Jump to content

Texan live slacking on local broadcasts!


setxathlete14

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

According to UIL, a broadcast entity has to have permission from both schools to broadcast that game.

If a school has sold their video broadcast rights to an outside entity, that entity reserves the right to allow or disallow another video broadcast at that home school's stadium. Sometimes it's mainly about having enough space in a press box for two video broadcasts. Other times it's about $$$. If one entity has the rights and they charge to watch their broadcast, it's highly unlikely that they would allow a free video broadcast to do that same game at the home stadium.

In Anahuac's case (and others similar) who have their own video production, they can deny another schools video broadcast at Anahuac's home stadium. They have the video rights. Just remember, if a school denies another school broadcast access, expect the same to be done to you when you go to their stadium. This is only for regular season games. All playoff games are under Texan Live video rights.

Thank you.  I like your 3rd to last sentence.  That's where the fun starts...2 superintendents in a urination contest is always entertaining. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Texan Live isn't big enough to buy that many. Don't forget, they pay UIL for all the playoff games.

Some schools turn down TL because they have their own video production. TL also doesn't solicit every local school. It's about viewership and potential sponsorship for those broadcasts.

Thank you for the insight 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hagar said:

They did have Silsbee vs Vidor the first week.  I can understand why they haven’t shown Vidor again.  😂😂😂👽👽😂😂😂

The game was done because TL has a contract with Silsbee. Vidor just happened to be the opponent. Game was supposed to be a home game for Silsbee.

TL has done every Silsbee game so far this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

According to UIL, a broadcast entity has to have permission from both schools to broadcast that game.

If a school has sold their video broadcast rights to an outside entity, that entity reserves the right to allow or disallow another video broadcast at that home school's stadium. Sometimes it's mainly about having enough space in a press box for two video broadcasts. Other times it's about $$$. If one entity has the rights and they charge to watch their broadcast, it's highly unlikely that they would allow a free video broadcast to do that same game at the home stadium.

In Anahuac's case (and others similar) who have their own video production, they can deny another schools video broadcast at Anahuac's home stadium. They have the video rights. Just remember, if a school denies another school broadcast access, expect the same to be done to you when you go to their stadium. This is only for regular season games. All playoff games are under Texan Live video rights.

It depends on if TL decides to go to that playoff game. If they don't, then the school can petition the uil the do their own game. We've done it once or twice with them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ThaGhost said:

It depends on if TL decides to go to that playoff game. If they don't, then the school can petition the uil the do their own game. We've done it once or twice with them!

Correct. TL isn't able to do every playoff game but they do have the rights and schools have to get permission from UIL and TL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well prescribe to this in hopes of watching Orange County games.  Gary Stelly (KOGT) does an outstanding job but can't be at everyone of the games.  Due to responsibilities at home with my elderly mother living with me, I can't just jump up and go anymore.  It was sure nice to hear or watch the games from my home.  I did make the first LCM game but was rained out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    hinab
    Newest Member
    hinab
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
    • *** Moved to High School Baseball Forum***
    • You just analogized to a tee the situation going on with the Trump New York trial. And I bet you can't even see the hypocrisy elicited out of your hatred. You once again outed yourself...without any realization of your actions. I'm not sure if Reagan actually set you up to expose your blatant hypocrisy, or if it was just a happy coincidence. You seem to thrive on humiliating yourself. Now get to work on providing that evidence of your emphatic declarations that Trump's economy was horrible. You failed miserably before, I bet you will again.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...