Jump to content

JoeBama's Plausible Future!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

With everything I seen so far concerning JoeBama and his future, the following makes more sense than anything else I've seen:  What I think JoeBama is going to do is in the spring he'll announce that he's not running for reelection.  The last sitting President to do it was L. Johnson on March 31, 1968.  And we all know that Nixon, the come back kid, won.  Trump would mirror that!  Although the Dems like to say they are the "quota" party, I don't think he'll resign so they Dems can say that they have first black female President.  They know she's worst than JoeBama.  They put her on the ticket as an impeachment proof insurance policy.  You could be looking at a Trump 50 State win.  If this scenario, not running for reelection, plays out, thoughts on who would be the Dem nominee?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Separation Scientist said:

Trump will never win all 50 states. Ever. The evil, mentally ill people in places like NY, NJ, CA, IL, would literally vote for Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussain, or Kim Jong Un over Trump. Their derangement and hate for Trump is unlimited.  

What's your thought on my thought of JoeBama announcing in the Spring that he will not run for reelection?

@thetragichippy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Reagan said:

What's your thought on my thought of JoeBama announcing in the Spring that he will not run for reelection?

@thetragichippy

I don't see a graceful way for him to bow out.  I'm not sure how they insert someone other than Kamala. I believe Kamala will be easier to beat than Joe.....She has absolutely done a horrible job as VP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2024 at 12:51 AM, Reagan said:

With everything I seen so far concerning JoeBama and his future, the following makes more sense than anything else I've seen:  What I think JoeBama is going to do is in the spring he'll announce that he's not running for reelection.  The last sitting President to do it was L. Johnson on March 31, 1968.  And we all know that Nixon, the come back kid, won.  Trump would mirror that!  Although the Dems like to say they are the "quota" party, I don't think he'll resign so they Dems can say that they have first black female President.  They know she's worst than JoeBama.  They put her on the ticket as an impeachment proof insurance policy.  You could be looking at a Trump 50 State win.  If this scenario, not running for reelection, plays out, thoughts on who would be the Dem nominee?  

Can’t see that happening (with Kamala). If they do a bait and switch, I think it will be Newsome.  Kills two birds because they have to dump Harris in doing so (can’t have running mates from the same state).  I thought that would be the play all along but getting pretty late in the game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Can’t see that happening (with Kamala). If they do a bait and switch, I think it will be Newsome.  Kills two birds because they have to dump Harris in doing so (can’t have running mates from the same state).  I thought that would be the play all along but getting pretty late in the game. 

I spoke about that in the other threads. If they are going to make a change, it has to be pretty quick now.

Like LBJ in ‘68, Biden will have to suspend his campaign since he is already running and gotten most of the primary/caucus votes. Like LBJ, Biden’s approval rating is horrendous.

 Unlike LBJ who I believe shocked the electorate, Biden bowing out will not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, TxHoops said:

Can’t see that happening (with Kamala). If they do a bait and switch, I think it will be Newsome.  Kills two birds because they have to dump Harris in doing so (can’t have running mates from the same state).  I thought that would be the play all along but getting pretty late in the game. 

I think another Biden term would be more survivable than Newsom. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another possible scenario:  JoeBama stays in the race.  If, and that's a big if, he wins, then within a short amount of time he resigns and then goofy VP becomes President.  Knowing, again, how quota's are more important than anything else to the Dems, with the exception of illegal aliens, this is their best case scenario.  

PS -- Did anyone see where a Dem Senator from Connecticut said that illegal aliens are more important then anything?!  SMH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Reagan said:

Another possible scenario:  JoeBama stays in the race.  If, and that's a big if, he wins, then within a short amount of time he resigns and then goofy VP becomes President.  Knowing, again, how quota's are more important than anything else to the Dems, with the exception of illegal aliens, this is their best case scenario.  

PS -- Did anyone see where a Dem Senator from Connecticut said that illegal aliens are more important then anything?!  SMH!

If they want Harris, why not Biden back out and give his delegates to her? At least she could potentially make up some ground from the negative ratings for her and Biden based on demographics. Let’s face it, Biden isn’t going to pull any extra votes based on sex, race, age, state, etc. If they think Harris is the future, I think she may have a better chance than Biden. She can pull some numbers from sex, race and age just from people who like identity politics and to check off boxes.

 This is not a prediction but simply wondering if she might do better than him if he gets any worse. Harris standing alone might get her the glass ceiling female/minority quicker than tagging onto his cocktails.

 What do you think? I and plenty of others said the exact same thing about him resigning right after the election, in the last election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, tvc184 said:

If they want Harris, why not Biden back out and give his delegates to her? At least she could potentially make up some ground from the negative ratings for her and Biden based on demographics. Let’s face it, Biden isn’t going to pull any extra votes based on sex, race, age, state, etc. If they think Harris is the future, I think she may have a better chance than Biden. She can pull some numbers from sex, race and age just from people who like identity politics and to check off boxes.

 This is not a prediction but simply wondering if she might do better than him if he gets any worse. Harris standing alone might get her the glass ceiling female/minority quicker than tagging onto his cocktails.

 What do you think? I and plenty of others said the exact same thing about him resigning right after the election, in the last election.

Nothing to back this up, but I think Biden would have a better chance at the polls than Cackling Kamala. I expect he can hold on for the next 9 months. If he wins, he can always step down then, if the democrats are wanting to crown Kamala.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Nothing to back this up, but I think Biden would have a better chance at the polls than Cackling Kamala. I expect he can hold on for the next 9 months. If he wins, he can always step down then, if the democrats are wanting to crown Kamala.

That brings up two points in my mind.

1.  It kind of cancels the, “we can’t disregard a minority” if it’s obvious by the internal polls that Biden will poll better or for that matter, anyone else such as Gavin Newsom. 

2. I think her demographics and gaining votes based on that cancels #1.

Let’s face it, if it’s two old white guys running, many people will not be inspired and will stay home. If it is any kind of minority whether by race, sex, age, ethnicity, sexual preference status and so on, it can guarantee that a percentage of people who might not really care about voting will all of a sudden be galvanized to vote. It doesn’t have to be much to change the election.

Remember that it doesn’t matter who is more popular, it matters who shows up on Election Day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...