Jump to content

Texan live slacking on local broadcasts!


setxathlete14

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Hagar said:

I agree.  This year they’ve put the Triangle on the back burner.  You’d thought LCM would get some air time.  And PNG VS WOS, I don’t think they had that one.  Not happy with them so far.

I don't think its Texan Live, I think its the local school districts.  I could be and may very well be wrong but I believe its up to the school districts to decide if they want Texan Live to broadcast their game/s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, setxathlete14 said:

How do they pick their selections? I haven't seen a local game in 2 weeks.

It's all about what school districts are contracted to TL. I only know of 7-8 schools locally that have contracts with them.

This weeks lineup that has our coverage area teams:

Baytown Sterling at Kingwood Park

Crosby at Barbers Hill

New Caney Porter at PA Memorial

Navasota at Huffman

Hamshire-Fannett at Splendora

Liberty at East Chambers

Silsbee at Brazosport

 

Last weeks lineup:

Galena Park at Splendora

Silsbee at Nederland

Kingwood Park at New Caney Porter

Humble at Spring Dekaney

Las Vegas Liberty at Atascocita

Spring Westfield at North Shore

Baytown Lee at Crosby

CE King at Pearland

 

Week before that:

Huffman at Silsbee

Hamshire-Fannett at East Chambers

Atascocita at Katy

Clear Falls at Summer Creek

New Caney vs. New Caney Porter

Houston Waltrip at Dayton

Montgomery at Barbers Hill

PN-G at Beaumont United

Klein Forest at Humble

FB Marshall at Crosby

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a friend who is in the know on these types of things, and he has told me it's pretty expensive for these districts to contract with Texan Live. Especially when most schools are now supporting AV departments who are capable of streaming live on YouTube for much less. Anahuac does this on their channel "Anahuac Sports Live", and the video and audio quality is significantly better than what you sometimes get on Texan Live.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 2wedge said:

I have a friend who is in the know on these types of things, and he has told me it's pretty expensive for these districts to contract with Texan Live. Especially when most schools are now supporting AV departments who are capable of streaming live on YouTube for much less. Anahuac does this on their channel "Anahuac Sports Live", and the video and audio quality is significantly better than what you sometimes get on Texan Live.  

Your friend is wrong. TL buys the video rights from the schools, not the other way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hagar said:

I agree.  This year they’ve put the Triangle on the back burner.  You’d thought LCM would get some air time.  And PNG VS WOS, I don’t think they had that one.  Not happy with them so far.

I feel the same. And we both know dave Campbell's spends time with peevy in interviews.. might as well cancel subscription until playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hagar said:

I agree.  This year they’ve put the Triangle on the back burner.  You’d thought LCM would get some air time.  And PNG VS WOS, I don’t think they had that one.  Not happy with them so far.

From my understanding no Orange County school has a contract with TL.

As for the PN-G/WO-S game, I believe the lack of facility (press box under construction) was why that game was not on TL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 2wedge said:

Well heck. You'd think every school in the state would take advantage of a deal like that. 

Texan Live isn't big enough to buy that many. Don't forget, they pay UIL for all the playoff games.

Some schools turn down TL because they have their own video production. TL also doesn't solicit every local school. It's about viewership and potential sponsorship for those broadcasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those of you in the know.....could a school, especially if said school is the home team have the right to bar a live video feed of a game?  

Example to me is Anahuac.  May wish to go see them play, but if I can watch it on my phone, well.....decision to be made.  Could another school have the right to block it in order to increase attendance?  

I know some sports management professors and they could "nerd out" discussing an issue like this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, myrecordwashorrible said:

For those of you in the know.....could a school, especially if said school is the home team have the right to bar a live video feed of a game?  

Example to me is Anahuac.  May wish to go see them play, but if I can watch it on my phone, well.....decision to be made.  Could another school have the right to block it in order to increase attendance?  

I know some sports management professors and they could "nerd out" discussing an issue like this.  

According to UIL, a broadcast entity has to have permission from both schools to broadcast that game.

If a school has sold their video broadcast rights to an outside entity, that entity reserves the right to allow or disallow another video broadcast at that home school's stadium. Sometimes it's mainly about having enough space in a press box for two video broadcasts. Other times it's about $$$. If one entity has the rights and they charge to watch their broadcast, it's highly unlikely that they would allow a free video broadcast to do that same game at the home stadium.

In Anahuac's case (and others similar) who have their own video production, they can deny another schools video broadcast at Anahuac's home stadium. They have the video rights. Just remember, if a school denies another school broadcast access, expect the same to be done to you when you go to their stadium. This is only for regular season games. All playoff games are under Texan Live video rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

From my understanding no Orange County school has a contract with TL.

As for the PN-G/WO-S game, I believe the lack of facility (press box under construction) was why that game was not on TL.

They did have Silsbee vs Vidor the first week.  I can understand why they haven’t shown Vidor again.  😂😂😂👽👽😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NEWton86
    Newest Member
    NEWton86
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   I wish the Ohio AG much success...from the article: Ohio’s Republican Attorney General is pushing back against critics after warning that anti-Israel protesters wearing masks are facing potential prison time due to a little known state law. "The First Amendment protects you and saying whatever it is you have to say. Even hateful things are protected by the First Amendment," Ohio AG Dave Yost told Fox News Digital this week. "The First Amendment, though, was always designed to be a shield against the government. It's not a sword against your fellow students and they have rights too. Your First Amendment rights are limited by their right to be able to go to school, use the library, get the value of their education and the tuition that they paid for." In a letter sent on Monday, Yost warned university presidents of a historic state law that could mean masked anti-Israel demonstrators on college campuses could face felony charges.  "The law is an old law," Yost told Fox News Digital. "It goes back to the 20th century, and it was originally designed to make sure that people like Ku Klux Klan were held accountable, that, of course, the reason that the Ku Klux Klan wore hoods and masks over their faces is so that they couldn't be identified because they were committing crimes. So the General Assembly in Ohio said, okay, you can wear a mask, you can wear a hood, that's fine. But if you commit a crime with two or more other people, while you are masking yourself, we're going to see that as a heightened kind of crime, a worse kind of thing, because you're consciously doing this and trying to hide your identity because you know you're doing something wrong."
    • You keep pointing at the fact that Biden got so many votes as proof of cheating, when it’s actually proof of something else… Trump motivates people to get off of the couch, register, and vote for ANYBODY BUT TRUMP.  And instead of looking in the mirror and recognizing that the problem is you (the person who nominates a candidate that most people HATE) you blame the people who vote against him.    Haley pulled down 22% of the votes in the most recent Republican  primary. Those votes were cast AFTER she’d already dropped out of the race.    Trump is going to lose the fourth consecutive election cycle since he beat the even more unlikable Hillary in  2016. The Dems learned from their mistake (nominating a despised candidate in ‘16). The Rs keep nominating the same guy that most people hate and expecting different results.    Dems roll in November. 
    • Not yet, anyway. If you can't see that there has been a strong effort to create gender dysphoria amongst young folks AND try to keep it from parents in many instances, you're not paying attention. You may not care about this, but it's ridiculous to ridicule those that do. There is an agenda behind this, no doubt about it, like bullets pointed out earlier, it's just a name change...for now. And it was only very recently that girls were allowed to join the "boy scouts", they have been allowed to join certain other groups that weren't available to girls at the time. It's the frog in the slow boil.
    • Bullard 10  LCM - 4  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...