Jump to content

2020 Election Day


PAMFAM10

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Big girl said:

Each state has different rules

True.  But -- according to Article 2 of the Constitution, the state legislatures makes the rules.  The problem in Pennsylvania, is the legislature made rules that basically stated that votes will be in on time.   But, the Penn state supreme court said no, you have to count votes past the deadline.  And, unfortunately, the US Supreme Court was split 4-4 and the lower court was upheld.  But, according to the Article 2,  the courts have no place in dictating this and over ruling the legislatures.  This is what will win it for Trump.  His lawyers will hammer this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, baddog said:

Again, nothing in response to my post. Typical lefty.

Lol, “typical lefty” because I won’t vote for the guy who said I came from a “shithole” country, said black people are “living in hell” and called Mexicans “rapist and drug dealers”. Not to mention the party as a whole where the grand wizard of the KKK can run for the governor’s office and receive 55% of the white vote. Yeah, I think I’ll be ok voting democrat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Realville said:

Video of 14.2 counting ballots! 
 

 

 

I don’t see anybody in there with a gun? No way I would be in a location with groups like the proud boys, boogaloo bois or 1776 patriots gathering outside and not have my new F&N I bought for the election. So it’s definitely not me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Realville said:

Whatever happened to having a Democrat and Republican observer at each table checking off on each ballot! It’s not happening in these swing states. Democrat Governors are not allowing Republican observers to observe. Nothing to see here.

If you watched something besides Fox they would actually show you the one representative from each party who have to agree for the ballot to be counted and the two NPAs that resolve issues if the Democrat and republican don’t agree. That’s why it’s taking so long, they’re actually doing the stuff trump syndicate is complaining they’re not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...