Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/11/2023 in all areas
-
MAGA
5GallonBucket and one other reacted to LumRaiderFan for a topic
The 81 million that voted for biden are like your sister's kids, they don't know the difference between the real world and a board game...but thank you for the fence straddling non-answer. At least you're consistent, you've assured us that DeSantis is a shoe-in but you're already making way for you being wrong...again.2 points -
MAGA
5GallonBucket and one other reacted to SmashMouth for a topic
Biden says it means: "Make Amer...animal...amoshinalo...merica...grazing... You know! The thing!2 points -
Political Memes
LumRaiderFan and one other reacted to Unwoke for a topic
A Country Boy Can Survive. 😎2 points -
TGCA Softball Rankings
Separation Scientist and one other reacted to WOSdrummer99 for a topic
April 10 Rankings [Hidden Content] Class 1A/2A = #12 Colmesneil 15-2 Class 4A ^ 3 #18 Liberty 21-7 v 3 #21 Hamshire-Fannett 18-7-1 Class 5A = #5 Barbers Hill 27-22 points -
MAGA
SmashMouth reacted to LumRaiderFan for a topic
CB respond without referencing Trump? Not sure that’s possible.1 point -
MAGA
LumRaiderFan reacted to SmashMouth for a topic
I don't know why you're defending Sleepy Joe. I didn't mention Trump one time. The last time I mentioned Trump, I said I wish he wouldn't run because he would lose. So please tell me that you agree (without referencing Trump or deflecting somehow) that Joe Biden is a freakin' idiot. Please give me some hope for humanity and all that is good. Lol.1 point -
Local Murders
tvc184 reacted to CardinalBacker for a topic
What could all of these shooters have in common? It seems like it would be obvious, but I just can't tell what it is about all of this violent crime that seems to be uniform. Well, maybe we can get to that one day. In the meantime we need to focus on stamping out systemic racism, abortion, and microaggressions via mis-gendered pronouns. It's not going to go away unless people can actually describe what's going on.1 point -
This Is Who Chicago's New Mayor Says Should Respond to Crime Scenes!
LumRaiderFan reacted to baddog for a topic
Can you see violence interrupters talking the bank mass murderer into giving up? He exchanged fire with police and would have gunned the social workers down too. You’re right, what a joke.1 point -
25-2A West Hardin. 8-0 Big Sandy. 8-0 Deweyville. 8-0 Evadale. 4-4 Sabine Pass. 2-6 Hull-Daisetta. 0-8 High Island(1A) 1-6 Spurger(1A) 0-7 High Island and Spurger will play Wednesday1 point
-
22-3A District Standings 4/11/23 W L Orangefield Bobcats 9 0 Buna Cougars 7 1 Kountze Lions 4 4 Hardin Hornets 4 4 Anahuac Panthers 4 4 Warren Warriors 3 5 Kirbyville Wildcats 2 6 East Chambers Buccaneers 0 91 point
-
How ‘bout them Yellowjackets!!!! Chester is quietly having a great season! Keep it rolling boys.1 point
-
1 point
-
Law Trivia and Discussions
SmashMouth reacted to tvc184 for a topic
The officer told me that the DA accepted manslaughter charges against both DWI drivers. I have no idea about the outcomes. Nothing in the law (obviously) goes by, it just seems reasonable or emotionally we feel that more people should be responsible. Anybody that looks at Facebook could look at any new stories and you could almost count the seconds sticking by before somebody will say, well a parent should be charged also or neighbor who knew about it should be charged or blah, blah blah. To do so there has to be a specific law allowing it. The state cannot do it, just because. I gave my cheat sheet law on Causation a couple of comments back. That is the law in the situation that allows such prosecutions. Sec. 6.04. CAUSATION: CONDUCT AND RESULTS. (a) A person is criminally responsible if the result would not have occurred but for his conduct, operating either alone or concurrently with another cause, unless the concurrent cause was clearly sufficient to produce the result and the conduct of the actor clearly insufficient. (b) A person is nevertheless criminally responsible for causing a result if the only difference between what actually occurred and what he desired, contemplated, or risked is that: (1) a different offense was committed; or (2) a different person or property was injured, harmed, or otherwise affected. We can see in (a) that a person can be charged, even with a concurrent cause that he didn’t create. It would not have occurred without his conduct. so in the case of the second car that ran over the guy, would the victim have died had that second driver not run the red light while intoxicated? Seemingly the obvious answer is no. Had the second guy not run the red light, the victim, most likely would not be dead. Then let’s take the first driver. He almost certainly did not kill the victim but had it not been for his drunk driving actions but n knocking the victim into the road, would the victim have died? Again, the answer is almost certainly no. Of course a lawyer can try to argue the point and that’s what lawyers do. The point is though that there is a law in place that says if your conduct causes a result, even if it’s with another cause, you might be criminally liable.1 point -
Law Trivia and Discussions
SmashMouth reacted to WOSdrummer99 for a topic
I-10, I'mma win if I make it back (uh!) Gotta take it slow, through that Anahuac (Anahuac!) The laws colder than an icicle (icicle) Uh! And mine sour as a diced pickle -Chad Butler1 point -
Political Memes
LumRaiderFan reacted to Unwoke for a topic
I don’t care for Jon Stewart too much but this is pretty funny.1 point -
Law Trivia and Discussions
SmashMouth reacted to LumRaiderFan for a topic
I would think both drunk drivers would be charged, not sure why one would be less guilty than the other, but I can see the point SM made where drunk #1 set it in motion and may be guilty for actually causing the death. I will have to add that that is the worst bad luck I have ever heard of.1 point -
1 point
-
Junior Lofton goes for 42 & 14 a day or two after signing a 4 year/$7m deal with Memphis. Memphis had to sign him to a regular contract (instead of the 2 way/g league deal) in order to be able to use him for the playoffs (and Steven Adams is out for the year). The Griz only played 6 guys, but I still have to wonder if he got that opportunity before they signed him to the deal, how that would have affected his contract. Gotta think it would be at least double. Still, huge day for Junior and a great opportunity for him going forward.1 point
-
Podcast?
Dirty_but_Dazzling reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity for a topic
Let's go. Also I hope all you had a nice Easter.1 point -
1 point