Jump to content

Transfers

FALCONS2026

By FALCONS2026
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Cougtalk

Cougtalk

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, FALCONS2026 said:

Does anyone know what the rules are for students transferring from one school to another as far as their eligibility for the following year. It seems I can point to several examples that have all been handled completely different.

Depends on a lot of factors. 

If deemed to have moved for athletic purposes the student tends to be ineligible for a single year.

Typically for it to not be considered athletics purposes there needs to be a life event change like job that required moving or clear quality of life improvement for the student. Also, Divorces and custody can sometimes play a role. Also, children of teacher can move to any district that their parent currently teaches at. 

However, the district committee determines eligibility initially. If a player transfers from school A to school B, the school file all their paperwork and it's approved then it can be deemed for non-athletic purposes. However, as is the case is some transfers if a student transfers from school A to school B and School A contest the validity of the transfer then it goes through a whole process that can eventually lead to the State determining eligibility for student. The burden of proof is on the student which is about the least democratic thing we could possibly do but nonetheless why punish coaches when you can punish students. 

I did a deep dive about a month ago looking into these rules.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
FALCONS2026

FALCONS2026

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, Cougtalk said:

Depends on a lot of factors. 

If deemed to have moved for athletic purposes the student tends to be ineligible for a single year.

Typically for it to not be considered athletics purposes there needs to be a life event change like job that required moving or clear quality of life improvement for the student. Also, Divorces and custody can sometimes play a role. Also, children of teacher can move to any district that their parent currently teaches at. 

However, the district committee determines eligibility initially. If a player transfers from school A to school B, the school file all their paperwork and it's approved then it can be deemed for non-athletic purposes. However, as is the case is some transfers if a student transfers from school A to school B and School A contest the validity of the transfer then it goes through a whole process that can eventually lead to the State determining eligibility for student. The burden of proof is on the student which is about the least democratic thing we could possibly do but nonetheless why punish coaches when you can punish students. 

I did a deep dive about a month ago looking into these rules.  

Damn that was thorough. Thanks for the info. That explains why I've seen it handled so many different ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NorthoftheBorder

NorthoftheBorder

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, FALCONS2026 said:

Does anyone know what the rules are for students transferring from one school to another as far as their eligibility for the following year. It seems I can point to several examples that have all been handled completely different.

Like it is for the NCAA now, it is a free for all and has been for a while.  I have heard many stories through the years where the "richer" programs in the state have been able to "offer" jobs that are close to the district to the parent(s) so the family can move their kid in.  Probably hasn't happened nearly as much at all in the Golden Triangle as it has happened in the larger schools in Houston/DFW/Austin areas.  It's nothing new!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
marshman

marshman

Posted
Posted

Yep it’s handled differently for each case.  We moved back to Orange (I say back because both the wife and I grew up there) in 2011.  We had been living In Mississippi. Our son was going into his senior year and played football in Mississippi. He actually had been listed as a possible preseason all state lineman in the Mississippi Gridiron magazine. (There version of Dave Campbells). We moved back because of elderly parents, mainly my mom in law which my wife was her primary caregiver.  When my son enrolled at LCM the district UIL committee had to meet to decide if he was eligible. They determined our move was not for athletic reasons and said he was eligible. They sent all the paperwork to Austin to the state committee to sign off on it and told us it’s just a formality the state almost always sides with the district executive committee. Well 1 person on the state committee didn’t believe us. Wished I could remember his name. Anyways they denied it because of him and my son was not allowed to play football his senior year. We appealed it and they set us up a meeting in mid December right before the Christmas break. Well after football was over!  We did make the drive to Austin anyways and this time they approved him but little good that did. 
sorry for the long story but we really feel the UIL cost him playing his senior year.  So yes it’s handled very differently depending on the situation involved and who’s sitting on both the district and state committees. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bud Kilmer

Bud Kilmer

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Cougtalk said:

Depends on a lot of factors. 

If deemed to have moved for athletic purposes the student tends to be ineligible for a single year.

Typically for it to not be considered athletics purposes there needs to be a life event change like job that required moving or clear quality of life improvement for the student. Also, Divorces and custody can sometimes play a role. Also, children of teacher can move to any district that their parent currently teaches at. 

However, the district committee determines eligibility initially. If a player transfers from school A to school B, the school file all their paperwork and it's approved then it can be deemed for non-athletic purposes. However, as is the case is some transfers if a student transfers from school A to school B and School A contest the validity of the transfer then it goes through a whole process that can eventually lead to the State determining eligibility for student. The burden of proof is on the student which is about the least democratic thing we could possibly do but nonetheless why punish coaches when you can punish students. 

I did a deep dive about a month ago looking into these rules.  

What about if the school offers a parent a job to get them to come to their school to play football? Is that moving for athletic purposes?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KB24

KB24

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, FALCONS2026 said:

Does anyone know what the rules are for students transferring from one school to another as far as their eligibility for the following year. It seems I can point to several examples that have all been handled completely different.

Typically if the kid moves during the school year and completes a grading period. There is no eligibility issue. Don’t wait until school is out. That’s when residency and other factors come into play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
Just now, setxathlete14 said:

Depends on if they're winning games or not. We didn't have any trouble when we weren't very good. Funny how that works.

Well imo there is a difference in quality of transfers. Id like to have 5 star d1 guys. If they come from vinton and wasn't starting there well thats not good.  You made a reference to the back up running from wos. He was behind Shaw that is going to U of H. I mean there is alot of good backs that would back him up. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
setxathlete14

setxathlete14

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, LCMAlumtiger32 said:

Well imo there is a difference in quality of transfers. Id like to have 5 star d1 guys. If they come from vinton and wasn't starting there well thats not good.  You made a reference to the back up running from wos. He was behind Shaw that is going to U of H. I mean there is alot of good backs that would back him up. 

Also referring to when the shoe is on the other foot

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CCRed

CCRed

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, kenny powers said:

Ah you mean when she was in 8th grade. Little different when a former starting WR quits midseason and moves to Crosby 

Yes, in 8th grade with D1 offers and a four year varsity starter.

As far as the WR, you guys wouldn’t play him.  He did not start when we played BH.  He also did not play varsity at Crosby this year either.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Concerned Citizen

Concerned Citizen

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, kenny powers said:

Ah you mean when she was in 8th grade. Little different when a former starting WR quits midseason and moves to Crosby 

In this particular situation, BH was playing chess while Crosby was playing checkers! Shame on crosby for giving up a McDonald’s AA, and #1 WNBA pick. Plus is she stays in Crosby they probably would have been state champs. Kudos to BH!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Concerned Citizen

Concerned Citizen

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, kenny powers said:

What about if the school offers a parent a job to get them to come to their school to play football? Is that moving for athletic purposes?  

Even if the parent work in that district but don’t live in the district zone, they will get denied by UIL. The address on the PAPF needs to be in the district zone, if not I am pretty certain the DEC will deny. As part of that process the new school coach supposed to do an “in home” visit to verify the athlete resides at the address on the PAPF. 
 

The parent will get a waiver from the district for the student to attend school ( academically), but the PAPF get process totally different (as many of you all know). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bud Kilmer

Bud Kilmer

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, EyePayTaxes2 said:

Even if the parent work in that district but don’t live in the district zone, they will get denied by UIL. The address on the PAPF needs to be in the district zone, if not I am pretty certain the DEC will deny. As part of that process the new school coach supposed to do an “in home” visit to verify the athlete resides at the address on the PAPF. 
 

The parent will get a waiver from the district for the student to attend school ( academically), but the PAPF get process totally different (as many of you all know). 

Well they better get to moving! 

 

He didnt play because he had a problem with skipping practice btw. So as long as practice is not mandatory at Crosby, yall should be good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • SmashMouth
      Baton Rouge split in half?

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • tvc184
      Baton Rouge split in half?

      By tvc184 · Posted

      We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • AggiesAreWe
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By AggiesAreWe · Posted

      Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • SmashMouth
      Even More From The Friendly muslims!

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • AHUDDLESTON
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By AHUDDLESTON · Posted

      Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...