Jump to content

Lumberton Raider Fan Perspective


RaiderFan4life

Recommended Posts

Someone, anyone,  PLEASE explain to me why the Lumberton Raiders have more overall talent on the defensive line than we’ve seen in 10+ years aren’t rushing the QB. To be more precise, why are the ends dropping back into coverage and aren’t covering anyone ?! Not that they can’t physically cover a potential receiver or a running back coming out of backfield. They’re dropping back and no one is even there. In turn, there’s no outside containment ! Screw the zone ! OR play some outside backers and let the ends play the end. To be clear, this is not the players faults. This is the defensive scheme and the plays that are being called. In my opinion, the game against HF shouldn’t have been a close game.  It should have been a complete blowout.  We were twice the size of those kids, had twice the numbers with more team speed. Not to take anything away from HF, that team never gave up and kept coming at us. Seriously ! And one more thing, Offensive Line: DO YOUR JOB AND STAY ON YOUR GUY UNTIL THE WHISTLE BLOWS ! Have some pride and realize the talent that you have at the specialty positions. Don’t get much better than what we’ve got! Unless some major changes are made it ain’t looking good Raider fans. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure you are talking about the defensive ends dropping into coverage or the outside linebackers?  I have seen Lumberton play this year and they run a 3-4 on defense.  If they were dropping their ends, then they would only be rushing 1 player.  I know against HF, they sent a lot of pressure, just couldn't get to QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, setxasfan said:

Are you sure you are talking about the defensive ends dropping into coverage or the outside linebackers?  I have seen Lumberton play this year and they run a 3-4 on defense.  If they were dropping their ends, then they would only be rushing 1 player.  I know against HF, they sent a lot of pressure, just couldn't get to QB.

Their ends are probably in a 4i and he doesn't realize and thinks the OLBs are actually ends.... I've never seen Lumberton play, but I bet I just solved the puzzle lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, RaiderFan4life said:

Someone, anyone,  PLEASE explain to me why the Lumberton Raiders have more overall talent on the defensive line than we’ve seen in 10+ years aren’t rushing the QB. To be more precise, why are the ends dropping back into coverage and aren’t covering anyone ?! Not that they can’t physically cover a potential receiver or a running back coming out of backfield. They’re dropping back and no one is even there. In turn, there’s no outside containment ! Screw the zone ! OR play some outside backers and let the ends play the end. To be clear, this is not the players faults. This is the defensive scheme and the plays that are being called. In my opinion, the game against HF shouldn’t have been a close game.  It should have been a complete blowout.  We were twice the size of those kids, had twice the numbers with more team speed. Not to take anything away from HF, that team never gave up and kept coming at us. Seriously ! And one more thing, Offensive Line: DO YOUR JOB AND STAY ON YOUR GUY UNTIL THE WHISTLE BLOWS ! Have some pride and realize the talent that you have at the specialty positions. Don’t get much better than what we’ve got! Unless some major changes are made it ain’t looking good Raider fans. 

With all due respect, you may be confused on the front and the coverage. And they do have decent talent in the D line, but I don’t think it’s the best in the last 10 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure hope the staff reads this and gets their act together.  If only more fans with their vast wealth of knowledge could tell coaches what scheme to utilize....all would be right in this world.  

Quite sure the kids really appreciate the input as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, myrecordwashorrible said:

I sure hope the staff reads this and gets their act together.  If only more fans with their vast wealth of knowledge could tell coaches what scheme to utilize....all would be right in this world.  

Quite sure the kids really appreciate the input as well.  

I would be willing to bet he coached junior league football at some time....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, RaiderFan4life said:

Someone, anyone,  PLEASE explain to me why the Lumberton Raiders have more overall talent on the defensive line than we’ve seen in 10+ years aren’t rushing the QB. To be more precise, why are the ends dropping back into coverage and aren’t covering anyone ?! Not that they can’t physically cover a potential receiver or a running back coming out of backfield. They’re dropping back and no one is even there. In turn, there’s no outside containment ! Screw the zone ! OR play some outside backers and let the ends play the end. To be clear, this is not the players faults. This is the defensive scheme and the plays that are being called. In my opinion, the game against HF shouldn’t have been a close game.  It should have been a complete blowout.  We were twice the size of those kids, had twice the numbers with more team speed. Not to take anything away from HF, that team never gave up and kept coming at us. Seriously ! And one more thing, Offensive Line: DO YOUR JOB AND STAY ON YOUR GUY UNTIL THE WHISTLE BLOWS ! Have some pride and realize the talent that you have at the specialty positions. Don’t get much better than what we’ve got! Unless some major changes are made it ain’t looking good Raider fans. 

Maybe HF is pretty good themselves....... 🤷🏾‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought this was a basically open forum where THOUGHTS could be expressed? OMG its not like the guy dropped a bunch of F-bombs or called the coaches a bunch of nasty names. He said "Perspective and In my opinion". I have no idea if the guy is right or wrong, or somewhere in between, but shouldn't the guy get some latitude here?  

Some hear are WAY too sensitive. Heck I just got cussed by a very well known poster here and I didn't even blink. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

I thought this was a basically open forum where THOUGHTS could be expressed? OMG its not like the guy dropped a bunch of F-bombs or called the coaches a bunch of nasty names. He said "Perspective and In my opinion". I have no idea if the guy is right or wrong, or somewhere in between, but shouldn't the guy get some latitude here?  

Some hear are WAY too sensitive. Heck I just got cussed by a very well known poster here and I didn't even blink. 

 

The thread and post still remains up so it's still an "open forum". But let's remember a very important fact. This website is independently owned and operated and rules and regulations are set by this owner and carried out by the moderators. This is not a democratic authority. Posts can and will be removed if deemed necessary. So the term "open forum" is not exactly accurate. You may need to look at forum rules a little more closely.

As for this particular thread, if someone makes a thread with this type subject matter, one should expect feedback, both positive and negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Separation Scientist said:

I thought this was a basically open forum where THOUGHTS could be expressed? OMG its not like the guy dropped a bunch of F-bombs or called the coaches a bunch of nasty names. He said "Perspective and In my opinion". I have no idea if the guy is right or wrong, or somewhere in between, but shouldn't the guy get some latitude here?  

Some hear are WAY too sensitive. Heck I just got cussed by a very well known poster here and I didn't even blink. 

 

When a statement is made attempting to actually sound knowledgeable about Football tactics/techniques/positions, but instead outs themselves as the complete opposite, it is worthy of the negative feedback. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Separation Scientist said:

I thought this was a basically open forum where THOUGHTS could be expressed? OMG its not like the guy dropped a bunch of F-bombs or called the coaches a bunch of nasty names. He said "Perspective and In my opinion". I have no idea if the guy is right or wrong, or somewhere in between, but shouldn't the guy get some latitude here?  

Some hear are WAY too sensitive. Heck I just got cussed by a very well known poster here and I didn't even blink. 

 

In most situations where someone is questioning strategy, tactics, etc...I would fully be on board with your thoughts.  However, this individual slammed people fairly hard including my biggest issue.  That issue is the claim on a public forum that 5 (o- limeman) that are teenagers have no pride in their task/job/themselves.  

I may be wrong here, but sure has the appearance of a skill players parent possibly staring problems in a program that has historically struggled and has made strides to improve over the past decade or so.  Complete unnecessary and devisive.  I may be wrong, but it sure reads that way to me and apparently in some ways to others as well. 

Could have been asked/stated in a much better manner, especially in a first post.  Again, I may be wrong, but this screams, "I'm a fecal matter stirring inividual."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, _4_0_9_ said:

When a statement is made attempting to actually sound knowledgeable about Football tactics/techniques/positions, but instead outs themselves as the complete opposite, it is worthy of the negative feedback. 

Is that really what happened? Two very knowledgable people can view the exact same game and come up with diametrically opposed OPINIONS. Last night ESPN was breaking down Bills QB Josh Allen. Four commentators split evenly, two said JA "runs too much and takes too many hits". The other two said JA "has to run because thats an important part of what makes JA a great QB". 

So, among these experts, who was right? Should someone just decide two of the four are wrong in their opinions and be should cancled for expressing an OPINION?  Does this forum have rules limiting discussion to only those deemed "knowledgeable"? 

Maybe it is your opinion that the poster "outed himself" but who gets to decide that?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/8/2022 at 3:05 PM, AggiesAreWe said:

As for this particular thread, if someone makes a thread with this type subject matter, one should expect feedback, both positive and negative.

I didn't see alot of "both positive and negative feedback" for the poster in question. Pretty much a pile on.

Speaking of name calling, thats against the rules too but sometimes I don't see the ones who call others names called out. Same with coach bashing. I see some eternally critical of certain coaches and apparently they get a pass. I am sure the owners of the site would support fair, consistant, and even handed applications of the forum rules. I am all for it!       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raiderfan4life made some very interesting observations and is not far off from reality. The fact that Lumberton came in with really high expectations and appear to be under performing, is cause for concern. I attended the HF game and saw a team that did not play with much passion and sense of urgency, players and coaches alike. My guess is Lumberton will be just fine once district starts and will finish 2nd or 3rd, LCM will win the district.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

The original point was completely taken out of context by a few of you football geniuses. We have a guy who is being heavily recruited as an edge rusher and wasn’t being used as such. Adjustments were made defensively. Outside containment was much much better and defensive front was dominant. The O line was spectacular throughout district play. Overall best offense I’ve seen at Lumberton. Very impressed with the coaching staff. Some of y’all should have stayed in truck. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Anybody know information on Wells vs Brookeland?
    • TAPPS  Division 2 District 5 5-1 Kelly vs. 4-4 Saint Mary's Hall Catholic  Tuesday, April 30, 11:00, Kelly Catholic   5-2 St. John XXIII vs. 4-3 Victoria St. Joseph Tuesday, April 30, 4:00, St. John XXIII   5-3 Lutheran South vs. 4-2 TMI Episcopal  Thursday, May 2, 5:00, TMI    5-4 Second Baptist vs. 4-1 San Antonio Christian  Tuesday, April 30, 5:00, San Antonio Christian School  
    • 24-1A W24 Brookeland Brookeland advances due to BYE   W23 Martinsville VS R24 Chester  1 Game: Friday, May 3 at 4PM at Chester  
    • 25-2A W25 Evadale VS F26 Somerville  Game 1: Thursday May 2 at 5pm at West Fork Game 2: Saturday May 4 at 1pm at West Fork Game 3: If needed follows   R25 Big Sandy VS T26 Iola  Game 1: Friday May 3 at 5pm at New Waverly HS Game 2: Follows Game 3: If needed, Saturday May 4 at 2:00pm at New Waverly HS   R26 Burton VS T25 Sabine Pass  Game 1: Friday May 3 at 4:30pm at Splendora Game 2: Follows Game 3: If needed, Saturday May 4 at 1:00pm at Splendora   W26 Mumford VS F25 West Hardin  Game 1: Thursday May 2 at 5:30pm at CE King Game 2: Follows Game 3: If needed, Friday May 3 at 6:30 at CE King  
    • If the voting public is so flaky that 3/4 will turn against her because of this news, why didn't they also turn on Obama when it was discovered that he actually ate dog? Maybe because the media didn't play up his transgressions? And if that is the case, how much power does the media have? They can sink a career for killing a dog, but dismiss and bury a story of eating a dog? How influential would the media be if someone other that Trump won the nomination. Let's say DeSantis was the Republican frontrunner...how easy would it be for the media to bury his candidacy...instead of him having that perceived cakewalk to president? I'm just thinking out loud.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...