Jump to content

La Marque 0 Huffman Hargrave 42/FINAL

WOSgrad

By WOSgrad
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

Curious to see how Huffman will do vs a quality opponent 

Yep, with their pre-district sch, it’s difficult to know how good they really are.   Wouldn’t surprise me for them to go undefeated in District though.  Vidor’s offense has trouble against a good disciplined defense.  Maybe Coach Matthews is saving the Pirate passing attack for them. 🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites
texbuzz

texbuzz

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Hagar said:

Yep, with their pre-district sch, it’s difficult to know how good they really are.   Wouldn’t surprise me for them to go undefeated in District though.  Vidor’s offense has trouble against a good disciplined defense.  Maybe Coach Matthews is saving the Pirate passing attack for them. 🤣

Schedule so far:  Huffman hasn't played a winning program yet.  That makes it tough.  Needville and Navasota were good tests and they came out on top but we will see.  Things seemed to click better after Needville.  If I was to rank things based on (a system I just pulled out of thin air) Quality of Performance ("-1" for a loss, "0" being an expected win, "1" being a good win, "2" being a great win) Huffman is at a Grade "2" after 4 games.  

Stafford (1-4): Athletic and big. Conditioning and execution was the issue with Stafford.  Stafford has played two good teams (Calhoun and Bellville) lost to Sealy (2-2) and beat Wharton (Wharton is not good this year).  Probably not a great indicator of quality.

Needville (2-3): played nasty and was big and fast. The comment I heard from a player was "Stafford was more athletic but Needville played football better." That game was close. Huffman wore them out and played more disciplined.  Needville beat a gamey Livingston team (3-2), Lost to a mediocre Navarro team, Lost by 1 point to a good Yoakum (4-0), and beat a bad Sweeny team(1-4).  Needville was a step up in competition.  Not a dominant performance but got the job done.  I would lean towards this being a good not great win.

Navasota (2-2):  I don't know. I expected a lot more out of Navasota than that. Losing to Mexia may have knocked the wind out of their sails.  When their starting QB came in fresh the second half, I thought they could get some momentum.  This is a good not great win.  

LaMarque(0-4): Good teams are supposed to win this game.  I'm not deep diving on their schedule, Huffman did score almost double the points they have allowed per game this year.  Huffman played clean and methodical. A win.

Upcoming Schedule:

LCM (0-2): They will probably be 0-3 coming into the game against Huffman.  Jasper (4-0) is a tough game for anybody.  This should (anything can happen, I know) follow the same pattern as the LaMarque game.

Lumberton (1-3): If they shock Livingston, this could be a good win potential for Huffman.  Livingston put up some points on Needville and Huffman struggled to do that.

Splendora (1-3): Splendora wants this to be a rivalry game, and I get it.  They will see Vidor and Livingston before this game and if they can put something together, it is possible this will be the first team Huffman sees with a winning record.  Potential to be a good win.

Vidor (2-1): Lost to Jasper.  Jasper is real good in my opinion. Bay City and Brazosport shouldn't have been as close as they were.  This will be the first game with the potential for a great win.  

Livingston (3-2): Decent chance Livingston and Huffman are playing for the DC this game.  They give up some points against middle of the road teams, Huffman hasn't yet.  This could be a great win.

 

This sure was a long post to just say "Yeah, Hagar...you right."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmashMouth

SmashMouth

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, texbuzz said:

Schedule so far:  Huffman hasn't played a winning program yet.  That makes it tough.  Needville and Navasota were good tests and they came out on top but we will see.  Things seemed to click better after Needville.  If I was to rank things based on (a system I just pulled out of thin air) Quality of Performance ("-1" for a loss, "0" being an expected win, "1" being a good win, "2" being a great win) Huffman is at a Grade "2" after 4 games.  

Stafford (1-4): Athletic and big. Conditioning and execution was the issue with Stafford.  Stafford has played two good teams (Calhoun and Bellville) lost to Sealy (2-2) and beat Wharton (Wharton is not good this year).  Probably not a great indicator of quality.

Needville (2-3): played nasty and was big and fast. The comment I heard from a player was "Stafford was more athletic but Needville played football better." That game was close. Huffman wore them out and played more disciplined.  Needville beat a gamey Livingston team (3-2), Lost to a mediocre Navarro team, Lost by 1 point to a good Yoakum (4-0), and beat a bad Sweeny team(1-4).  Needville was a step up in competition.  Not a dominant performance but got the job done.  I would lean towards this being a good not great win.

Navasota (2-2):  I don't know. I expected a lot more out of Navasota than that. Losing to Mexia may have knocked the wind out of their sails.  When their starting QB came in fresh the second half, I thought they could get some momentum.  This is a good not great win.  

LaMarque(0-4): Good teams are supposed to win this game.  I'm not deep diving on their schedule, Huffman did score almost double the points they have allowed per game this year.  Huffman played clean and methodical. A win.

Upcoming Schedule:

LCM (0-2): They will probably be 0-3 coming into the game against Huffman.  Jasper (4-0) is a tough game for anybody.  This should (anything can happen, I know) follow the same pattern as the LaMarque game.

Lumberton (1-3): If they shock Livingston, this could be a good win potential for Huffman.  Livingston put up some points on Needville and Huffman struggled to do that.

Splendora (1-3): Splendora wants this to be a rivalry game, and I get it.  They will see Vidor and Livingston before this game and if they can put something together, it is possible this will be the first team Huffman sees with a winning record.  Potential to be a good win.

Vidor (2-1): Lost to Jasper.  Jasper is real good in my opinion. Bay City and Brazosport shouldn't have been as close as they were.  This will be the first game with the potential for a great win.  

Livingston (3-2): Decent chance Livingston and Huffman are playing for the DC this game.  They give up some points against middle of the road teams, Huffman hasn't yet.  This could be a great win.

 

This sure was a long post to just say "Yeah, Hagar...you right."

Idk if you’re originally from Livingston, but believe me friend, Livingston will not be playing for the DC. They’ll get 2 wins possibly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
texbuzz

texbuzz

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Idk if you’re originally from Livingston, but believe me friend, Livingston will not be playing for the DC. They’ll get 2 wins possibly. 

I am probably putting a lot of credit on the Needville loss.  I am guessing they can win their district games with Vidor being the toughest game before the Huffman game.  I saw some film from the scrimmage with Stafford and Livingston didn't look good.  I try to ignore scrimmage film.  

Sounds like you have seen more Livingston than I have.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
2wedge

2wedge

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, texbuzz said:

Schedule so far:  Huffman hasn't played a winning program yet.  That makes it tough.  Needville and Navasota were good tests and they came out on top but we will see.  Things seemed to click better after Needville.  If I was to rank things based on (a system I just pulled out of thin air) Quality of Performance ("-1" for a loss, "0" being an expected win, "1" being a good win, "2" being a great win) Huffman is at a Grade "2" after 4 games.  

Stafford (1-4): Athletic and big. Conditioning and execution was the issue with Stafford.  Stafford has played two good teams (Calhoun and Bellville) lost to Sealy (2-2) and beat Wharton (Wharton is not good this year).  Probably not a great indicator of quality.

Needville (2-3): played nasty and was big and fast. The comment I heard from a player was "Stafford was more athletic but Needville played football better." That game was close. Huffman wore them out and played more disciplined.  Needville beat a gamey Livingston team (3-2), Lost to a mediocre Navarro team, Lost by 1 point to a good Yoakum (4-0), and beat a bad Sweeny team(1-4).  Needville was a step up in competition.  Not a dominant performance but got the job done.  I would lean towards this being a good not great win.

Navasota (2-2):  I don't know. I expected a lot more out of Navasota than that. Losing to Mexia may have knocked the wind out of their sails.  When their starting QB came in fresh the second half, I thought they could get some momentum.  This is a good not great win.  

LaMarque(0-4): Good teams are supposed to win this game.  I'm not deep diving on their schedule, Huffman did score almost double the points they have allowed per game this year.  Huffman played clean and methodical. A win.

Upcoming Schedule:

LCM (0-2): They will probably be 0-3 coming into the game against Huffman.  Jasper (4-0) is a tough game for anybody.  This should (anything can happen, I know) follow the same pattern as the LaMarque game.

Lumberton (1-3): If they shock Livingston, this could be a good win potential for Huffman.  Livingston put up some points on Needville and Huffman struggled to do that.

Splendora (1-3): Splendora wants this to be a rivalry game, and I get it.  They will see Vidor and Livingston before this game and if they can put something together, it is possible this will be the first team Huffman sees with a winning record.  Potential to be a good win.

Vidor (2-1): Lost to Jasper.  Jasper is real good in my opinion. Bay City and Brazosport shouldn't have been as close as they were.  This will be the first game with the potential for a great win.  

Livingston (3-2): Decent chance Livingston and Huffman are playing for the DC this game.  They give up some points against middle of the road teams, Huffman hasn't yet.  This could be a great win.

 

This sure was a long post to just say "Yeah, Hagar...you right."

Where will the Huffman v Vidor game be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boneyard Boys

Boneyard Boys

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, SmashMouth said:

Idk if you’re originally from Livingston, but believe me friend, Livingston will not be playing for the DC. They’ll get 2 wins possibly. 

 

7 minutes ago, texbuzz said:

I am probably putting a lot of credit on the Needville loss.  I am guessing they can win their district games with Vidor being the toughest game before the Huffman game.  I saw some film from the scrimmage with Stafford and Livingston didn't look good.  I try to ignore scrimmage film.  

Sounds like you have seen more Livingston than I have.  

Who has Livingston beat thus far? Seeing their 3-2 record kind of surprised me, having played 5 games to this point is good for them. I believe they only beat Orangefield by a point but even Silsbee struggled with OF so who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Boneyard Boys said:

That game is in Vidor, thankfully the only remaining game where we have to travel far is Livingston and Lumberton is our only other road game but I have a feeling both of those games might be sneaky tough.

Livingston appears better than in the past, and Ltown will want to beat Vidor more than anyone on their schedule.  Yep, both will be tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrojanWarrior08

TrojanWarrior08

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, texbuzz said:

Schedule so far:  Huffman hasn't played a winning program yet.  That makes it tough.  Needville and Navasota were good tests and they came out on top but we will see.  Things seemed to click better after Needville.  If I was to rank things based on (a system I just pulled out of thin air) Quality of Performance ("-1" for a loss, "0" being an expected win, "1" being a good win, "2" being a great win) Huffman is at a Grade "2" after 4 games.  

Stafford (1-4): Athletic and big. Conditioning and execution was the issue with Stafford.  Stafford has played two good teams (Calhoun and Bellville) lost to Sealy (2-2) and beat Wharton (Wharton is not good this year).  Probably not a great indicator of quality.

Needville (2-3): played nasty and was big and fast. The comment I heard from a player was "Stafford was more athletic but Needville played football better." That game was close. Huffman wore them out and played more disciplined.  Needville beat a gamey Livingston team (3-2), Lost to a mediocre Navarro team, Lost by 1 point to a good Yoakum (4-0), and beat a bad Sweeny team(1-4).  Needville was a step up in competition.  Not a dominant performance but got the job done.  I would lean towards this being a good not great win.

Navasota (2-2):  I don't know. I expected a lot more out of Navasota than that. Losing to Mexia may have knocked the wind out of their sails.  When their starting QB came in fresh the second half, I thought they could get some momentum.  This is a good not great win.  

LaMarque(0-4): Good teams are supposed to win this game.  I'm not deep diving on their schedule, Huffman did score almost double the points they have allowed per game this year.  Huffman played clean and methodical. A win.

Upcoming Schedule:

LCM (0-2): They will probably be 0-3 coming into the game against Huffman.  Jasper (4-0) is a tough game for anybody.  This should (anything can happen, I know) follow the same pattern as the LaMarque game.

Lumberton (1-3): If they shock Livingston, this could be a good win potential for Huffman.  Livingston put up some points on Needville and Huffman struggled to do that.

Splendora (1-3): Splendora wants this to be a rivalry game, and I get it.  They will see Vidor and Livingston before this game and if they can put something together, it is possible this will be the first team Huffman sees with a winning record.  Potential to be a good win.

Vidor (2-1): Lost to Jasper.  Jasper is real good in my opinion. Bay City and Brazosport shouldn't have been as close as they were.  This will be the first game with the potential for a great win.  

Livingston (3-2): Decent chance Livingston and Huffman are playing for the DC this game.  They give up some points against middle of the road teams, Huffman hasn't yet.  This could be a great win.

 

This sure was a long post to just say "Yeah, Hagar...you right."

Splendora (1-3): Splendora wants this to be a rivalry game, and I get it.  

One would say that y'all are rivals especially back in the early '00s when we were all in the same district (Coldspring, Barbers Hill, Shepherd, Huffman, Liberty, Splendora, Tarkington, and Cleveland)... Outside of Splendora's true rivals which is Cleveland (maybe Tarkington) I think Huffman is the closest team that they can considered to be their rivals I mean back then both schools had pretty competitive games

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TrojanWarrior08

TrojanWarrior08

Posted
Posted
Just now, TrojanWarrior08 said:

Splendora (1-3): Splendora wants this to be a rivalry game, and I get it.  

One would say that y'all are rivals especially back in the early '00s when we were all in the same district (Coldspring, Barbers Hill, Shepherd, Huffman, Liberty, Splendora, Tarkington, and Cleveland)... Outside of Splendora's true rivals which is Cleveland (maybe Tarkington) I think Huffman is the closest team that they can considered to be their rivals I mean back then both schools had pretty competitive games

 

Actually did both schools played for a district championship game a few seasons ago I'm not sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites
texbuzz

texbuzz

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, TrojanWarrior08 said:

Splendora (1-3): Splendora wants this to be a rivalry game, and I get it.  

One would say that y'all are rivals especially back in the early '00s when we were all in the same district (Coldspring, Barbers Hill, Shepherd, Huffman, Liberty, Splendora, Tarkington, and Cleveland)... Outside of Splendora's true rivals which is Cleveland (maybe Tarkington) I think Huffman is the closest team that they can considered to be their rivals I mean back then both schools had pretty competitive games

 

There was some interviews with Vype I think, of Splendora players and they said they had this game circled on their calendars.  not sure about the district championships stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,954
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    catherine
    Newest Member
    catherine
    Joined


  • Posts

    • outanup
      Multi-Sport Athletes

      By outanup · Posted

      The battle over multi sport athletes has been fought forever.....This didn't  start 3 weeks ago. Football is one of the few sports that is not played year round. It simply cannot be, too physical and taxing. It requires an offseason of strength training, and conditioning to prepare for a10 to 15 game grind. Coach Rich is installing everything from scratch. A whole new Offense and Defense, from cadence to cleats. And football starts in August. Any AD worth his salt would push his agenda......And as for the social media assault, what's the reason for that? Ill wait........hmmmmmmmmm
    • OlDawg
      La Porte Football stadium

      By OlDawg · Posted

      I had actually been told by a former coach that Abseck had declined allowing La Porte to use Eagle Stadium this year. But, I take it as just a rumor. I don’t really know & haven’t heard confirmation one way or the other. Seemed a little over a HC/AD pay grade to decide facility usage. But, I may be wrong. Wouldn’t be the first time.
    • PlayActionPass
      Multi-Sport Athletes

      By PlayActionPass · Posted

      Strength, flexibility and range of motion SHOULD be mandatory in EVERY lifting program. However, we all know that is not the case. Pitchers should definitely be on a different regiment than other athletes. Arm care is serious business. Too many football coaches fail other sports because they simply do not care. There are ways to build strength and power and explosiveness that do not compromise the baseball players ability to throw or the basketball players ability to shoot. Unfortunately, too many football coaches are too lazy to find those alternative options.   
    • bullets13
      Locals in the Pros, All Sports?

      By bullets13 · Posted

      we can.  I believe the Dallas brothers are both in the minors right now.  
    • OlDawg
      La Porte Football stadium

      By OlDawg · Posted

      Late January. Groundbreaking was January 13. Of course, hurricane season will have a lot to do with the schedule as the school complex is less than a tenth of a mile from the bay. That’s also part of the expense. Much tougher building codes—which equals cost. It was sorely needed. Old Bulldog wouldn’t pass inspections any more. Plus, being able to host events should help with some of the maintenance budget costs. I wish they’d have been able to buy out the strip center next to the stadium for parking. But, my understanding is the owners wouldn’t sell at this time.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...