Jump to content

Nederland @ Crosby


outanup

Recommended Posts

Being in Crosby is going to be a tough call.  Hoping Big Ned continues to get better.  Run defense seemed pretty good last week and that's what we'll need.  Although these running backs are going to have a little more physical speed.  Containing will be the issue.  It's good to hear that they have passing issues.  Dogs by 7.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

I wouldn't base too much off of stopping Vidors' offense. They stink this year and plus they stopped themselves if I remember correctly

They went Air-Raid on someone's D this yr, they're capable of doing some stuff on O. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Bigdog said:

They were good enough to beat Crosby right?

10-10-7-6 , That’s what the offense has scored in the last four games since beating Crosby. We’ve scored more points in that Crosby game than all four of the last games combined! So I would say the offense is struggling. Defense has been rock solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Physical Atmosphere said:

Do you think that just because Vidor beat Crosby that Ned will also beat them ? It doesn't work like that

no.  I know better than that.   It looks like Ned's defense is playing better than earlier this season.  They need to get the offense clicking and cut down on the penalties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,950
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • This is an easy one. We have let grifter unqualified coaches infiltrate our children and convince them that they will be D1 athletes if they only focus on a single sport. We've got kids, with single digit ages, playing their sport year-round to "maximize exposure" despite the fact that most college coaches on the recruiting trail will value a multisport athlete. This translates to the school year and ends up with kids being football, basketball, baseball only kids. Track is pretty much the only one left that keeps kids playing other sports and that's primarily because football coaches demand their football kids be track athletes. I literally talked to a man last night, who just moved to Texas from Oklahoma who was telling me his kid played on two different football teams during the season last year. One for his school, one for his select league. During the week the kid was a RB for his school, and on the weekends, he was a QB for his select team. This would equal 7 days a week of full contact football for a 6th grader......6th grader. Once that ends, rolls straight into 7 on 7 for the spring and back to football in the summer. All this for a kid, who seems to be a good athlete, but probably has a ceiling of D2 at best, if he doesn't burn out before that. Parents are silly and think they can develop their kids into being the next Quinn Ewers, but they completely miss the biggest factor in creating that type of athlete.....genetics. Genetics are undefeated. Always have been, always will be. Play sports because you love to compete then compete in everything you do. Quit giving bullsheet rings to "state champions" every single weekend all over the US and get back to valuing team championships won at the community level to build the continuity when they are young. This is the only way to reestablish the pride once felt by every kid in every town across Texas when they got to put on a uniform with their school colors. Otherwise, we can kiss the magic of high school sports goodbye. 
    • We are proud for sure! It was a great game!
    • I hear you but I don't think this is going to ding her political career as much as some think, especially in SD.  
    • It doesn't bother me a bit. It was just unnecessary and foolish to not consider the repercussions. No doubt it also reflects on where we are as a country. That's why she needs to be better at "reading the room".  Save the story for your "after political career" biography.
    • Didn't think I'd get a response...
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...