Jump to content

More BISD mess


AggiesAreWe

Recommended Posts

I really don't understand how the school board has any support at this point.  Other than the one or two who have been openly fighting the majority for the last few years, it seems to me that they were either complicit in how we've gotten to this point, or, almost as bad, willfully ignorant.  Either way, wholesale changes should have been demanded by their voters long ago.  I only hope that when the elections are instituted again, serious lessons have been learned.  This has been an embarrassing black eye for the city and an injustice for our kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the state takes over today, there still will be layoffs tomorrow. Stop wasting money and get on with it. Personally, I want every person on the board replaced because they allowed this to happen. None of them were doing their job. Everybody warned that no one would be happy if the state took over.

 

I just wonder where all this "community action" was in 1995 when the state was going to take over BISD because the students couldn't read. Everybody (me too) complained about Dr. Thomas' salary but I know he got his contract because the others turned down the job and they begged him to take it. He initially withdrew from consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ll take boring for 2 years to right this ship.....

 

Staying out of the news means your doing something right......cause seldom do we hear good news on anything via the NEWS.

 

REMEMBER "EDUCATION" is about the students and the future of our community, state, and country.

 

The examiner may go out of business when the state takes over....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ll take boring for 2 years to right this ship.....

 

Staying out of the news means your doing something right......cause seldom do we hear good news on anything via the NEWS.

 

REMEMBER "EDUCATION" is about the students and the future of our community, state, and country.

 

The examiner may go out of business when the state takes over....

LOL!!!! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't understand how the school board has any support at this point.  Other than the one or two who have been openly fighting the majority for the last few years, it seems to me that they were either complicit in how we've gotten to this point, or, almost as bad, willfully ignorant.  Either way, wholesale changes should have been demanded by their voters long ago.  I only hope that when the elections are instituted again, serious lessons have been learned.  This has been an embarrassing black eye for the city and an injustice for our kids.

I've said those other two board members are sham artist as well. One of them was caught doing the very thing he "despises". No sympathy for those two guys either. We talk about Race, those two used race as a way to ride under the radar & throw stones & hide their hands. Just as we claim Dr Chag new about Dr Thomas, surely therse two members were in on quite a few shady dealings as well. I guess Hipocracy only goes so far with these two. If we're moving in another direction, why bring old dusty furniture into your new digs?

Wake up!!!!  By the way, TEA ain't raising as much Hell as they claimed they would. Say what you want, this board doesn't seem as dumb as it appears either.  Just an observational opinion :lol: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They voted for teacher cuts and closing Austin Middle - no surprise.  We will see how many "administration" jobs actually get cut.  :rolleyes:

 

http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/Don-t-appeal-crowd-chants-to-board-5575229.php

This is very unfortunate for our kids & teachers. God willing,  TEA will do what they say and turn things around. I saw an article somewhere stating how long it took N. Forest litigations to be completed. Let's just say nearly a decade if I remember/read correctly.  WOW!!!

Prayer & Patience :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is very unfortunate for our kids & teachers. God willing,  TEA will do what they say and turn things around. I saw an article somewhere stating how long it took N. Forest litigations to be completed. Let's just say nearly a decade if I remember/read correctly.  WOW!!!

Prayer & Patience :) 

 

I believe this is somewhat a different scenario, TEA is not trying to completely shut down the district just replace the board and super.  I don't think it will stretch out that long, but may extend into the next school year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this is somewhat a different scenario, TEA is not trying to completely shut down the district just replace the board and super.  I don't think it will stretch out that long, but may extend into the next school year.

When will they vote on a new board and supt? I may have missed the date.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When will they vote on a new board and supt? I may have missed the date.

 

The TEA or the school district?  As far as the ISD goes, they are still trying to hash out what format they want either the 5-2 or 7 independent voting areas.  The TEA won't be able to do anything until the district either stops appealing or exhausts all appeals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They voted for teacher cuts and closing Austin Middle - no surprise. We will see how many "administration" jobs actually get cut. :rolleyes:

http://www.beaumontenterprise.com/news/article/Don-t-appeal-crowd-chants-to-board-5575229.php


Closing Austin Middle School is a good thing...they only had around 30 students walking the hallways... IMO I think they should close King as well they have about the same if not lesser students!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Closing Austin Middle School is a good thing...they only had around 30 students walking the hallways... IMO I think they should close King as well they have about the same if not lesser students!!!

 

I think last count was 280 total for Austin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just wonder where all this "community action" was in 1995 when the state was going to take over BISD because the students couldn't read.

 

 

That's an excellent point, and I think it hinges on one factor: the students. In 1995, the students never stood up and never did anything. Twenty years later, for every adult you're seeing at these rallies, you're seeing a student, too. The news was quick to point out that the biggest round of applause to follow any individual speaker at the BISD board meeting came after a West Brook student spoke. I've seen interviews with students from all three BISD high schools on the news in the past few weeks.

 

It could be argued that the students are more aggravated this time around because of the layoffs - because the students were seeing the very real and tangible consequences of poor management by the school board for the first time. But I think it can be attributed at least partially to a different generation operating under different circumstances. In 1995, the economy was good and jobs were plentiful. Today, the economy is anemic at best and the percentage of the population in the workforce is at its lowest since records first started being kept. To say it succinctly, the job market is more competitive than it's ever been, and the determining factor for who among new entrants in the job market actually gets a job, as well as among college applicants, is often the quality of their prior education. Right now, BISD isn't sitting too pretty in that regard. Throw in a dash of social media, which has made social movements that much easier to get off the ground and nearly cultivated a revolution all its own among young people in Iran in 2009, and you have a recipe for a much more active student body. When students are riled, parents are just that much more riled, and that's what I think is leading to the more visual protests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
    • 🤣🤣🤣  Right on schedule!!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...