Jump to content

Lumberton at LCM


RaiderGirl22

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

That’s because nobody thinks LCM is gonna win. Let them sneak up and surprise the Raiders, and all hell is gonna break loose. 

Damn right, the whole UIL office will be up to LCM that following Monday morning after several phone calls from a certain Lumberwood fan up-n-arms about it. 😁 

 

BOJO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

The Slumberton moniker doesn’t make sense though with all the nice neighborhoods and expensive homes etc. (kinda like parts of Little Cypress). It’s nowhere near a slum. Now if we’re talking Silsbee… 😎

Silsbee is where its at. Trust me the Raiders dont want any part of the Tigers. We have been calling them since the 90’s yall didnt have those neighborhoods. Just swinger i mean boykin back then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

Silsbee is where its at. Trust me the Raiders dont want any part of the Tigers. We have been calling them since the 90’s yall didnt have those neighborhoods. Just swinger i mean boykin back then

Didn’t even have Boykin yet when I was a kid. Still couldn’t drive down the freeway and see tractor parts in the yard in Lumberton back then. Those same tractor parts are still in the same yards driving up Highway 92. Lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Didn’t even have Boykin yet when I was a kid. Still couldn’t drive down the freeway and see tractor parts in the yard in Lumberton back then. Those same tractor parts are still in the same yards driving up Highway 92. Lol.

Thats something about Silsbee. They dont want to sell their land or get bigger imo. Which im fine with that. Ive lived in Lumberton twice and regretted it both times

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,972
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • No worries. My thing is this. Trump was badly flawed. We knew it going into 2016. As an incumbent, there really wasn’t much of a chance to nominate a different candidate in 2020. But after all that happened during Trump’s term, the election loss and fiasco that followed, and everything else that he’s been a part of since… we should have chosen a different nominee in 2024. That’s been my point all along, but that’s not what we did. His followers are very vocal and infect all levels of the Republican Party leadership-especially in local counties and precincts. Enough people decided that Trump is the only person who should be considered to be the eventual R candidate that he cruised to the nomination in spite of everything, purely based on the cult of personality, IMO.  All of the signs were there. Trump is in a dead heat with Biden and has been all along, while every other potential R candidate enjoyed double digit leads over Biden. Literally all we had to do is pick someone over Trump and they’d cruise to a win over Biden-but we’d rather lose with Trump than win with someone else.    Names like Gary Hart and John Edwards come to mind. Those guys were Dems with a small fraction of Trump’s baggage, but the party still dumped them and moved on… I can’t understand why the Rs have refused to self-police and choose someone with decency… who would also be able to win the popular vote. We (the Rs) should have made DJT an old memory… but force the Ds and independents to do it for us. 
    • Trump literally ran on locking up hillary... ppl seem to 4get that
    • Currently in a monsoon raining badly here in Lufkin game will start late 
    • I read your posts and agree on some things and disagree with some.  I guess my one question is (in your opinion) who should we vote for?  Third party candidates do not get elected.  Kennedy is only going to dilute votes which will benefit Democrats.  Write-in votes do not win elections and I’m not even sure they are counted in a presidential election.  Many people get on and express views and tell us what is wrong with X, but never give the answer for Y.  I am extremely sarcastic and passive-aggressive, but genuinely hope this post doesn’t come across that way.  Trump has my vote until someone persuades me otherwise (and I’m a Never Biden).  Had another R been nominated they would have had my vote.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...