Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Pretty much true. But good for us! [Hidden Content]
  3. Sells was a stud. Very fluid and made that team go… speaking of Bush, one of the most exciting players to watch in high school basketball. Put him in a 6’3” frame in today’s NIL would be interesting.
  4. Or they were at camps etc...Silsbee signed up for this one late so the kids may have had other things planned....good chance for younger guys to get reps and they didnt perform poorly at all
  5. Today
  6. The Biden administration let millions of illegals in, while claiming White Domestic terrorism was the next biggest threat..... Yet - here we are ........ If they are here illegally THEY NEED TO GO......QUICKLY [Hidden Content]
  7. Wrong……once again. [Hidden Content]
  8. LOL......If he understands the constitution so well, why did he win only 46% of the cases (both terms) brought to the Supreme Court..... Overall, the administration has managed a record of 79–96, a win rate of just above 45 percent. There’s little difference between the first term’s 35–44 (just above 44 percent) and second term’s 44–52 (just below 46 percent). [Hidden Content]
  9. I’m a Texas fan, but this made me chuckle. Poor showing from the Horns this weekend after struggling down the stretch in the regular season.
  10. Didn't Bryant shut them out for the first 5 innings and then they brought Nutter in and they scored a couple of runs? And then in the 7th they brought Bryant back in? That lineup they were facing is unreal and most of them will be back next season.
  11. No, they played in the state final in '92.
  12. Agree 100%. Lot going on this week for many families. Also, sometimes kids just need a mental break.
  13. Here’s another of your brethren. A makeshift flamethrower and yelling “free Palestine”, the libs should pat him on the back and say “good job”. Maybe one of your judges will step in and cover for him, you know, one of them dictator judges. [Hidden Content]
  14. Here you go libs. What fair process should these lovable teens receive? Remember, never care about the victim. [Hidden Content]
  15. Yes, I guess being swept by Missouri and Texas and also losing to the same UTSA team, coupled with not even making the tournament, and being the quickest team ever going from #1 to unranked, would most definitely be the reasoning behind such a post.
  16. I don't think this had anything to do with commitment.
  17. Who changed the wording?
  18. Barring a miracle UTSA is about to beat UT for the second time in 3 days and put them out. That UTSA lineup is stacked!
  19. I never question Fuller. I think Bryant was the correct choice. Think about it, as awesome as Nutter is, she was coming off a no-hitter. Its extremely hard to replicate a phenomenal outing the next time for any athlete. Great thing for BH is about 2/3 of the team is Sophs. Including Bryant.
  20. Makes some question their commitment to the program.
  21. You now make the rules?
  22. So, illegals cross the border, get rounded up and bused back to Mexico, but that’s not considered a deportation due to wording. You libs stop at nothing. What a joke you and your party have truly become. Just like Obama’s cages for detention are called concentration camps under Trump. Your party is trash. You defend illegals over real Americans…..including gang members, hamas, and cartels. Why don’t you go to Colorado and throw molotav cocktails at Jews. I hear that’s the new trend. You should be proud.
  23. No issue with the question. It’s a valid one. I basically already answered it in my response to SmashMouth earlier. It doesn’t fit a pure Libertarian Party mantra. Just like the Libertarian Party supports open borders. However, there are as many different types of libertarians (little L) as there are liberals & conservatives. I am a limited government/states rights fiscally conservative libertarian. Again, little L. I recognize the need for government involvement in certain areas, and I don’t believe in open borders until we fix the welfare state. In those instances where government wants to be involved, It should go to the voters for approval. This is an instance that’s been shown to be very successful for cancer research using the Texas model, and the private sector is not ALWAYS the be-all-end-all. The private sector runs on profits as we all know. This effort—which will go before the voters as a possible Constitutional Amendment—would be using taxpayer money (with their permission) for a common cause that is projected to save money on State funded medical costs in the future, and generate tax revenue for Texas in the mean time. That’s what the Texas Cancer Research Institute does now, and has done since 2007. I don’t think it would be proposed if it didn’t have some monetary benefit for the State even if it is compassionate. And yes, being at the State level (closer to the people) makes a difference to me. Plus, it wouldn’t be a ‘government agency’ in that sense. It would be funded with taxpayer money, but run like a private entity with all grants peer reviewed and approved by ‘expert’ peers—not politicians—before authorization. It also would be audited like a business. I’m okay with it since it would be approved by the taxpayers paying for it for—hopefully—their benefit if needed. Texas has also shown to be good stewards for the Cancer Institute. It’s also a hybrid model of government/private sector. No real difference between it and funding University research—except overhead is capped at a much lower level, and the efforts would have to relocate to Texas. If it wasn’t being proposed to the voters, I’d have more questions. You should read the links I’ve posted. They’ll give you more info, and probably explain to you more why I’m okay with it. Chances are, it won’t help my wife. We’re on borrowed time already as she was diagnosed in 2018 & life expectancy is 6-8 years for most with her condition. But, hopefully it can help others. Basically, it’s a proven, good use of public funds in my estimation that would have public approval and more local control. Libertarian philosophy doesn’t mean no government. It means a limited, approved, justified government that doesn’t infringe on personal liberty. More people are libertarian than what they realize.
  24. Did Obama deported the most illegals in history [Hidden Content]
  1. Load more activity


×
×
  • Create New...