Jump to content

Bridge City vs WOS


adminbaberuth

Recommended Posts

first of all good to see kj dad on here.

Second of all BC is NOT even close to the level the Mustangs are.  Next week you will be just like Nederland and Lcm saying wow the Mustangs really are on a whole new level.  

This mustang team is the best it's been in a while.  If you know football you know that means a lot coming from this program.  

BC will be fine but Friday night they will meet a team that will be unstoppable on both sides of the ball.  

It's funny that everyone thinks they run the best slot t and that we won't be able to stop it.  
I can't wait to leave BC fans shaking their heads while we light up the score board.  

And a win in 7th grade... Well I'm glad y'all have something positive to hang your hat on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

We didn't have any problems scoring during our scrimmage vs WOS last year. I know, it's just a scrimmage, the stangs have gotten better, the field was wet, the WR didn't go where Jack wanted him to, blah, blah, blah. 

I hope the kids over there  are reading this crap and believing that we don't have a chance.

 

Y'all scored on INT...Your offense didn't score and we only played 2 quarters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, BC is back said:

What does this class of seniors have to do with any loss given to BC by WOS on a varsity level? The only past that matters is the past between these 2 classes which goes back a while. We get it you've beaten us 24 times but none of that will matter come Friday night

You won't mind if I quote you at 11pm Friday night, will you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

But we scored, right?

 

Didn't we get a FG or two?  I was thinking it was unofficially 13-14 WOS. I can't remember.  

From an earlier post. THE Record

 

1986 WOS 28-7

1987 WOS 35-0

1988 WOS 20-0

1989 WOS 57-7

1990 WOS 65-15

1991 WOS 42-14

1992 WOS 54-7 

1993 WOS 31-14

1994 WOS 48-7

1995 WOS 48-0

1996 WOS 24-21

1997 WOS 60-7

1998 WOS 27-6

1999 WOS 35-0

2004 WOS 27-21

2005 WOS 41-34

2006 WOS 42-6

2007 WOS 73-0

2008 WOS 66-7

2009 WOS 29-15

2010 WOS 28-0

2011 WOS 21-16

2012 WOS 46-0

2013 WOS 40-16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bridge city fan no doubt, but the cards are not on the same level. Looking forward to Friday. 

 

It seems some people from bc think this team is special, I hope they are right good luck cards. 

 

I dont see this team being as good as some of the past bc teams btw. Jmo 

peebles, knight 

 

sparks, Armand, Dishon 

 

these guys played on some great BC teams and I just don't see them comparing to these past teams. 

 

Wos 42+ to BC14

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, td said:

I'd say both teams are different!

 

They are . ND this my thing. I think the game will be descent for a quarter. Of both teams slugging it out. And as the game goes on for the next couple of quarters that jd3 starts to pile up the numbers. I've watched BC games on hudl.nd they played 2 horrible teams that couldn't tackle. ND now the media ND sum ppl are hyping this game up for nothing. Jd ND his crew. is one of the best group of wrs  to ever play at w.o. bc so many kids gets a chance to catch the ball .Bc db's aren't that gud. ND not to mention the defense one of the best to ever come through. ND I'm not saying w.o  can't be challenge! ! Teams like memorial, png,West brook,central ,silsbeee,and maybe even Lumberton cud really make dem come on with it.point is bc has so many matchup problems that I don't know if they can stay within 30pts of this team. Hell I didn't even mention the special teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, td said:

I'd say both teams are different!

 

They are . ND this my thing. I think the game will be descent for a quarter. Of both teams slugging it out. And as the game goes on for the next couple of quarters that jd3 starts to pile up the numbers. I've watched BC games on hudl.nd they played 2 horrible teams that couldn't tackle. ND now the media ND sum ppl are hyping this game up for nothing. Jd ND his crew. is one of the best group of wrs  to ever play at w.o. bc so many kids gets a chance to catch the ball .Bc db's aren't that gud. ND not to mention the defense one of the best to ever come through. ND I'm not saying w.o  can't be challenge! ! Teams like memorial, png,West brook,central ,silsbeee,and maybe even Lumberton cud really make dem come on with it.point is bc has so many matchup problems that I don't know if they can stay within 30pts of this team. Hell I didn't even mention the special teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • The problem as well as that all of the social justice warriors, influencers, and instigators repeat these lies in the immediate days after the event, garnering outrage.  But when they're proven false they never go back and rescind their outrage-causing posts, they just move on to the next one.
    • I just find it really hard to believe that Trump will select a VP based on the votes they bring him.  He's going to want a Trumper that will affirm his every move and stoke his ego.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I doubt it.  And as you said, in these battle ground states a few tenths of a % point may be enough to swing the whole election.  Trump can't afford a VP who will cost him votes (Noem would cost him full points, not just tenths), but also needs a candidate that will bring in as many votes as possible.  So hopefully whichever Trump disciple he chooses has some political appeal to swing voters.
    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...