Jump to content

Tatum @ Lumberton


RaiderGirl22

Who wins?  

34 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins?


This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 09/22/2023 at 11:00 PM

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

I saw that on Max Preps. I was hoping that @89Falcon could explain how a 1-3 record could be the reason that Tatum was surprising and should edge Lumberton. Plus I don’t trust MaxPreps W-L records. I heard one of the games was called due to lightning. 

Yeah that’s where I saw it. I should have said that when I posted that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

I saw that on Max Preps. I was hoping that @89Falcon could explain how a 1-3 record could be the reason that Tatum was surprising and should edge Lumberton. Plus I don’t trust MaxPreps W-L records. I heard one of the games was called due to lightning. 

They are not 1-3. Tatum lost to Center and Daingerfield. the Pitt game was called for weather with Tatum leading. Tatum then beat West Rusk. Center and DF would likely run Lumberton off the field and Tatum took them both to the wire. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 89Falcon said:

They are not 1-3. Tatum lost to Center and Daingerfield. the Pitt game was called for weather with Tatum leading. Tatum then beat West Rusk. Center and DF would likely run Lumberton off the field and Tatum took them both to the wire. 

It’s looks like they’re not afraid to give up a bunch of points, but they can score a lot too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tatum officially 1-2. Neither loss was really close. The win was worse than it was. Rushed for 480 on the night. Three 100+ yard rushers. Offense is still missing starting RB and I doubt he’ll see the field before district. 
 

Interesting see a play from the flex and the next from shotgun with 4-wide. QB makes this good. Y’all remember from last year. Also the guy that almost went for 300 against y’all. 
 

I think Lumberton will win. Just based off depth. We iron man down here in our A. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I'm going to agree with this. Individual drills would be fine, but a varsity baseball player should not be involved in full pad practices during the baseball season. Especially, if he is a contributing player on a playoff bound baseball team. This is irresponsible and selfish of the AD/HFC.
    • If there's a specific situation that started this thread, I don't know the details.  Nor do I care.  But I do have an opinion about what I'm gathering from some of the comments. My opinion: I do believe that an AD should leave the players of a particular sport to their respective head coach during that season.  The varsity players of that sport anyway.  I believe it's a little different concerning the sub varsity players of that sport.  If an AD/HFC decides to grab some JV baseball players for some offseason football stuff during the athletics period, I don't have AS MUCH of a problem with it.  I would still consider it a common courtesy to discuss with the head coach of that particular sport to consider their thoughts on it. I also believe that ALL athletes should be lifting and running all year.  When in a particular season, I believe that the head coach of that sport should control the reigns on that topic to implement some sport specific lifting/running during their season.  But all athletes should be in the weight room year round. As far as playing multiple sports?  I'm an advocate.  I know that the popular idea is for potentially good/great players in a specific sport to "focus" on that sport.  And I agree.. but focusing on one sport doesn't mean stopping the others.  It just means prioritizing time in a way that extra work is put into that specific sport.  After hours, weekends, holidays/summer, etc..  Just because you plan on making a push into college baseball (for example) doesn't mean you can't work on baseball during other sports seasons.  That's exactly what I did.. and countless others.  Plus, it's important to maybe learn how to be a role player in a sport that you're not the best at.  Because that's coming. That's my opinion.  And I come from an era where kids played multiple sports if they knew it would be helping.  Helping their classmates.. or just contributing to school pride.  I hate knowing that there are schools that could be much more competitive if their kids would just come out.  It's hard for me to understand if I'm being honest. 
    • I wasn't arguing the point of how an AD keeps his job. The question was "what has happened to Jasper" as in their whole athletic department. They were much much better in those other sports even when football was successful. Not anymore. Something definitely has changed.
    • I just don't think it's as big an issue as what's being discussed. My opinion.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...