Jump to content

House Passes Laken Riley Act – 170 America-Hating Democrats Vote Against Bill!!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

Just now, SmashMouth said:

"Psychologists suggest trying to find compassion for that antagonistic narcissist . After all, through their negative behavior, they are shielding their threatened ego with their insistence on always being right."

I'm sorry @Englebert

Are you really resorting to playing armchair psychologist. You just keep digging that embarrassment hole deeper and deeper. Seriously, what is wrong with you? Do you really want to pursue a path in which you obviously have no comprehension.

I really had no intention of letting you embarrass yourself. This is just getting ridiculous. I'll wait for CardinalBackers rebuttal instead of being the catalyst to your "clinical embarrassment". (I'll save you some research time and let you know that disorder does not really exist.) As much as you post on here, I really thought you had a bigger spine. CardinalBacker can dish it out, and can take it too. You, not so much. For wanting to be the morality police, you sure do exhibit a clear lack of morality. I suggest you spend more time in the psychologist's flat bed instead of the arm chair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a friend text me a little while back, predicting that this thread would go to page 6 before 4:30pm today. I told her no way. Boy was I wrong.

Ha ha. I must be lying. I'm never wrong. At least that is what my last armchair psychologist told me. Should I continue seeing that psychologist or just emulate Trump and emphatically say "You're fired!"

That was fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Englebert said:

I had a friend text me a little while back, predicting that this thread would go to page 6 before 4:30pm today. I told her no way. Boy was I wrong.

Ha ha. I must be lying. I'm never wrong. At least that is what my last armchair psychologist told me. Should I continue seeing that psychologist or just emulate Trump and emphatically say "You're fired!"

That was fun.

You're re right. I'm sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SmashMouth said:

It's not the same thing. And even if it was (which it's not), then why are we asking for Trump to get off just because Biden did? Why aren't we asking why both should have to face consequences? Why do we keep putting our politicians on a pedestal & above the law?

Both Trump and Biden did what most Presidents have done, with no nefarious intent, I will add.

None have received the treatment from Democrats and the media like Trump has for doing the same thing other Presidents have done.

Whether you like the guy or not, and I’m not a fan of the man, the constant charges, impeachments and general coverage is something that should be an embarrassment to this country, all while many ignore the vegetable in the White House.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Both Trump and Biden did what most Presidents have done, with no nefarious intent, I will add.

None have received the treatment from Democrats and the media like Trump has for doing the same thing other Presidents have done.

Whether you like the guy or not, and I’m not a fan of the man, the constant charges, impeachments and general coverage is something that should be an embarrassment to this country, all while many ignore the vegetable in the White House.

 

Agree 100%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Both Trump and Biden did what most Presidents have done, with no nefarious intent, I will add.

None have received the treatment from Democrats and the media like Trump has for doing the same thing other Presidents have done.

Whether you like the guy or not, and I’m not a fan of the man, the constant charges, impeachments and general coverage is something that should be an embarrassment to this country, all while many ignore the vegetable in the White House.

 

Vegetable…..lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/15/2024 at 1:16 PM, Englebert said:

Are you really resorting to playing armchair psychologist. You just keep digging that embarrassment hole deeper and deeper. Seriously, what is wrong with you? Do you really want to pursue a path in which you obviously have no comprehension.

I really had no intention of letting you embarrass yourself. This is just getting ridiculous. I'll wait for CardinalBackers rebuttal instead of being the catalyst to your "clinical embarrassment". (I'll save you some research time and let you know that disorder does not really exist.) As much as you post on here, I really thought you had a bigger spine. CardinalBacker can dish it out, and can take it too. You, not so much. For wanting to be the morality police, you sure do exhibit a clear lack of morality. I suggest you spend more time in the psychologist's flat bed instead of the arm chair.

What disorder doesn't exist?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2024 at 12:43 PM, thetragichippy said:

LOL......You are ate up with CNN talking points. No one, unless evil is OK with babies starving to death. One could make an argument that someone who has 1 or more babies but can't afford food for them without government assistance is "OK with babies starving".  The rest of your comments is nonsense too, but I'm not wasting time addressing it. 

So, do you support entitlement programs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/15/2024 at 8:26 AM, Englebert said:

More lies, and accusing me of lies. How long will you embarrass yourself.

Obama weaponized the IRS against Conservatives. He spied on Fox News (and AP) reporters. Are you denying these facts? I'm sure he probably had something to do with Hillary's "Russia, Russia, Russia" dossier. No telling what else was done. Biden has a new attack almost daily. You even admitted it. So try to disprove these. And for bonus points, start listing those Trump political persecutions being done to Democrats. Maybe there are some. Otherwise, let's see if you must consider calling yourself a liar.

Trump did not run on "Lock her up". It was a saying at his rallies that caught on. He did not go after her because it was against form and fashion to go after your political foes. Do you remember when Conservative had character? I wish he would have had her investigated. She would be rotting in prison right now...where she belongs.

Trump fought against the spending bills given to him. He even shut down the government because of it. Do you remember that? Can't you get anything right?

Again, you are horrible at revising history to fit your TDS filled criteria. You have proven that you cannot analyze other people. It is laughable when you try. And yes, you should feel physically hurt when you are this stupid...if you had character.

What lies will you reply with now? Maybe get Big Girl to help you because you are doing a terrible job on your own.

 

Show me your source?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

I already paid for your education. Now you expect me to do your research too?

The information is readily available.

Yeah right. I make more than you. Your little pennies mean nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Big girl said:

Yeah right. I make more than you. Your little pennies mean nothing.

Then do your own damn research instead of asking us peons to wait on you hand and foot. Or is it you are just incapable of such a mundane task?

And please explain how you think you know how much I make? Are you a trained profiler or just a pathetic stereotyper? Is there a difference?

Instead of answering those questions, please, just answer the pertinent question that everyone on this board is thinking: What makes you feel qualified to inject yourself into topics that are clearly beyond your comprehension? Did someone once tell you that you were "smart"? Would a smart person brag about how much they make after admitting they couldn't pay off their own debts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Answer my question.

I don't know how to dumb it down so far that you could comprehend. Feel fortunate that you don't have to concern yourself with Middle School issues. You might achieve that level one day, but please don't pay someone to teach you. I don't want to have to pay off another one of your loans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Englebert said:

Then do your own damn research instead of asking us peons to wait on you hand and foot. Or is it you are just incapable of such a mundane task?

And please explain how you think you know how much I make? Are you a trained profiler or just a pathetic stereotyper? Is there a difference?

Instead of answering those questions, please, just answer the pertinent question that everyone on this board is thinking: What makes you feel qualified to inject yourself into topics that are clearly beyond your comprehension? Did someone once tell you that you were "smart"? Would a smart person brag about how much they make after admitting they couldn't pay off their own debts?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You sound big mad.Couldn't? I most definitely could, I received an email saying that my loans were forgiven from my service provider.. I didn't ask or fill out any paperwork. The government backed the loan and said I had paid enough, too much. Again, pennies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Big girl said:

You sound big mad.Couldn't? Nope, I received an email saying that my loans were forgiven from my service provider.. I didn't ask or fill out any paperwork. The government backed the loan and said I had paid enough, too much. Again, pennies.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • tvc184 locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NEWton86
    Newest Member
    NEWton86
    Joined



  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   I wish the Ohio AG much success...from the article: Ohio’s Republican Attorney General is pushing back against critics after warning that anti-Israel protesters wearing masks are facing potential prison time due to a little known state law. "The First Amendment protects you and saying whatever it is you have to say. Even hateful things are protected by the First Amendment," Ohio AG Dave Yost told Fox News Digital this week. "The First Amendment, though, was always designed to be a shield against the government. It's not a sword against your fellow students and they have rights too. Your First Amendment rights are limited by their right to be able to go to school, use the library, get the value of their education and the tuition that they paid for." In a letter sent on Monday, Yost warned university presidents of a historic state law that could mean masked anti-Israel demonstrators on college campuses could face felony charges.  "The law is an old law," Yost told Fox News Digital. "It goes back to the 20th century, and it was originally designed to make sure that people like Ku Klux Klan were held accountable, that, of course, the reason that the Ku Klux Klan wore hoods and masks over their faces is so that they couldn't be identified because they were committing crimes. So the General Assembly in Ohio said, okay, you can wear a mask, you can wear a hood, that's fine. But if you commit a crime with two or more other people, while you are masking yourself, we're going to see that as a heightened kind of crime, a worse kind of thing, because you're consciously doing this and trying to hide your identity because you know you're doing something wrong."
    • You keep pointing at the fact that Biden got so many votes as proof of cheating, when it’s actually proof of something else… Trump motivates people to get off of the couch, register, and vote for ANYBODY BUT TRUMP.  And instead of looking in the mirror and recognizing that the problem is you (the person who nominates a candidate that most people HATE) you blame the people who vote against him.    Haley pulled down 22% of the votes in the most recent Republican  primary. Those votes were cast AFTER she’d already dropped out of the race.    Trump is going to lose the fourth consecutive election cycle since he beat the even more unlikable Hillary in  2016. The Dems learned from their mistake (nominating a despised candidate in ‘16). The Rs keep nominating the same guy that most people hate and expecting different results.    Dems roll in November. 
    • Not yet, anyway. If you can't see that there has been a strong effort to create gender dysphoria amongst young folks AND try to keep it from parents in many instances, you're not paying attention. You may not care about this, but it's ridiculous to ridicule those that do. There is an agenda behind this, no doubt about it, like bullets pointed out earlier, it's just a name change...for now. And it was only very recently that girls were allowed to join the "boy scouts", they have been allowed to join certain other groups that weren't available to girls at the time. It's the frog in the slow boil.
    • Bullard 10  LCM - 4  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...