Jump to content

LCM at Lumberton


BattlinBear02

Recommended Posts

While the Bears have had a different season, up until now, than last season, they can still very much win this game.  One must look at the games they lost.  Sure WOS is a shell of itself now, but was very much on point early on.  Kincaid is a whole different beast in and of itself.  Don’t believe me.  Do some research.  And VIDOR…..they play everyone me tough.  That’s just their style.  
Our Battlin Bears have all the weapons to handle Lumberton.  They just have to play solid ball.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, setxathlete14 said:

FWIW. Lcm has had lumbertons number most years Hopefully this trend continues.

That’s true, and I give it a little credence, but this year’s Raiders team is better than those in the past… better than last year even. On that note, I’m taking our boys from L Town in a close one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I foresee a fantastic friday night outing for both teams with the one holding the ball last coming out on top.

No doubt you will see lots of a different looks from the Bears offensively. Winning this game would put Little Cypress in a much better playoff spot so I can definitely see Peevey pulling out all the stops. They've had their ups and downs this year but persevering through trials can have its benefits.

This will be one of the better tests for Lumberton this year and will only make them better. The key for them defensively will be if their linebackers can hold back Morris. Offensively they'll need to establish the run early to keep the ball out away from the Bear's potent offense.

I could definitely see their current run coming to an end and the Bears winning in a close one.

Here's to an injury free game!

Go Bears!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...