bullets13

PA 31-21

Bingo. After his first term I said he was a jerk but did a pretty good job. Thought that his attitude turned off potential voters, which it clearly did. The dems were in such shambles that he got elected again. This time he's an even bigger jerk but he's done a bad job. Except for the border, as you mentioned.

I struggle to understand the people who still staunchly support Trump. Would I vote for him again over Biden? Obviously. But he's done way more harm than good to the Republican party, especially during this election cycle. You don't have to agree with me, but the proof will be in the midterms. the left is nuttier and less electable than it's ever been, and they're about to make significant gains. It almost defies logic.

for what it's worth, someone definitely made this up. confirmed AI.

Affidavit: Suspect confesses to fatal shooting in Beaumont And one from beaumont.

Affidavit: Suspect jumped onto pickup hood, got in seat, trailer ran over victim Rough one from Port Neches

HF hasn't had a particularly tough schedule, but after going 10-27 last year they're off to an 8-1 start, which is a nice improvement.

For once Texas deservedly top-5, and not just overhyped. I think the Ags are ranked too high, though. With a much tougher schedule this year i'll be impressed if they don't revert back to their usual 4 losses.

I'll do updates from the HF/OF scrimmage thursday.

Did the D1 blue chipper move from South Houston to Shadow Creek because of the 6-point difference between the schools’ TEA report cards or was it the 8-win difference between the football teams… I guess we’ll never know 🙄

Jones might be leaving an even bigger hole on the defensive side. I think relatively competitive is reasonable, but they're only contending for second, and only because Barbers Hill got their second "not for athletic reasons" quarterback transfer in two years.

Was a good chance to win 3 or 4. Next two series are make or break at this point.

I don't think enough people have put enough stock into how much Jones and Watley meant to this team. There's no "adjusting" to losing them. They won't be a bad team, but this isn't gonna be close to last year's team.

some would say it was because of their superior learning environment...

Talked to a coworker whose son plays and she said HF beat up on Huffman pretty good, but I don't have any details on how it went down other than she said "HF made it into the endzone 7 times and Huffman maybe twice". Not sure how it went during the controlled or live portions of the scrimmage, or how accurate her report is, but she mostly knows what's going on. Watching Broussard in practice this year, he's getting scary good.

that's a tough one for sure.

oh yeah, I know how it works. TEA is using scores that come from DISD, though.

for sure, if it's legit. I truly don't know. Hard to trust stuff coming out of DISD sometimes... In 2025 DISD had only 11 Ds and 2 Fs out of over 200 schools. I find that pretty unbelievable. To put that into perspective, BISD had 7 Ds and 7 Fs with only 23 campuses last school year. That said, if DISD's score are truly accurate then that's a definite eye opener to how dysfunctional BISD has been.

I hope it's legit. I'm suspicious of any school that jumps from 65 to 86 in one year and climbs nearly 30 points in 3 years, especially when it's a campus that's traditionally gotten D/F ratings. maybe they have an amazing new administration or something.

I just need to know if Spuds is gonna pass to Logs and if Roadrunner will be rushing and Cleats will be kicking.

Best case IMO is 5-5 and finishing 2nd in the district. Worst case is 2-8 and finishing 4th. They're a playoff team because of how weak the district is beyond PNG. In my best case scenario they find a way to pick up a non-district win (super tough start to the season) and then only lose to PNG in district. In my worst case scenario they go 0-4 pre-district, which is a real possibility, and then get beat by Texas City, PNG, and Dayton in district.

I'm pretty confident the schools in South Oak Cliff's district would be perfectly okay forgoing the marginal players that transfer into their school if it meant they could keep their most talented players that they no doubt lose to schools like SOC. It's far more likely, at least in the case of SOC, that Dallas ISD pressures the other coaches in the district to allow it to happen.

My buddy has a place on Cedar Crest Circle, if you know where that is.

I agree with everything bolded. As for the sour grapes, sometimes they're warranted. My team will never lose to SOC in a state final game, so while I have an opinion on the matter, it doesn't affect me the same way it's affected PNG. If I lived there I'm sure I'd be a lot more passionate about the subject. I'm also sure there have been plenty of sour grapes in Silsbee over the last decade when their basketball teams deserving of being state champions have lost out to houston teams or Faith Family because of a broken system. And i personally don't blame anyone from Silsbee a bit if they're still upset. As for SOC, there's a difference between having done no wrong and not having been caught doing wrong. Is it possible that every D1 player that transfers in is doing so on their own with no encouragement or interference from the coaching staff? I suppose it is. But that seems unlikely, and I'm not sure how anyone could be confident saying that it's happening that way.

i have mixed feelings on the topic at hand, but having read through this thread it's definitely worth noting that you're being a bit obtuse on this one (intentionally, no doubt, as you're no dummy). While it is inarguable that schools gain and lose students every year, it's also inarguable that there are a few schools who consistently gain new students who "coincidentally" happen to be D1 football recruits. It's obvious what happens at several of these schools, but in some it's provable through common sense. Let's take SOC, for example, which is a C-rated campus, and is located in South Oak Cliff, an F-tier community to live in. it's kind of hard to find a really valid reason why the recruits (i mean transfers) have moved from A or B rated school districts, generally MUCH safer neighborhoods, and areas with more job opportunities and housing other than football. As for your **, generally transfers who are transferring for non-football reasons aren't transferring to schools that have great football programs, and also aren't transferring to schools getting large numbers of obvious football related transfers. If shepherd gets a stray running back move-in here or there, or some kid from beaumont moves out to HF, etc, it's one thing. But something tells me if half of the D-1 recruits from around SETX started moving into HF every season and were allowed to play lots of folks would have lots to say about it, including the coaching staff of Shepherd (regardless of what their PAPFs say).