All Activity

The deal might as well be written on toilet paper because they will violate it you can bank on it. As for as bombing them that might trigger them closing off the strait again but as you’ve said other countries are looking for other alternatives for their oil but it would still hurt the global economy imo. We should have been all in from the beginning to take out the oppressive regime and secure the uranium or not go in at all imo. Trump ran his piehole too much and Iran called his bluff. What a mess.

The deal might as well be written on toilet paper because they will violate it you can bank on it. As for as bombing them that might trigger them closing off the strait again but as you’ve said other countries are looking for other alternatives for their oil but it would still hurt the global economy imo. We should have been all in from the beginning to take out the oppressive regime and secure the uranium or not go in at all imo. Trump ran his piehole too much and Iran called his bluff. What a mess.

That is what happened

Newton scores then got the 2pt… Franklin next possession was a strip fumble returned for td to make it a 14 point game

I’m amazed at all the criticisms/kudos for an agreement that doesn’t yet exist…

You knew it would see-saw hard & fast. I can’t recall an IPO in a long time that didn’t lose 50% of its value in the first year. Many have come back strong and stayed strong. You didn’t mention E*TRADE. That makes a difference on fees. Still the same for tax purposes. SpaceX is so different than other firms, I see it as more of a trade stock versus an investment stock for the shorter term. Long play, I think it definitely has legs. But, the mere nature of its business is high risk. Too risky for my taste as I’m already living on savings and investments. I was also worried about it being so dependent on the government and whatever Administration was in at the time. When reading the prospectus, 20% of it’s business was with the Feds.

That's the thing, right? It wouldn't matter what the outcome was, what was in the MOU, none of it. TDS sufferers would still parrot the same MSM talking points and say how terrible it was. Their entire platform is Trump bad...that's it. It's why their entire party is being taking over by the DSA and far left radicals. The mid-terms will be the judge.

This war had been waging for decades. To say that Trump “started” it is simply finger pointing. I’m shocked.

That option was not negotiated. Bombing is an option that always exists. Why wouldn’t they live up to the agreement? It’s basically the sane one they had. I would have approved of him never starting this fiasco.

It is roller coasting....down to $176.00 today. I plan on holding on to my few shares....lol If I didn't mention it, this is a small E*TRADE account I play in

DISTRICT 32 12YR OLD ALLSTAR GAMES June 18th Winners Bracket Port Neches @ Groves, 7pm Nederland @ B.C., 7pm Elimination Bracket H.F. @ Vidor, 7pm Orange- Bye

Not surprising..... There would of been absolutely nothing he could of done that you would approved of. That's OK though - no money from US is being given to them, and if they don't live up to agreement, we have option to go back to bombing......

DISTRICT 32 12YR OLD ALLSTAR GAME SCORES June 17th Groves- 4 Vidor- 2 Port Neches- 6 H.F.- 2 Nederland- 12 Orange- 0

Could be Newton scored 7 pt. or 8 pts, Then picked up a fumble or intersected a pass and run it back for another score.

President Surrender squealed “calf rope” to the country he claimed three months ago he would accept only “unconditional surrender” from. This is the most embarrassing foreign policy blunder in American History. Not to mention costly. Get their oil back flowing. Give them their money back, à la Obama. Kick in $300 billion more to help them rebuild what we destroyed. Fix everything back the way it was before it started. The nuclear weapons agreement is even less stringent in wording than the Obama/Kerry deal. Not winning. Humiliating defeat.

Babins + BH vs Woodville? My money is on Babin'sHill.

I agree with this statement and have been saying this for many years. The UIL has no idea what is about to him them in the next 5-10 years. Not everyone is playing by the same set of rules. At some point we have to stop with the non-sense about controlling where we send our kids to school and whether or not its for "athletic purposes". Well NO JOKE every single transfer in the history of transfers is for athletic purposes so they can learn to adapt or get left behind as more options become available. I too believe you will start to see committed seniors opt out of their UIL ISD senior year and take the road that better suits their career path.

I believe it depends on the recruit's status. Borderline prospects, playing definitely helps, but big-time recruits are often well offered before their senior year. I can envision where more 4-star plus athletes opt to sit their senior year, especially if they are on a mediocre team. I also believe some colleges will encourage this (even though the won't admit it) with the amount of NIL money some these kids stay to make. I can also more this happening more with UIL restricting transfers for "athletic purposes" and good private schools offering them to play. It's going to be a tough battle for schools and high school coaches to convince kids to compete once they get offers from preferred universities, worse if they decide to transfer and get denied by UIL.

At this stage in my life, I'm not really a growth investor any more. I'm more of a value/income/dividend player. But, if I had another 20 years where I really wanted a good growth stock, and SPCX dipped down to $115-$120/share, it would definitely be on my buy list.

Definitely tone deaf.

Still to early to decide if this effort was a success or failure. That won't be known until the formal agreement is signed at least a couple months from now. If there really are snap inspections and full access by IAEA, and IAEA supervises dilution of current material, it could be deemed successful from the nuclear threat aspect. I also still say, the Strait--thus Iran--has lost it's bargaining power for the future. Supply chains will no longer rely so much on passage through the Strait for the bulk of their needs. This is an outcome that wasn't discussed as a goal. It's an unintended consequence. But, it's a definite positive for the U.S. The Administration lucked out, and backed into this one.

And you’re the one who cried about personal attacks. That’s all you do. Smoaky would be proud. You’re just part of the hypocrite cult. Got it.

MAGA and bots 😂 Real conservatives and the rest of the world shaking their heads I honestly feel bad for Reagan, biggest man crush on sleepy Donald that I've ever seen.. dude foams at the mouth daily to talk about him.. he/she has that defend by all means mantra lol