Jump to content

SECond to none


team first

Recommended Posts

We shall see.  We will also see how awful your Tigers are this year.  

As for our good years, we have won a championship  and played for another more recently than one of th titles you brag about on here (actually the half title you brag about - everyone knows USC was the real champion that year).  So can I borrow your Delorian when you get done with it?  

 

And to answer your question, no we don't.  However, being an SEC fan, I'm sure your sisters and cousins do...

Herby and Corso disagree.

 

Wrong again, Texas won it in 2005, LSU won it in 2007. 

Texas played BAMA in 2010's championship game.

LSU played BAMA in 2011's championship game. 

Pretty sure LSU's championship and last championship game are more recent than UT's. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Herby and Corso disagree.

 

Wrong again, Texas won it in 2005, LSU won it in 2007. 

Texas played BAMA in 2010's championship game.

LSU played BAMA in 2011's championship game. 

Pretty sure LSU's championship and last championship game are more recent than UT's. 

 

I was speaking of the '03 "Title".  I would have thought the USC reference would have been your fiirst clue.  But that's what I get when assuming you LSU guys have any power of deduction.  

As for going to school, team first, you better hurry.  That short bus is waiting....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was merely pointing out that you guys like to use the time machine argument when it suits you.  I have no issue with it.  

Obviously we have had a down period in our program but it is hopefully on the upswing.  If we are talking history, which the SEC likes to spout about, especially after coming up short of late, try and find a team we don't have a winning record against.  There aren't many.  In the meantime, I hope to enjoy a good game tonight between 2 of 3 winningest programs in CFB history (hint: none of the 3 are from the SEJCC). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't recall anyone that supports Texas or any Big XII team ever suggesting that they are a superior conference in any way. You would say "It's because the Big XII-2 or Big 2" is not a superior conference. However true that may be, it's not relevant.

I could care less about other schools in the Big XII. As a matter of fact, most fans of Big XII schools support their university and NOT the conference. If the Big XII shut down operations TODAY, Texas would be no better or no worse than they are right now. 

Change is taking place in Austin. To quote Selena Kyle:

"There's a storm coming. You and your friends better batten down the hatches, because when it hits, you're all gonna wonder how you ever thought you could live so large and leave so little for the rest of us."

Got to be a smarta**:

Was the storms name Notre Dame?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Auburn showing us just how tough the SEC is with that gritty come-from-behind OT win over FCS school Jacksonville St.  With this impressive win, plus the fact that they're in the SEC, I'm sure Auburn will jump Baylor and TCU in the rankings this week ;)

Edited by bullets13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

waiting on AAW's weekly update on SEC's overall record.  I will require an asterisk with Auburn's OT win over a D2 school. 

that one should count as three losses.  Also, Georgia was in a tight game against dumpster fire Vanderbilt as well.  They won by 17, but vandy threw two picks in the red zone at the end of the game, the second one of which was returned for a TD with about a minute left to account for the slightly more respectable winning margin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NEWton86
    Newest Member
    NEWton86
    Joined



  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   I wish the Ohio AG much success...from the article: Ohio’s Republican Attorney General is pushing back against critics after warning that anti-Israel protesters wearing masks are facing potential prison time due to a little known state law. "The First Amendment protects you and saying whatever it is you have to say. Even hateful things are protected by the First Amendment," Ohio AG Dave Yost told Fox News Digital this week. "The First Amendment, though, was always designed to be a shield against the government. It's not a sword against your fellow students and they have rights too. Your First Amendment rights are limited by their right to be able to go to school, use the library, get the value of their education and the tuition that they paid for." In a letter sent on Monday, Yost warned university presidents of a historic state law that could mean masked anti-Israel demonstrators on college campuses could face felony charges.  "The law is an old law," Yost told Fox News Digital. "It goes back to the 20th century, and it was originally designed to make sure that people like Ku Klux Klan were held accountable, that, of course, the reason that the Ku Klux Klan wore hoods and masks over their faces is so that they couldn't be identified because they were committing crimes. So the General Assembly in Ohio said, okay, you can wear a mask, you can wear a hood, that's fine. But if you commit a crime with two or more other people, while you are masking yourself, we're going to see that as a heightened kind of crime, a worse kind of thing, because you're consciously doing this and trying to hide your identity because you know you're doing something wrong."
    • You keep pointing at the fact that Biden got so many votes as proof of cheating, when it’s actually proof of something else… Trump motivates people to get off of the couch, register, and vote for ANYBODY BUT TRUMP.  And instead of looking in the mirror and recognizing that the problem is you (the person who nominates a candidate that most people HATE) you blame the people who vote against him.    Haley pulled down 22% of the votes in the most recent Republican  primary. Those votes were cast AFTER she’d already dropped out of the race.    Trump is going to lose the fourth consecutive election cycle since he beat the even more unlikable Hillary in  2016. The Dems learned from their mistake (nominating a despised candidate in ‘16). The Rs keep nominating the same guy that most people hate and expecting different results.    Dems roll in November. 
    • Not yet, anyway. If you can't see that there has been a strong effort to create gender dysphoria amongst young folks AND try to keep it from parents in many instances, you're not paying attention. You may not care about this, but it's ridiculous to ridicule those that do. There is an agenda behind this, no doubt about it, like bullets pointed out earlier, it's just a name change...for now. And it was only very recently that girls were allowed to join the "boy scouts", they have been allowed to join certain other groups that weren't available to girls at the time. It's the frog in the slow boil.
    • Bullard 10  LCM - 4  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...