Jump to content

FBI reopens Clinton email investigation


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

This is ABOUT the  FBI director.  Dude has no clue what's on these emails. Food recipes,  homework assignments,  GOP ho-hum as usual,  or more GOP hoe -hum? I'm sstill waiting for all the BISD administrators who were gonna be going to jail  and... ooops, that's for another thread

He said he didn't have any idea what is on the emails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize the fifth amendment is a right we all have.  I also realize that you take it to avoid incriminating yourself.  Don't know how many have taken the fifth during this investigation, but quite a few.  The one drawback to the fifth is that it hampers investigators from getting to the truth.  Legally, we have to live with that.  That being said, how many of you think there was absolutely, positively, nothing illegal going on, when you have so many people taking the fifth?  And if so, why are so many using that right?

To put it in our terms, there's so much smoke, there has to be a fire.  Now, if someone can show the fallacy on my post, please do so.  I'm willing to learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, REBgp said:

I realize the fifth amendment is a right we all have.  I also realize that you take it to avoid incriminating yourself.  Don't know how many have taken the fifth during this investigation, but quite a few.  The one drawback to the fifth is that it hampers investigators from getting to the truth.  Legally, we have to live with that.  That being said, how many of you think there was absolutely, positively, nothing illegal going on, when you have so many people taking the fifth?  And if so, why are so many using that right?

To put it in our terms, there's so much smoke, there has to be a fire.  Now, if someone can show the fallacy on my post, please do so.  I'm willing to learn.

Great post REB, as always. Only thing I want to add is that pleading the 5th amendment is that you have the right not to incriminate yourself. It does not make you immune to prosecution. There are others who can incriminate you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, REBgp said:

I realize the fifth amendment is a right we all have.  I also realize that you take it to avoid incriminating yourself.  Don't know how many have taken the fifth during this investigation, but quite a few.  The one drawback to the fifth is that it hampers investigators from getting to the truth.  Legally, we have to live with that.  That being said, how many of you think there was absolutely, positively, nothing illegal going on, when you have so many people taking the fifth?  And if so, why are so many using that right?

To put it in our terms, there's so much smoke, there has to be a fire.  Now, if someone can show the fallacy on my post, please do so.  I'm willing to learn.

Big Girl, PamFam, and NewTobie and the now departed (RIP) EnlightenedChosenOne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Big Girl, PamFam, and NewTobie and the now departed (RIP) EnlightenedChosenOne.

Whoa, whoa, whoa...you can't lump PamFam into that group.  After all, he's said he doesn't like Hillary...he's just rubbing her perceptual lead in our faces every chance he gets.  Take that for what it's worth...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

Man, I hope you're wrong!  I hate to believe our moral compass in this country has eroded to the point that we'll elect a child predator as POTUS.  As a father of 3, this makes me ragey...

There are LOTS of folks that will vote for her no matter what...we've got some on this forum.

I feel you...can't understand the loyalty, especially when she has done NOTHING to deserve it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

There are LOTS of folks that will vote for her no matter what...we've got some on this forum.

I feel you...can't understand the loyalty, especially when she has done NOTHING to deserve it.

It's not the loyalty issue- it's the "mean things" he said to a few people.  They have been indoctrinated to believe that this is the important issue, dishonestly and criminality be damned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it even possible that she is part of this election?  LEGALLY????? 

Someone with greater knowledge of the law/legal system/running for office......how does that work.

In my opinion someone with these claims should not be allowed to even participate in election for the highest office in this country and possible the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Will probably be released by the Democrats come September.  Sound familiar?
    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...