Jump to content

Kirbyville (36) @ East Chambers (6) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

Game Info:


Start: Friday, September 22, 2023 at 7:30:00 PM
Home Team Name/Class/District/Division: East Chambers - 3A-10-1
Record: District Wins: 0, Overall Wins: 0, District Losses: 0, Overall Losses: 1

Visiting Team Name/Class/District/Division: Kirbyville- 3A-10-1
Record: District Wins: 0, Overall Wins: 0, District Losses: 0, Overall Losses: 1

District Matchup: Yes

*Standings do not include this game.

 

INSTRUCTIONS TO LIVE UPDATE THIS GAME ON THE SCOREBOARD: 
Type !!score: or !!: as your "command" then Visitor's Score/Home Score/Quarter

Example: !!score:10/14/4 would be 10 to 14 in the 4th quarter
!!:21/28/2 would be 21 to 28 in the 2nd quarter

Use h or H for halftime, and f or F for final
You may also use - , or | in place of /

Extras: Post the time left in the quarter as minutes/seconds.
Ex:7/0/1/13/25 = 7 to 0, 1st quarter, 13 minutes, 25 seconds left. 



Live Broadcast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EC has a 14-15 year old operating the offense the coach has completely disregarded the 18 year old senior back up for Perrault from last season. He did the same thing last year. You have to give kids the chance Sutherland has screwed Purcell. 2 years in a row. He has the mechanics work ethic athleticism he only lacks experience thanks to the coaching staff . They’ll get trampled all district long and won’t make playoffs because the coach is ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, setxnative453 said:

EC has a 14-15 year old operating the offense the coach has completely disregarded the 18 year old senior back up for Perrault from last season. He did the same thing last year. You have to give kids the chance Sutherland has screwed Purcell. 2 years in a row. He has the mechanics work ethic athleticism he only lacks experience thanks to the coaching staff . They’ll get trampled all district long and won’t make playoffs because the coach is ridiculous.

There are undoubtedly reasons that you have no idea about.  Most importantly.. that it’s completely the coach’s decision.  The coach that continues to be successful.. and led EC on a very deep run relatively recently.  Yeah, I’m trusting his intuition over.. well.. yours for sure.

Certainly you don’t think this kid should’ve played over last year’s district MVP? Certainly not.  Yeah.. it’s bad timing for the kid.

I really don’t have any idea, but, if the senior is evenly remotely close to the young kid as far as talent… I’d personally go with the younger kid.  Because he’ll improve with experience.  Who cares if the senior improves.. for next year? He’ll be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course not Perrault was the truth, however when you are up 30 or down 30 you groom your up and coming. He won’t make play offs this year for that reason the young kid should be getting reps. And playing around the field.  I don’t think it is the best decision it’ll pay off for years to come but completely screwing a kids career is ridiculous shows a lack of dignity . Even Perrault didn’t start his freshman year until it fell in his lap. You have to give kids a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, setxnative453 said:

EC has a 14-15 year old operating the offense the coach has completely disregarded the 18 year old senior back up for Perrault from last season. He did the same thing last year. You have to give kids the chance Sutherland has screwed Purcell. 2 years in a row. He has the mechanics work ethic athleticism he only lacks experience thanks to the coaching staff . They’ll get trampled all district long and won’t make playoffs because the coach is ridiculous.

EC has a great coaching staff and have won a lot of games. Kirbyville is the better team at the moment.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...