Jump to content

LCM at Woodville

Bobcatfan4life

By Bobcatfan4life
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Both of them are 0-3.

Where's @LC-M?

I havnt really been following high school football this year. My honest Opinion  about LCM and I havnt seen one snap this year. But to be honest it will probably be the same ole story 5-5 season a “crouch special”. My team will probably be changing soon lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

That bad over there?

I don’t think it’s horrible like some other schools. Just not changing. It’s the same ole story. The sad part is there’s kids walking the hallways that could start at LCM and that  are to lazy to play. It’s not all Crouch fault but at the same time how long do you give a coach a chance to change the program to be a winner? For our Vidor friend   Last Time I checked LCM still has a winning record against every school In Orange County except WOS. So I guess the kids that couldn’t get playing time at WOS is better than the rest in OC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boneyard Boys

Boneyard Boys

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

@Boneyard Boys needs some aloe vera for that burn.

🔥👀 Ouch... lol. 
 

I’ll just wait until we run them off the field later this season to get my shots in.

It’s going to be fun being in their district for a few years. He’s going to want to pick a new team soon, the Vidor Pirates are right down the road my friend if you want to follow a winner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LCMAlumtiger32

LCMAlumtiger32

Posted
Posted
75.  VIDOR ......................................................
77.  ITASCA .....................................................                
77.  LAMPASAS ..............................................               79.  COMANCHE ............................................                  
79.  SAN SABA ...............................................   
79.  TEAGUE ...................................................
 
82.  FERRIS ......................................................
82.  FW CARTER-RIVERSIDE.......................
82.  HOUSTON AUSTIN ................................                      85.  PORT LAVACA ........................................                      85.  SABINE ....................................................                      85.  SANTA FE ................................................                      88.  CLEVELAND ..........................................                      
89.  ALVORD ..................................................
89.  SLATON ...................................................           
91.  ANSON .....................................................                     
92.  ARCHER CITY ........................................
93.  ROYSE CITY  ..........................................                      94.  SA SOUTH SAN ......................................      
95.  JOSHUA ................................................... 
96.  HAMILTON ..............................................       
96.  KENEDY  .................................................                    
98.  LLANO .....................................................
98.  SNYDER ...................................................
100.  LOCKHART .............................................
100.  LOCKNEY ................................................
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boneyard Boys

Boneyard Boys

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, LC-M said:
75.  VIDOR ......................................................
77.  ITASCA .....................................................                
77.  LAMPASAS ..............................................               79.  COMANCHE ............................................                  
79.  SAN SABA ...............................................   
79.  TEAGUE ...................................................
 
82.  FERRIS ......................................................
82.  FW CARTER-RIVERSIDE.......................
82.  HOUSTON AUSTIN ................................                      85.  PORT LAVACA ........................................                      85.  SABINE ....................................................                      85.  SANTA FE ................................................                      88.  CLEVELAND ..........................................                      
89.  ALVORD ..................................................
89.  SLATON ...................................................           
91.  ANSON .....................................................                     
92.  ARCHER CITY ........................................
93.  ROYSE CITY  ..........................................                      94.  SA SOUTH SAN ......................................      
95.  JOSHUA ................................................... 
96.  HAMILTON ..............................................       
96.  KENEDY  .................................................                    
98.  LLANO .....................................................
98.  SNYDER ...................................................
100.  LOCKHART .............................................
100.  LOCKNEY ................................................

Idk what I'm looking at but I assume its something bad judging by the names of the teams on this list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boneyard Boys

Boneyard Boys

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, LC-M said:

To the reference above @Boneyard Boys Im going to have bring up a history lesson. Vidor is at 75 at the most losses in Texas football history I wouldnt call that a winner. LCM is not even in the 100 range. I would hope yall would beat us way the way yall boast about that program 

All the way down to #75 lol hey I cant help it we had a bad little run over a 40 year period but we are back baby they just had us over-classified.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,954
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    fasedo9317
    Newest Member
    fasedo9317
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 2wedge
      Will Anahuac lose a district game ?

      By 2wedge · Posted

      He actually had a pretty solid year for a sophomore starting in that district. I can assure you, it hasn't hurt his recruiting at all and that will only improve with the move back to the Wack. 
    • Bulldogs92
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By Bulldogs92 · Posted

      If Crumedy eventually has bigger aspirations than being in Jasper, every aspect of the program will be looked at when someone interviews him for any job. He knows that. The mindset needs to be that any time someone wears a Jasper uniform, that they're doing everything they possibly can to win. It matters.
    • LumRaiderFan
      Trump Running in 2024

      By LumRaiderFan · Posted

      This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up It's a poll but I could definitely see this as realistic.   From the article: Catholics in the United States have swung dramatically against President Biden in recent years, now boasting a significant statistical break towards his GOP challenger. Pew Research released on Apr. 30 a report exploring support for presidential candidates sorted by religious affiliation. The poll found that 55% of Catholics support or lean towards supporting former President Donald Trump in a head-to-head against Biden. Conversely, only 45% of Catholics support Biden in the same one-on-one pairing. The 12% margin of support in favor of Trump marks a significant shift from 2020, when he held an extremely narrow lead — 50% to 49%. Biden currently leads among Hispanic Catholics with a narrow 49%-47% split, but the close contest marks a major shift rightward for the demographic. In 2020, a similar poll from Pew Research found Hispanic Catholics preferred Biden to Trump with a staggering 67%-26% split.
    • 2wedge
      Multi-Sport Athletes

      By 2wedge · Posted

      You said a lot there. Truthfully, that is the root of the issue. Who cares what a kid thinks about how coaches are running a program? Kids play, coaches coach. For some reason, parents have this backward in a lot of places and its wreaking havoc. 
    • LumRaiderFan
      Republicans don't deserve...

      By LumRaiderFan · Posted

      He's already stated he's a huge Clinton fan.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...