Jump to content

Here's How Trump Beats the Georgia Indictment!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

On 8/24/2023 at 1:04 PM, Reagan said:

Jim Jordan launches probe into Georgia Trump prosecution!  Something needs to be done.  Trump and his lawyers didn't do anything wrong.  Just like in 2000, the Supreme Court is going to have to step in.  

This is the hidden content, please

Little Jimmy Jordan. Wannabe lawyer, sex offender defender (I ain’t talkin’ Trump, neither). He doesn’t care about justice. He’s just a water boy and he knows it.  Whatever happened to states’ rights?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/26/2023 at 12:06 PM, UT alum said:

Little Jimmy Jordan. Wannabe lawyer, sex offender defender (I ain’t talkin’ Trump, neither). He doesn’t care about justice. He’s just a water boy and he knows it.  Whatever happened to states’ rights?

Funny how you can convict a man because you know what he thinks. Nothing has been proven about what Jordan knew and YOU KNOW IT. Must make you feel good to spread vicious lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, baddog said:

Funny how you can convict a man because you know what he thinks. Nothing has been proven about what Jordan knew and YOU KNOW IT. Must make you feel good to spread vicious lies.

Nothing has nothing been proved against Biden, there’s not even been any evidence offered, yet he heads a “crime family”. No proof. No evidence. Yet guilty.. See your hypocrisy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, UT alum said:

Nothing has nothing been proved against Biden, there’s not even been any evidence offered, yet he heads a “crime family”. No proof. No evidence. Yet guilty.. See your hypocrisy?

Whataboutism? I think you know better……..but I’m the hypocrite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, UT alum said:

Nothing has nothing been proved against Biden, there’s not even been any evidence offered, yet he heads a “crime family”. No proof. No evidence. Yet guilty.. See your hypocrisy?

Biden says during a live interview that no money will be given to Ukraine,  unless the prosecutor that is investigating his son is fired.  But, you say there is no proof of his corruption.  You just don’t want to see it!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, UT alum said:

Nothing has nothing been proved against Biden, there’s not even been any evidence offered, yet he heads a “crime family”. No proof. No evidence. Yet guilty.. See your hypocrisy?

 "I've never talked to my Son about his business deals"

UT, I'm not sure if you have kids, but I do, and I also had a father.  My Dad was the most supportive and best Dad anyone could ask for.  So, If Biden is the Father he claims, do you really believe he never asked his Son about his business ventures? My income and financial well being was always asked by my Dad. He wanted to make sure I was OK.  We all know Hunter was not OK.....You think Biden was silent watching his Kid spiral? 

There is 5000 emails that Biden used alias email addresses.....

I think he lied, and people lie to cover things they don't want you to know.....so, to me, that along with 5000 emails, plus Hunters own admission his Father was sitting next to him during his business deals is plenty evidence to start an investigation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thetragichippy said:

 "I've never talked to my Son about his business deals"

UT, I'm not sure if you have kids, but I do, and I also had a father.  My Dad was the most supportive and best Dad anyone could ask for.  So, If Biden is the Father he claims, do you really believe he never asked his Son about his business ventures? My income and financial well being was always asked by my Dad. He wanted to make sure I was OK.  We all know Hunter was not OK.....You think Biden was silent watching his Kid spiral? 

There is 5000 emails that Biden used alias email addresses.....

I think he lied, and people lie to cover things they don't want you to know.....so, to me, that along with 5000 emails, plus Hunters own admission his Father was sitting next to him during his business deals is plenty evidence to start an investigation. 

I have no clue how he handles his personal life. I know he’s had more personal tragedy than most. I have no problem with an investigation. If there’s evidence, let’s see it. Where’d that 5000 number come from, by the way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Biden says during a live interview that no money will be given to Ukraine,  unless the prosecutor that is investigating his son is fired.  But, you say there is no proof of his corruption.  You just don’t want to see it!!!

The prosecutor was corrupt. That he was investigating Hunter is irrelevant. Biden could’ve simply said “Leave my son alone and you’ll keep your job”.  That’s how a “boss” does it. Still ain’t no proof. Not even any material evidence. Just smoke for the Orange Man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, UT alum said:

The prosecutor was corrupt. That he was investigating Hunter is irrelevant. Biden could’ve simply said “Leave my son alone and you’ll keep your job”.  That’s how a “boss” does it. Still ain’t no proof. Not even any material evidence. Just smoke for the Orange Man.

OMG….. IRRELEVANT?????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I have no clue how he handles his personal life. I know he’s had more personal tragedy than most. I have no problem with an investigation. If there’s evidence, let’s see it. Where’d that 5000 number come from, by the way?

 

This is the hidden content, please

 

This is the hidden content, please

 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UT alum said:

The prosecutor was corrupt. That he was investigating Hunter is irrelevant. Biden could’ve simply said “Leave my son alone and you’ll keep your job”.  That’s how a “boss” does it. Still ain’t no proof. Not even any material evidence. Just smoke for the Orange Man.

Of course you are blind, just like I suspected. How is forcing a government to fire someone for money irrelevant?  It’s called quid pro quo.  You know that thing Trump was impeached for, which no proof of was found.  biden says it plain as day, yet you and big girl don’t have enough sense to comprehend it.  The proof is that the prosecutor was fired, and the second worst potus in history sent the money.  In case you are wondering, the current po💩potus is the worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...