Jump to content

It’s Hammer Time


UT alum

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, UT alum said:

Communist?  I’ve never heard him or any other Democrat advocate the state own the means of production (land, labor, capital). Don’t throw that word around lightly. It has specific meaning.

Man, you want your “I’s” dotted and “T’s” crossed when dealing with a communist democrat. He is the epitome of a communist. Forcing mandates that he doesn’t follow himself, suing school districts for not teaching about homosexuality to 4th graders, showed support for blm, ridiculous gun laws that would lead to confiscation (that’s the main one for me). Are you implying that I shouldn’t speak ill of the man? Anyone who would defend him tells me all I need to know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Last person sentenced to death for treason was in 1952 for real war crimes. Talking of killing presidents or anyone because a difference of political thoughts is crazy and dangerous. 
 

Its no logical debate to be had.

We have to stop trying to jail everyone we don't agree with politically......

I admit, Trump was part of the movement that got this rolling.....but he was a,so the victim of it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Last person sentenced to death for treason was in 1952 for real war crimes. Talking of killing presidents or anyone because a difference of political thoughts is crazy and dangerous. 
 

Its no logical debate to be had.

Don’t twist my words. It’s not for a political difference, but for selling favors to our enemies. I’ll argue that till I die. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Last person sentenced to death for treason was in 1952 for real war crimes. Talking of killing presidents or anyone because a difference of political thoughts is crazy and dangerous. 
 

Its no logical debate to be had.

I agree with your point about difference of political thought, but whether or not a line gets crossed in a deal with another country that knowingly harms America and it's citizens is always a worthy debate.

Everything should be debated, it's guaranteed in the First Amendment.  No one should ever be given power to decide what's worthy of debate.

I think it's absurd that we're debating what is a man or a woman, but I would never want to call to censor the discussion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I agree with your point about difference of political thought, but whether or not a line gets crossed in a deal with another country that knowingly harms America and it's citizens is always a worthy debate.

Everything should be debated, it's guaranteed in the First Amendment.  No one should ever be given power to decide what's worthy of debate.

I think it's absurd that we're debating what is a man or a woman, but I would never want to call to censor the discussion. 

I will …I’m not debating anyone on what’s female and what’s male. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I will …I’m not debating anyone on what’s female and what’s male. 

And I feel the same way, but I wouldn't want to suppress, by law, someone else's right to debate the point.

If we go that route it will come to something that's important to each of us.

I'm talking about suppression of debate, not refusal of debate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, UT alum said:

James Comer says?  I believe that’s called heresay, and is inadmissible as evidence. Show me some transactions. 

Did you even read the article?  It references specific transactions.

Of course, we all know you could have been watching him make the transactions and it still wouldn’t change your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, UT alum said:

James Comer says?  I believe that’s called heresay, and is inadmissible as evidence. Show me some transactions. 

Hearsay was enough for two impeachments, of which you were 100% behind saying, “We got him this time”! You’re such a stickler for details when it comes to law, why aren’t you that way with everyone? It’s the American way. We all have rights and protection against wrongful charges. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, baddog said:

Hearsay was enough for two impeachments, of which you were 100% behind saying, “We got him this time”! You’re such a stickler for details when it comes to law, why aren’t you that way with everyone? It’s the American way. We all have rights and protection against wrongful charges. 

@UT alum?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, UT alum said:

James Comer says?  I believe that’s called heresay, and is inadmissible as evidence. Show me some transactions. 

The whole discussion is about specific transactions. Lol

Like Baddog said, you don’t care about specifics when it comes to Trump. 😂

Of course when you live in 🤡🌎 that’s to be expected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

 

What’s being totally ignored about how bad it is, is that Obama knew. You can bank on it. 
 

 

Not only knew, but he is part of it, just like Pelosi, Schumer, Schiff, and probably lots of others. Trump was about to blow it wide open, just like what’s happening now. Illegal gains made from insider info, climate change, infrastructure (Schumer with his fist pump), send it to Ukraine and have it laundered, then stuff it in an offshore account. Of course all leftys deny any wrongdoing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,951
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Or a less lethal option would be to have law enforcement yell improper pronouns at them...they'd scatter like sheep. I still prefer your way, lol.
    • I ve seen this done in several other countries.  And in those countries it happens very lil because of the severity of the consequences.   I saw a video of other world leaders ask “why does America allow such destructiveness” when all the civil unrest was happening because a criminal/criminals were killed  by not following commands.     we have a great system in place but it’s been compromised and we could still learn from other countries.
    • I am out of VOTES, but I will give a BIG AMEN!!!!
    • You start opening fire and drop about 10 or 12 of these protesting morons it will break up pretty quick.    This ties in with killing the chicken killing dog.
    • This is an easy one. We have let grifter unqualified coaches infiltrate our children and convince them that they will be D1 athletes if they only focus on a single sport. We've got kids, with single digit ages, playing their sport year-round to "maximize exposure" despite the fact that most college coaches on the recruiting trail will value a multisport athlete. This translates to the school year and ends up with kids being football, basketball, baseball only kids. Track is pretty much the only one left that keeps kids playing other sports and that's primarily because football coaches demand their football kids be track athletes. I literally talked to a man last night, who just moved to Texas from Oklahoma who was telling me his kid played on two different football teams during the season last year. One for his school, one for his select league. During the week the kid was a RB for his school, and on the weekends, he was a QB for his select team. This would equal 7 days a week of full contact football for a 6th grader......6th grader. Once that ends, rolls straight into 7 on 7 for the spring and back to football in the summer. All this for a kid, who seems to be a good athlete, but probably has a ceiling of D2 at best, if he doesn't burn out before that. Parents are silly and think they can develop their kids into being the next Quinn Ewers, but they completely miss the biggest factor in creating that type of athlete.....genetics. Genetics are undefeated. Always have been, always will be. Play sports because you love to compete then compete in everything you do. Quit giving bullsheet rings to "state champions" every single weekend all over the US and get back to valuing team championships won at the community level to build the continuity when they are young. This is the only way to reestablish the pride once felt by every kid in every town across Texas when they got to put on a uniform with their school colors. Otherwise, we can kiss the magic of high school sports goodbye. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...