Jump to content

West Orange-Stark 51 Silsbee 2/FINAL

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 366
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

AggiesAreWe
AggiesAreWe

I actually like the fact that Coach Smith went for it on those three 4th and goals instead of kicking field goals. But, in hindsight, the score could be 14-9. Maybe a different play call on one

HeHateMe
HeHateMe

Maybe he just don't like Silsbee? Get better, compete so your not in situations like this. 

TxHoops
TxHoops

That kid is a hoss.  He's going to get his against just about anybody.  He's thunder and more thunder.  I also would guess about 90 percent of his yards against WOS came after contact.  I was more tha

TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Smh. If the hold didn't occur, you might've gotten tackled in the end zone, that would have resulted in a safety.  Or worse, he might've fumbled and gave up a Silsbee touchdown... You held go stop the safety from happening...

It was called on #21 per the ref to the WOS coaching staff.  That's Shaw.  Who straight up pancaked the dude.  Shoulda called blocking too violently....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kicker

kicker

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Smh. If the hold didn't occur, you might've gotten tackled in the end zone, that would have resulted in a safety.  Or worse, he might've fumbled and gave up a Silsbee touchdown... You held go stop the safety from happening...

Nope! I'm trying to post the vid but it won't let me. Straight up pancake, no hold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

KFDM tailgate party has it on their Facebook page.. Clearly a pancake

Yep.  No doubt about it. 

 

3 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

So you're saying it wasn't a hold at all?

Not even close to a hold.  But to be fair to the refs, you don't often see a tailback laying the wood on a block like that so they were probably confused  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-Train11

L-Train11

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I just seen the video.  #5 for Silsbee was clearly held, which was the kick out block...

Ok I just went and rewatched, I see what your talking about.. But if that's the case that didn't look like it was in the end zone so it should have been half the distance to the goal line then right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I just seen the video.  #5 for Silsbee was clearly held, which was the kick out block...

 

4 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Ok I just went and rewatched, I see what your talking about.. But if that's the case that didn't look like it was in the end zone so it should have been half the distance to the goal line then right?

A) Not the person the refs say the hold was on. 

B ) Not sure how that's clearly a hold when the blocker's hands were "inside" as they are supposed to be and when the Tiger spins around and chases, he does so cleanly, which would "clearly" indicate a lack of a hold. 

and C) L-Train's right, if that's the hold, safety should not have been awarded because it wasn't in the end zone.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,972
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • CardinalBacker
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      No worries. My thing is this. Trump was badly flawed. We knew it going into 2016. As an incumbent, there really wasn’t much of a chance to nominate a different candidate in 2020. But after all that happened during Trump’s term, the election loss and fiasco that followed, and everything else that he’s been a part of since… we should have chosen a different nominee in 2024. That’s been my point all along, but that’s not what we did. His followers are very vocal and infect all levels of the Republican Party leadership-especially in local counties and precincts. Enough people decided that Trump is the only person who should be considered to be the eventual R candidate that he cruised to the nomination in spite of everything, purely based on the cult of personality, IMO.  All of the signs were there. Trump is in a dead heat with Biden and has been all along, while every other potential R candidate enjoyed double digit leads over Biden. Literally all we had to do is pick someone over Trump and they’d cruise to a win over Biden-but we’d rather lose with Trump than win with someone else.    Names like Gary Hart and John Edwards come to mind. Those guys were Dems with a small fraction of Trump’s baggage, but the party still dumped them and moved on… I can’t understand why the Rs have refused to self-police and choose someone with decency… who would also be able to win the popular vote. We (the Rs) should have made DJT an old memory… but force the Ds and independents to do it for us. 
    • Boyz N Da Hood
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By Boyz N Da Hood · Posted

      Trump literally ran on locking up hillary... ppl seem to 4get that
    • Gocats90
      Orangefield vs. Franklin - Post Updates/Scores here!

      By Gocats90 · Posted

      Currently in a monsoon raining badly here in Lufkin game will start late 
    • Chester86
      Orangefield vs. Franklin - Post Updates/Scores here!

      By Chester86 · Posted

      Get after ‘em ‘Cats!!!
    • Chester86
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By Chester86 · Posted

      I read your posts and agree on some things and disagree with some.  I guess my one question is (in your opinion) who should we vote for?  Third party candidates do not get elected.  Kennedy is only going to dilute votes which will benefit Democrats.  Write-in votes do not win elections and I’m not even sure they are counted in a presidential election.  Many people get on and express views and tell us what is wrong with X, but never give the answer for Y.  I am extremely sarcastic and passive-aggressive, but genuinely hope this post doesn’t come across that way.  Trump has my vote until someone persuades me otherwise (and I’m a Never Biden).  Had another R been nominated they would have had my vote.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...