Jump to content

What’s more American…


CardinalBacker

Recommended Posts

…than a Trump Supporter shooting up a Fourth of July parade? 
 

Can’t believe somebody hasn’t already started a thread here filled with “not a single inch” or “where was the outrage during the BLM riots?”

For people that have a lot to say about everything, y’all sure go quiet when one of your boys jumps off of the rails.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

…than a Trump Supporter shooting up a Fourth of July parade? 
 

Can’t believe somebody hasn’t already started a thread here filled with “not a single inch” or “where was the outrage during the BLM riots?”

For people that have a lot to say about everything, y’all sure go quiet when one of your boys jumps off of the rails.  

 

He’s a POS just like the BLM crowd.  That make you feel better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

…than a Trump Supporter shooting up a Fourth of July parade? 
 

Can’t believe somebody hasn’t already started a thread here filled with “not a single inch” or “where was the outrage during the BLM riots?”

For people that have a lot to say about everything, y’all sure go quiet when one of your boys jumps off of the rails.  

 

What makes you think he was a Trump  supporter……such as yourself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

…than a Trump Supporter shooting up a Fourth of July parade? 
 

Can’t believe somebody hasn’t already started a thread here filled with “not a single inch” or “where was the outrage during the BLM riots?”

For people that have a lot to say about everything, y’all sure go quiet when one of your boys jumps off of the rails.  

 

Let me guess….Trump even provided the gun and ammo? Please provide the source of your accusation. Wrong is wrong regardless of the affiliation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

…than a Trump Supporter shooting up a Fourth of July parade? 
 

Can’t believe somebody hasn’t already started a thread here filled with “not a single inch” or “where was the outrage during the BLM riots?”

For people that have a lot to say about everything, y’all sure go quiet when one of your boys jumps off of the rails.  

 

Wrong again, my friend!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Wrong again, my friend!

This is the hidden content, please

From the article 

"If he does happen to claim to be MAGA, he’s definitely NOT a true America First, Make America Great Again guy."

Even the article can't rule him out... whole bunch of tweets from both sides claiming he is or isn't MAGA.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 killed / 62 wounded in Chicago last weekend and not nearly the coverage as this, and this is a problem that can be addressed with no new laws, simply better leadership.

Much harder to convince the low information crowd Chicago is Trump's fault so not nearly the interest from democrats and media.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, baddog said:

Can’t rule him out. lol. Can’t rule you out either. 

Yeah, can’t rule out leaves everyone open to every potential accusation.

We can’t rule out that a person posting in this thread is not a child molester……

It reminds me of the Mueller report on Trump collusion with Russia. We cannot rule out the Trump was illegally involved with Russia, we just can’t find any evidence to prove it.

I guess with the rationale of some people reading this forum, everybody is guilty of everything until it can be proven otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

Yeah, can’t rule out leaves everyone open to every potential accusation.

We can’t rule out that a person posting in this thread is not a child molester……

It reminds me of the Mueller report on Trump collusion with Russia. We cannot rule out the Trump was illegally involved with Russia, we just can’t find any evidence to prove it.

I guess with the rationale of some people reading this forum, everybody is guilty of everything until it can be proven otherwise.

Guilty until proven innocent - liberal describing a conservative.

😂😂😂🤣🤣👽🤣🤣😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

Yeah, can’t rule out leaves everyone open to every potential accusation.

We can’t rule out that a person posting in this thread is not a child molester……

It reminds me of the Mueller report on Trump collusion with Russia. We cannot rule out the Trump was illegally involved with Russia, we just can’t find any evidence to prove it.

I guess with the rationale of some people reading this forum, everybody is guilty of everything until it can be proven otherwise.

Literally from the report:

"[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," Barr quotes from Mueller's report.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Yeah, can’t rule out leaves everyone open to every potential accusation.

We can’t rule out that a person posting in this thread is not a child molester……

It reminds me of the Mueller report on Trump collusion with Russia. We cannot rule out the Trump was illegally involved with Russia, we just can’t find any evidence to prove it.

I guess with the rationale of some people reading this forum, everybody is guilty of everything until it can be proven otherwise.

Doesn’t DNA work that way?……100% exclusion and only 99% positive identity? Something like that.

If you can’t exclude him, then…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

What’s more American than a Dementia Patient playing President on the 4th of July. Smh…

 

 

 

Watch Kamala’s face…..like she’s any better. At least she uses real words that make no sense. Oh yeah, and laughs like a hyena.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

…than a Trump Supporter shooting up a Fourth of July parade? 
 

Can’t believe somebody hasn’t already started a thread here filled with “not a single inch” or “where was the outrage during the BLM riots?”

For people that have a lot to say about everything, y’all sure go quiet when one of your boys jumps off of the rails.  

 

You should of waited,,,,,lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Literally from the report:

"[W]hile this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him," Barr quotes from Mueller's report.

 

You got it. That is what I was talking about. We have no evidence that he did but…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

What’s more American than a Dementia Patient playing President on the 4th of July. Smh…

 

 

 

His only saving grace at the moment is Kamala Harris.

 The Dems are in a quandary at the moment. Anything is subject to change at a moments notice depending on any event however.

I think it was Jim Clyburn out of SC that I saw a week or two ago talking about Harris in the upcoming presidential election. He was given some credit for Biden‘s victory by delivering SC in the election. His comment was something like, we got Biden  elected but it was time for him to go and it is Kamala's turn.

That demonstrates the problem. When a prominent Democrat goes on record pushing for a black female and probably somewhat as a payback, it might be hard for the Democrats to go against him and her. That tends to make me think that the next Democrat in the presidential election will be either Biden or Harris and either can be big problems.

Harris if so disliked by her own party that she could not even get about 3% of the popular vote from Democrats and had to drop out at the beginning of the primary season.

Her serving as VP could tend to overcome earlier non support but her performance has hurt her image, not helped it.

So now they have a guy that is showing signs of dementia and his vice president waiting in the wings in a position that will make it hard for the Democratic leadership to go against her. Which Democrat is going to go on record going against the first Black female VP and then have to debate her she blast her in stage? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...