over their faces is so that they couldn't be identified because they were committing crimes. So the General Assembly in Ohio said, okay, you can wear a mask, you can wear a hood, that's fine. But if you commit a crime with two or more other people, while you are masking yourself, we're going to see that as a heightened kind of crime, a worse kind of thing, because you're consciously doing this and trying to hide your identity because you know you're doing something wrong."
    • You keep pointing at the fact that Biden got so many votes as proof of cheating, when it’s actually proof of something else… Trump motivates people to get off of the couch, register, and vote for ANYBODY BUT TRUMP.  And instead of looking in the mirror and recognizing that the problem is you (the person who nominates a candidate that most people HATE) you blame the people who vote against him.    Haley pulled down 22% of the votes in the most recent Republican  primary. Those votes were cast AFTER she’d already dropped out of the race.    Trump is going to lose the fourth consecutive election cycle since he beat the even more unlikable Hillary in  2016. The Dems learned from their mistake (nominating a despised candidate in ‘16). The Rs keep nominating the same guy that most people hate and expecting different results.    Dems roll in November. 
    • Not yet, anyway. If you can't see that there has been a strong effort to create gender dysphoria amongst young folks AND try to keep it from parents in many instances, you're not paying attention. You may not care about this, but it's ridiculous to ridicule those that do. There is an agenda behind this, no doubt about it, like bullets pointed out earlier, it's just a name change...for now. And it was only very recently that girls were allowed to join the "boy scouts", they have been allowed to join certain other groups that weren't available to girls at the time. It's the frog in the slow boil.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...