Leaderboard

When this decision is finally addressed it will be 6-2. Justice Jackson will have to excuse herself as she can’t even define what a woman is… Citizenship would be way out of her (it?) league.

OUCH! We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary. Justice Barrett in Majority Opinion [Hidden Content]

They bring things upon themselves and then don’t understand why. victim mentality

SCOTUS has made a ruling about this case. No more lower court universal injunctions. It has a bearing on birthright citizenship as it only applies to those who brought the suit. It doesn’t block Trump’s EO about negating birthright citizenship. This is HUGE! Sounds like a class action lawsuit will have to be pursued. Very difficult. Makes it ‘seem’ SCOTUS is going back to the original intent of the 14th which applied to former slaves.

Hamshire-Fannett (3-0) Hamshire-Fannett 33, Little River-Academy 14 Hamshire-Fannett 33, Lamesa 20 Hamshire-Fannett 35, Kingsville 6 Bracket play Fri 8:45am vs Hitchcock Hardin-Jefferson (1-2) Benbrook 36, Hardin-Jefferson 12 West 19, Hardin-Jefferson 13 Hardin-Jefferson 27, Port Isabel 18 Bracket play Fri 8:45am vs Mineral Wells Kountze (0-3) Junction 20, Kountze 13 Hearne 19, Kountze 6 East Bernard 33, Kountze 18 Bracket play Fri 8:00am vs Tioga

Today, the Supreme Court made a ruling that appears to permanently end what has become too commonplace lately, universal or nationwide injunctions. In the last couple of decades, it has become an issue with federal district judges issuing a ruling in court that stopped a nationwide law or presidential executive order. Federal district judges are the federal equivalent of a county felony judge in Texas. If you get indicted for a felony in Jefferson County, for example, you will go to trial in one of the three felony courts in Jefferson County in Beaumont. The district judge’s authority deals with a motion or a trial in front of that judge. The district judge is not an appeals court level but the trial court level. The Supreme Court just issued a ruling that the universal (nationwide) injunction was beyond the authority of the federal district judges. So when Trump or any future president issues an executive order or the DOJ tries to enforce a federal law, one of the trial court level federal district judges can’t with the stroke of a pen end the order or the law. The case is Trump v. Casa about birthright citizenship. The ruling today has nothing to do with that case which still has to be hurt. What it seem to do was to stop the federal district judges for putting a nationwide halt to executive orders. It seems like this has been brewing for a long time and the Supreme Court finally stepped in. Also Justice Amy Coney Barrett blasted Justice Brown Jackson who dissented in the ruling. Her comment was that Brown Jackson: “Decries an imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary”.

Actually a good point! [Hidden Content]

Just going off of HF X account.

I’m heading out for Goobers & popcorn in a little bit.

This is going to be fun to watch......

Overshadowed by SCOTUS ruling now.

Lets see if the media pays as much attention to the deal as they did when Trump laid out the tariff's

Britain is in a bad way.

GE is multi-faceted. They are into oil and gas too. I did not know China bought the appliance division. I have a GE mini fridge that is 30 years old and still running strong. Keeps my drinks nice and cold.

Always the best games when one swing of the bat can be the difference between winning and losing…..every inning.

Won't hear a peep from him while they are winning. But let them lose 3-4 in a row and he will come out of the cracks like cockroaches. This was an impressive sweep of one of the hottest teams in baseball. Pitching was outstanding!!

[Hidden Content]

How will you be classified as citizen without birthright citizenship?