Jump to content

Elijah Parquet (West Brook 2018)


Recommended Posts

On 5/5/2016 at 4:12 PM, BLUEDOVE3 said:

It does not make a difference if you play for your father. It's all about residency. A former Ozen player went to play for his father in Houston and wasn't allowed to play varsity his JUNIOR year.

Thanks for the clarity on this...I just figured that the kid would be allowed to move as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Barney Fife said:

Thanks for the clarity on this...I just figured that the kid would be allowed to move as well.

That's because you are thinking about it logically.   You would think if a kid's parent took a job coaching at a school, he would be allowed to play there.  After all, schools allow an exception to the residency requirement in such instances for a teacher's children to attend.  But we are talking about the UIL here.  Logic is not always present in these rules. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

That's because you are thinking about it logically.   You would think if a kid's parent took a job coaching at a school, he would be allowed to play there.  After all, schools allow an exception to the residency requirement in such instances for a teacher's children to attend.  But we are talking about the UIL here.  Logic is not always present in these rules. 

I was a coach's son that attended a school out of zone for all four of my high school years, and my dad and I had to go before the district committee EVERY year, because the same two coaches (one was from my zoned school) complained EVERY year. It became a running joke after my sophomore year, because it became the shortest DEC committee meeting in the history of DEC meetings those last two years! Waste of time. But its perfectly legal for a kid to play where his father (or mother) is employed no matter where that may be in relation to the residence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Dick Vitale said:

I was a coach's son that attended a school out of zone for all four of my high school years, and my dad and I had to go before the district committee EVERY year, because the same two coaches (one was from my zoned school) complained EVERY year. It became a running joke after my sophomore year, because it became the shortest DEC committee meeting in the history of DEC meetings those last two years! Waste of time. But its perfectly legal for a kid to play where his father (or mother) is employed no matter where that may be in relation to the residence.

Well in the case stated above he didnt get to play dickie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Dick Vitale said:

That's because he was not the custodial parent and the student resided with his mother....Big difference.

And because his father didnt live in the schools zone his residency was in Fort Bend had he been living in the North Shore zone he wouldve been able to play ..hadn't established a year of residency which is why he had to play JV..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, BlkMamba24 said:

And because his father didnt live in the schools zone his residency was in Fort Bend had he been living in the North Shore zone he wouldve been able to play ..hadn't established a year of residency which is why he had to play JV..

Yep!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Wait a minute!! UIL stared these rules because those little hick country schools were not playing by the rules. Show me an inner city school misusing the rules back in the 30's Nash.

Only if you show me the "hick country schools" doing the same in the 30s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Wait a minute!! UIL stared these rules because those little hick country schools were not playing by the rules. Show me an inner city school misusing the rules back in the 30's Nash.

30s??  I knew Dove and Nash were old but I had no idea THAT old!  Off topic - was it a lot harder to shoot the ball through a peach basket than today's rims and nets?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎5‎/‎6‎/‎2016 at 10:15 AM, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Not sure if anyone is comparing but me personally, all I am saying is that Ozen provided a well-rounded academic program for my kids.

You could...but not for long lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
    • @CardinalBacker   Wanted to get your thoughts on how Cohen did as Bragg's star witness..... My Take: The State spent two days acknowledging that Cohen lied all the time but now he has come clean,,,,,,,it took the defense (having same evidence state had), just a few hours to confirm Cohen lied to the current jury a couple days ago......  While I thought initially Trump would be found guilty due to venue, with best case a hung jury, there is now a pretty good chance he will be acquitted...... Thoughts anyone??   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • I can only imagine what you over heard. With most of that group there’s no telling. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...